Clinical Outcomes for Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Gynecological Malignancies.

Shane Mesko, Kiri Sandler, Joshua Cohen, Gottfried Konecny, Michael Steinberg, Mitchell Kamrava
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes for Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Gynecological Malignancies.","authors":"Shane Mesko, Kiri Sandler, Joshua Cohen, Gottfried Konecny, Michael Steinberg, Mitchell Kamrava","doi":"10.1097/IGC.0000000000000869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We report single-institution clinical outcomes of women treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastatic or progressive gynecological malignancies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From 2009 to 2015, 47 lesions from 28 patients were treated with SABR and retrospectively analyzed. All patients had oligometastatic (93%) or oligoprogressive (7%) disease. Primary cancer diagnoses were 15 ovarian, 8 endometrial, 2 cervical, 2 vaginal, and 1 uterine carcinosarcoma. Treatment was delivered using a median of 5 fractions to a median total dose of 40 Gy. Targets were grouped by treatment site and assessed for response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Mean biologically effective dose and pre-SABR tumor size were compared with response. Progression-free survival (PFS) was determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and toxicity outcomes were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 12.8 months. Target locations were 17% liver, 21% lung, 17% paraaortic node, 26% other node, and 19% pelvic soft tissue. After treatment, 34% of targets were stable (SD), 32% had a partial response (PR), 17% had a complete response (CR), and 17% had progressive disease (PD). No failures occurred in lung or nodal targets. Mean ± standard deviation pre-SABR tumor diameter was 24 ± 22 mm. There was a significant difference in mean size between lesions that had a favorable (SD, PR, and CR) versus unfavorable response (PD) (17.2 vs 57.6 mm, P = 0.0044). Lesions that responded favorably were also more likely to have received a higher biologically effective dose (79.0 vs 59.6 Gy, P = 0.027). Median PFS was 10.8 months, and 1 patient experienced grade 3 toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SABR is a safe and effective local treatment modality in patients with oligometastatic gynecological disease. Distant progression remains the primary mode of failure in this patient population. In carefully selected patients, a combination of systemic treatment and SABR may offer long-term PFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":13983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","volume":"29 1","pages":"403-408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We report single-institution clinical outcomes of women treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastatic or progressive gynecological malignancies.

Materials and methods: From 2009 to 2015, 47 lesions from 28 patients were treated with SABR and retrospectively analyzed. All patients had oligometastatic (93%) or oligoprogressive (7%) disease. Primary cancer diagnoses were 15 ovarian, 8 endometrial, 2 cervical, 2 vaginal, and 1 uterine carcinosarcoma. Treatment was delivered using a median of 5 fractions to a median total dose of 40 Gy. Targets were grouped by treatment site and assessed for response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Mean biologically effective dose and pre-SABR tumor size were compared with response. Progression-free survival (PFS) was determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and toxicity outcomes were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03.

Results: Median follow-up was 12.8 months. Target locations were 17% liver, 21% lung, 17% paraaortic node, 26% other node, and 19% pelvic soft tissue. After treatment, 34% of targets were stable (SD), 32% had a partial response (PR), 17% had a complete response (CR), and 17% had progressive disease (PD). No failures occurred in lung or nodal targets. Mean ± standard deviation pre-SABR tumor diameter was 24 ± 22 mm. There was a significant difference in mean size between lesions that had a favorable (SD, PR, and CR) versus unfavorable response (PD) (17.2 vs 57.6 mm, P = 0.0044). Lesions that responded favorably were also more likely to have received a higher biologically effective dose (79.0 vs 59.6 Gy, P = 0.027). Median PFS was 10.8 months, and 1 patient experienced grade 3 toxicity.

Conclusions: The SABR is a safe and effective local treatment modality in patients with oligometastatic gynecological disease. Distant progression remains the primary mode of failure in this patient population. In carefully selected patients, a combination of systemic treatment and SABR may offer long-term PFS.

立体定向消融放疗治疗少转移和少进展妇科恶性肿瘤的临床效果。
目的:我们报告用立体定向消融放疗(SABR)治疗女性少转移或进展性妇科恶性肿瘤的单机构临床结果。材料与方法:2009 - 2015年对28例患者47个病灶行SABR治疗并进行回顾性分析。所有患者均为低转移性(93%)或低进行性(7%)疾病。原发癌15例为卵巢癌,8例为子宫内膜癌,2例为子宫颈癌,2例为阴道癌,1例为子宫癌。治疗中位数为5次,中位数总剂量为40戈瑞。靶点按治疗部位分组,使用实体肿瘤反应评价标准v1.1评估疗效。平均生物有效剂量和sabr前肿瘤大小与反应进行比较。使用Kaplan-Meier分析确定无进展生存期(PFS),使用不良事件通用术语标准4.03版对毒性结果进行分级。结果:中位随访时间为12.8个月。靶部位为肝脏17%,肺21%,主动脉旁淋巴结17%,其他淋巴结26%,盆腔软组织19%。治疗后,34%的靶点稳定(SD), 32%部分缓解(PR), 17%完全缓解(CR), 17%疾病进展(PD)。肺或淋巴结靶均未发生失败。sabr前肿瘤直径平均±标准差为24±22 mm。有良好反应(SD、PR和CR)和不良反应(PD)的病变的平均大小有显著差异(17.2 vs 57.6 mm, P = 0.0044)。反应良好的病变也更有可能接受更高的生物有效剂量(79.0 Gy vs 59.6 Gy, P = 0.027)。中位PFS为10.8个月,1例患者出现3级毒性。结论:SABR是妇科少转移性疾病安全有效的局部治疗方式。远处进展仍然是这类患者失败的主要模式。在精心挑选的患者中,系统治疗和SABR的结合可能会提供长期的PFS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书