Cryptocurrencies and crypto-assets in the Italian and EU perspective

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
R. Lener
{"title":"Cryptocurrencies and crypto-assets in the Italian and EU perspective","authors":"R. Lener","doi":"10.21638/spbu14.2022.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a first critical exam of the approach taken by EU Regulators and Courts regarding cryptoactivities. The purpose of this analysis is to see if a new European regulation on “encrypted” financial services will really be born. The analysis begins with the definition and regulation of Cryptocurrencies, the best of which are probably found in the opinions of supervisory and regulatory bodies. Italian courts dealing with this difficult subject show uncertainty among assets (beni), money (valuta), and financial products. Today the reflection of both Regulators and Courts is expanding from cryptocurrencies to the wider and even more indefinite area of the so-called crypto-assets. In this regard, the most recent and important element is given by the European Commission Proposal of September 24, 2020, concerning regulation of crypto-asset markets (Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets, MiCA). The proposed regulation should apply to crypto-asset issuers, as well as to providers of crypto-asset services on the territory of the European Union. Also in this case, the definition of “cryptoasset” is crucial. New rules provide a fairly generic definition as “digital representations of value or rights that can be transferred or stored electronically using distributed ledger or similar technologies”. To obviate the vagueness of the definition, the only possibility seems to be moving by subtraction, i. e., listing a series of “tools” to which the proposed regulation does not apply, even though these may fall, in theory, in the broad definition of “crypto-asset”.","PeriodicalId":41041,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article provides a first critical exam of the approach taken by EU Regulators and Courts regarding cryptoactivities. The purpose of this analysis is to see if a new European regulation on “encrypted” financial services will really be born. The analysis begins with the definition and regulation of Cryptocurrencies, the best of which are probably found in the opinions of supervisory and regulatory bodies. Italian courts dealing with this difficult subject show uncertainty among assets (beni), money (valuta), and financial products. Today the reflection of both Regulators and Courts is expanding from cryptocurrencies to the wider and even more indefinite area of the so-called crypto-assets. In this regard, the most recent and important element is given by the European Commission Proposal of September 24, 2020, concerning regulation of crypto-asset markets (Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets, MiCA). The proposed regulation should apply to crypto-asset issuers, as well as to providers of crypto-asset services on the territory of the European Union. Also in this case, the definition of “cryptoasset” is crucial. New rules provide a fairly generic definition as “digital representations of value or rights that can be transferred or stored electronically using distributed ledger or similar technologies”. To obviate the vagueness of the definition, the only possibility seems to be moving by subtraction, i. e., listing a series of “tools” to which the proposed regulation does not apply, even though these may fall, in theory, in the broad definition of “crypto-asset”.
意大利和欧盟视角下的加密货币和加密资产
本文对欧盟监管机构和法院对加密货币活动采取的方法进行了首次批判性审查。这一分析的目的是看看欧洲是否真的会出台一项关于“加密”金融服务的新法规。分析从加密货币的定义和监管开始,其中最好的可能是在监管机构的意见中找到的。处理这一棘手问题的意大利法院表现出资产(beni)、货币(valuta)和金融产品之间的不确定性。如今,监管机构和法院的反思正从加密货币扩展到更广泛、甚至更不确定的所谓加密资产领域。在这方面,最新和最重要的因素是欧盟委员会2020年9月24日关于加密资产市场监管的提案(加密资产市场监管,MiCA)。拟议的法规应适用于加密资产发行人,以及欧盟境内的加密资产服务提供商。在这种情况下,“加密资产”的定义也是至关重要的。新规则提供了一个相当通用的定义,即“可以使用分布式账本或类似技术以电子方式转移或存储的价值或权利的数字表示”。为了避免定义的模糊性,唯一的可能性似乎是通过减法来移动,即列出一系列拟议监管不适用的“工具”,尽管从理论上讲,这些工具可能属于“加密资产”的广义定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信