Volga text: streaming down to definition

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
K.I. Morozova
{"title":"Volga text: streaming down to definition","authors":"K.I. Morozova","doi":"10.18287/2782-2966-2023-3-2-38-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is another attempt to comprehend such a phenomenon as the \"Volga text\". The image of the Volga have been repeatedly studied, but there is still no total research that gives a full and complete reply to the question: What is the Volga text? Especially it concerns A.K. Goldebaevs creative heritage, who remains a little-known or unknown writer for the literary world. In addition, the very phenomenon of the Samara text (the Volga text is its important part) has not been fully studied. All this indicates the undoubted relevance and novelty of the study, the purpose of which is to consider the features of the Volga image functioning in the plots of the works by Goldebaev, M. Gorky, S.G. Petrov and F.D. Kryukov. The leading research methods have been synchronic, diachronic, comparative and structural ones. The empirical material comprised such works as \"Foma Gordeev\", \"Through the Line\", \"Without Fire\", \"Summer Vacation\". The choice of these texts is reasoned by the fact that Goldebaevs documents, stored in the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art, have been found to have extracts, made from them, containing description of the Volga only. And Goldebaevs story is the only work known to the author of the article, which contains a description of the Volga. The article concludes that it is not entirely correct to define Goldebaev's story as a Volga text: the Volga just locates the plot there and hardly participates in the construction.","PeriodicalId":52036,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Semiotic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Semiotic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18287/2782-2966-2023-3-2-38-45","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is another attempt to comprehend such a phenomenon as the "Volga text". The image of the Volga have been repeatedly studied, but there is still no total research that gives a full and complete reply to the question: What is the Volga text? Especially it concerns A.K. Goldebaevs creative heritage, who remains a little-known or unknown writer for the literary world. In addition, the very phenomenon of the Samara text (the Volga text is its important part) has not been fully studied. All this indicates the undoubted relevance and novelty of the study, the purpose of which is to consider the features of the Volga image functioning in the plots of the works by Goldebaev, M. Gorky, S.G. Petrov and F.D. Kryukov. The leading research methods have been synchronic, diachronic, comparative and structural ones. The empirical material comprised such works as "Foma Gordeev", "Through the Line", "Without Fire", "Summer Vacation". The choice of these texts is reasoned by the fact that Goldebaevs documents, stored in the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art, have been found to have extracts, made from them, containing description of the Volga only. And Goldebaevs story is the only work known to the author of the article, which contains a description of the Volga. The article concludes that it is not entirely correct to define Goldebaev's story as a Volga text: the Volga just locates the plot there and hardly participates in the construction.
伏尔加文本:流向定义
本文是理解“伏尔加文本”这一现象的又一尝试。伏尔加河的形象已经被反复研究,但仍然没有一个完整的研究给出一个完整的回答这个问题:伏尔加河的文本是什么?特别是关于A.K.戈尔德巴耶夫的创作遗产,他仍然是文学界鲜为人知或不为人知的作家。此外,萨马拉文本(伏尔加文本是其重要组成部分)的现象尚未得到充分研究。所有这些都表明了这项研究的相关性和新见性,其目的是考虑伏尔加形象在戈尔德巴耶夫、M.高尔基、S.G.彼得罗夫和F.D.克鲁科夫作品情节中的功能特征。主要的研究方法有共时法、历时法、比较法和结构法。实证材料包括《Foma Gordeev》、《Through The Line》、《Without Fire》、《Summer Vacation》等作品。选择这些文本的理由是,存放在俄罗斯国家文学和艺术档案馆的戈尔德巴耶夫的文件被发现有摘录,其中只包含对伏尔加河的描述。这篇文章的作者只知道戈尔德巴耶夫的故事,这篇文章包含了对伏尔加河的描述。文章的结论是,将戈尔德巴耶夫的故事定义为伏尔加文本并不完全正确:伏尔加只是将情节定位在那里,几乎没有参与建设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Semiotic Studies
Chinese Semiotic Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信