Sensitization to palladium chloride: a 10-year evaluation.

F. Larese Filon, D. Uderzo, E. Bagnato
{"title":"Sensitization to palladium chloride: a 10-year evaluation.","authors":"F. Larese Filon, D. Uderzo, E. Bagnato","doi":"10.1097/01206501-200306000-00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPalladium is increasingly used in industry, jewelry, and dentistry and is becoming more common since the European directive restricting the use of nickel in all products placed in direct and prolonged contact with the skin.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThe role of palladium sensitization is still unclear, and the aim of our study is to evaluate the trend of sensitization in a contact dermatitis clinic population during a 10-year period.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe report our experience with 4,446 patients (3,077 female, 1,369 male; mean age, 40.1 +/-13.7 years) with suspected contact dermatitis patch-tested during the period of 1991 to 2000.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA positive patch-test result to palladium chloride 1% was indicated in 236 patients (5.3%), with a higher percentage in females (6.7%) than in males (2.3%), and the sensitization to this metal has increased over the specified period, to a maximum in the year 2000 (9.7%). In the majority of cases, subjects were polysensitized (92.8%), but 7.2% of subjects were patch-test positive only to palladium. Of palladium-sensitized patients, 40.5% complained of hand dermatitis, 47.4% complained of body dermatitis, and 1.7% complained of burning mouth syndrome. Palladium sensitization is significantly related to female sex (OR = 3.08; 95% CI, 2.07-4.61) and to sensitization to other metals, with a maximum for nickel sulfate (OR = 32.9; 95% CI, 21.3-51.5).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nSensitization to palladium is increasing by the year, reaching high values, but its role in reducing sensitization and symptoms is still unclear because of the frequent cosensitization with nickel and the low number of monosensitized patients with relevant sensitizations. We need to follow palladium sensitization in future years to verify an increase of sensitization due to the increasing use of this metal.","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"86 4 1","pages":"78-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01206501-200306000-00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

BACKGROUND Palladium is increasingly used in industry, jewelry, and dentistry and is becoming more common since the European directive restricting the use of nickel in all products placed in direct and prolonged contact with the skin. OBJECTIVE The role of palladium sensitization is still unclear, and the aim of our study is to evaluate the trend of sensitization in a contact dermatitis clinic population during a 10-year period. METHODS We report our experience with 4,446 patients (3,077 female, 1,369 male; mean age, 40.1 +/-13.7 years) with suspected contact dermatitis patch-tested during the period of 1991 to 2000. RESULTS A positive patch-test result to palladium chloride 1% was indicated in 236 patients (5.3%), with a higher percentage in females (6.7%) than in males (2.3%), and the sensitization to this metal has increased over the specified period, to a maximum in the year 2000 (9.7%). In the majority of cases, subjects were polysensitized (92.8%), but 7.2% of subjects were patch-test positive only to palladium. Of palladium-sensitized patients, 40.5% complained of hand dermatitis, 47.4% complained of body dermatitis, and 1.7% complained of burning mouth syndrome. Palladium sensitization is significantly related to female sex (OR = 3.08; 95% CI, 2.07-4.61) and to sensitization to other metals, with a maximum for nickel sulfate (OR = 32.9; 95% CI, 21.3-51.5). CONCLUSION Sensitization to palladium is increasing by the year, reaching high values, but its role in reducing sensitization and symptoms is still unclear because of the frequent cosensitization with nickel and the low number of monosensitized patients with relevant sensitizations. We need to follow palladium sensitization in future years to verify an increase of sensitization due to the increasing use of this metal.
氯化钯致敏性:10年评价。
背景钯越来越多地用于工业、珠宝和牙科,自从欧洲指令限制在所有与皮肤直接和长时间接触的产品中使用镍以来,钯变得越来越普遍。目的:钯致敏的作用尚不清楚,本研究的目的是评估接触性皮炎临床人群在10年期间的致敏趋势。方法我们报告了4446例患者的经验(女性3077例,男性1369例;平均年龄40.1±13.7岁),1991年至2000年期间经斑贴试验怀疑患有接触性皮炎。结果236例(5.3%)患者对氯化钯的敏化率为1%,其中女性(6.7%)高于男性(2.3%),敏化率在一定时期内呈上升趋势,在2000年达到最高值(9.7%)。在大多数病例中,受试者是多敏化的(92.8%),但7.2%的受试者仅对钯呈斑贴试验阳性。在钯致敏患者中,40.5%的患者有手部皮炎,47.4%的患者有全身皮炎,1.7%的患者有灼口综合征。钯致敏性与女性显著相关(OR = 3.08;95% CI, 2.07-4.61)和对其他金属的敏化,最大的是硫酸镍(OR = 32.9;95% ci, 21.3-51.5)。结论钯的致敏性呈逐年增加趋势,达到较高值,但由于与镍的共致敏频繁,且单致敏患者中有相关致敏的患者较少,其在减轻致敏和症状中的作用尚不清楚。我们需要在未来几年跟踪钯的敏化,以验证由于这种金属的使用增加而增加的敏化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信