Ergonomics in robot-assisted surgery in comparison to open or conventional laparoendoscopic surgery: A narrative review

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
D. Müller, Juliane Ahn, S. Brunner, Julia Poggemeier, Christian Storms, Alissa Reisewitz, T. Schmidt, C. Bruns, H. Fuchs
{"title":"Ergonomics in robot-assisted surgery in comparison to open or conventional laparoendoscopic surgery: A narrative review","authors":"D. Müller, Juliane Ahn, S. Brunner, Julia Poggemeier, Christian Storms, Alissa Reisewitz, T. Schmidt, C. Bruns, H. Fuchs","doi":"10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_52_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although often forgotten in everyday routine and underestimated, especially in a surgical work environment, ergonomics are essential for endurance, efficiency, and a long and healthy work life. According to current studies, the rate of musculoskeletal disorders among minimally invasive surgeons ranges between 23% and 80%, which is lower compared with open surgery (66%–94%), but nevertheless shows the everyday relevance of this topic. An efficient and ergonomic design of the operating room has been widely discussed and guidelines have been imposed to create the optimal workspace. Furthermore, with the implementation of technical advancements and the introduction of robotic operating techniques, ergonomics have become an essential differentiating factor between systems. Surgical ergonomics are not universal but differ between open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. With the introduction of new robotic systems, many ergonomic challenges faced in open and laparoscopic surgeries have been overcome, whereas new challenges have been created. Nevertheless, ergonomics in surgery will need to be addressed and taken seriously, as a healthy workspace has gained more importance than ever.","PeriodicalId":34200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_52_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although often forgotten in everyday routine and underestimated, especially in a surgical work environment, ergonomics are essential for endurance, efficiency, and a long and healthy work life. According to current studies, the rate of musculoskeletal disorders among minimally invasive surgeons ranges between 23% and 80%, which is lower compared with open surgery (66%–94%), but nevertheless shows the everyday relevance of this topic. An efficient and ergonomic design of the operating room has been widely discussed and guidelines have been imposed to create the optimal workspace. Furthermore, with the implementation of technical advancements and the introduction of robotic operating techniques, ergonomics have become an essential differentiating factor between systems. Surgical ergonomics are not universal but differ between open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. With the introduction of new robotic systems, many ergonomic challenges faced in open and laparoscopic surgeries have been overcome, whereas new challenges have been created. Nevertheless, ergonomics in surgery will need to be addressed and taken seriously, as a healthy workspace has gained more importance than ever.
机器人辅助手术的人机工程学与开放或传统腹腔镜手术的比较:叙述性回顾
虽然在日常工作中经常被遗忘和低估,特别是在外科工作环境中,人体工程学对耐力、效率和长期健康的工作生活至关重要。根据目前的研究,微创外科医生的肌肉骨骼疾病发生率在23%至80%之间,低于开放手术(66%-94%),但仍然显示了这一话题的日常相关性。手术室的高效和符合人体工程学的设计已经被广泛讨论,并制定了创建最佳工作空间的指导方针。此外,随着技术进步的实施和机器人操作技术的引入,人体工程学已成为系统之间的基本区分因素。手术人体工程学不是通用的,但在开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人手术之间有所不同。随着新型机器人系统的引入,开放式和腹腔镜手术中面临的许多人体工程学挑战已经被克服,同时也产生了新的挑战。然而,人体工程学在外科手术中需要解决和认真对待,因为健康的工作空间比以往任何时候都更加重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信