Bunkering and information decisions in the sea cargo service industry based on uncertain spot price

Zhuzhu Song, Man Xu, Pingping Chen
{"title":"Bunkering and information decisions in the sea cargo service industry based on uncertain spot price","authors":"Zhuzhu Song, Man Xu, Pingping Chen","doi":"10.1002/nav.22102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pursuit of lower costs and the volatility of spot prices force shipping companies to sign fuel supply contracts with suppliers in advance. Meanwhile, suppliers that take on price risks typically seek further information on spot market prices. Furthermore, they need to consider whether to share the information with shipping companies as such information can affect shipping companies' decision on speed and, hence, their fuel consumption and shipper business. To study the refueling and information issues of the shipping supply chain, we describe a game between a shipping company and a supplier on the basis of a fuel supply contract. Results show that compared with the case without information sharing, the case with information sharing with a possibly lower spot price can bring higher profits for the shipping company and supplier. At this point, the shipping company will increase its navigation speed and benefit from the resulting increase in shipper business. Meanwhile, the supplier can benefit from the shipping company's increased fuel consumption. The supplier decides to share information with the shipping company before receiving signals only when the prediction accuracy is high, indicating that the supplier's prediction motivation is to sway the shipping company's risk assessment. Restricted by prediction costs, the supplier will not improve the prediction accuracy indefinitely, but such improvement can always benefit the shipping company. Hence, information prediction can be a win‐win strategy for the shipping company and supplier.","PeriodicalId":19120,"journal":{"name":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","volume":"10 1 1","pages":"522 - 536"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pursuit of lower costs and the volatility of spot prices force shipping companies to sign fuel supply contracts with suppliers in advance. Meanwhile, suppliers that take on price risks typically seek further information on spot market prices. Furthermore, they need to consider whether to share the information with shipping companies as such information can affect shipping companies' decision on speed and, hence, their fuel consumption and shipper business. To study the refueling and information issues of the shipping supply chain, we describe a game between a shipping company and a supplier on the basis of a fuel supply contract. Results show that compared with the case without information sharing, the case with information sharing with a possibly lower spot price can bring higher profits for the shipping company and supplier. At this point, the shipping company will increase its navigation speed and benefit from the resulting increase in shipper business. Meanwhile, the supplier can benefit from the shipping company's increased fuel consumption. The supplier decides to share information with the shipping company before receiving signals only when the prediction accuracy is high, indicating that the supplier's prediction motivation is to sway the shipping company's risk assessment. Restricted by prediction costs, the supplier will not improve the prediction accuracy indefinitely, but such improvement can always benefit the shipping company. Hence, information prediction can be a win‐win strategy for the shipping company and supplier.
基于不确定现货价格的海运服务加注与信息决策
对低成本的追求和现货价格的波动迫使航运公司提前与供应商签订燃料供应合同。与此同时,承担价格风险的供应商通常会寻求现货市场价格的进一步信息。此外,他们需要考虑是否与航运公司共享这些信息,因为这些信息会影响航运公司对速度的决定,从而影响他们的燃料消耗和托运人业务。为了研究航运供应链中的加油与信息问题,本文描述了基于燃料供应合同的航运公司与供应商之间的博弈。结果表明,与没有信息共享的情况相比,信息共享的情况下,现货价格可能更低,可以为航运公司和供应商带来更高的利润。此时,船公司将提高其航行速度,并从由此带来的托运人业务的增加中受益。同时,供应商可以从航运公司增加的燃料消耗中获益。只有在预测精度较高的情况下,供应商才决定在接收信号之前与船公司共享信息,说明供应商的预测动机是为了影响船公司的风险评估。受预测成本的限制,供应商不会无限期地提高预测精度,但这种提高总是有利于航运公司的。因此,信息预测对于航运公司和供应商来说是一个双赢的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信