A Study on the Development of an Attitude Scale Towards Distance Education

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Fatma Coşkun, H. D. Gülleroğlu
{"title":"A Study on the Development of an Attitude Scale Towards Distance Education","authors":"Fatma Coşkun, H. D. Gülleroğlu","doi":"10.9779/pauefd.1112523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overall aim of this study is to develop “an attitude scale towards distance education\", the validity and reliability of which can be used to measure the attitudes of the teachers who have experienced distance education systems especially during the coronavirus pandemic. For this purpose, first of all, 20 teachers who worked actively in distance education systems during the emergency remote education period were asked to write an essay on their feelings and thoughts about distance education. Then, an item pool consisting of 69 items was created examining these essays written by the teachers and reviewing the relevant literature in detail, Next, these items were presented to the group consisting of assessment and evaluation experts and field experts, and a draft scale form with 29 items was prepared in line with the opinions of the experts. The data of the study were obtained from three different study groups. The data were collected from 250 participants for the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), from 171 participants for the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and from 45 participants for the reliability study. As a result of EFA, the scale structure consisting of 16 items and 3 subdimensions which explain 61% of the total variance and whose factor loading values range between 0.84 and 0.54 emerged. Then, CFA was applied to the 16 items that represent the dimensions of \"being satisfied with distance education\" (8 items), \"being active in distance education\" (4 items), and \"adopting distance education\" (4 items) obtained as a result of EFA. It was concluded that this structure was also confirmed according to the CFA fit indices (X2/sd=1.92, CFI=0.95, GFI=0.88, IFI=0.95, RMSEA=0.007). In the reliability analyses of the ATDES, it was observed that the Cronbach Alpha coefficient varied between 0.77 and 0.92 for the overall scale and its sub-dimensions, and the test-retest reliability ranged between 0.72 and 0.98. In conclusion, it is determined that the ATDES, developed within the scope of this study, is a valid and reliable attitude scale that can be used to measure teachers' attitudes towards distance education.","PeriodicalId":43133,"journal":{"name":"Pamukkale Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi-Pamukkale University Journal of Education","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pamukkale Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi-Pamukkale University Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1112523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The overall aim of this study is to develop “an attitude scale towards distance education", the validity and reliability of which can be used to measure the attitudes of the teachers who have experienced distance education systems especially during the coronavirus pandemic. For this purpose, first of all, 20 teachers who worked actively in distance education systems during the emergency remote education period were asked to write an essay on their feelings and thoughts about distance education. Then, an item pool consisting of 69 items was created examining these essays written by the teachers and reviewing the relevant literature in detail, Next, these items were presented to the group consisting of assessment and evaluation experts and field experts, and a draft scale form with 29 items was prepared in line with the opinions of the experts. The data of the study were obtained from three different study groups. The data were collected from 250 participants for the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), from 171 participants for the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and from 45 participants for the reliability study. As a result of EFA, the scale structure consisting of 16 items and 3 subdimensions which explain 61% of the total variance and whose factor loading values range between 0.84 and 0.54 emerged. Then, CFA was applied to the 16 items that represent the dimensions of "being satisfied with distance education" (8 items), "being active in distance education" (4 items), and "adopting distance education" (4 items) obtained as a result of EFA. It was concluded that this structure was also confirmed according to the CFA fit indices (X2/sd=1.92, CFI=0.95, GFI=0.88, IFI=0.95, RMSEA=0.007). In the reliability analyses of the ATDES, it was observed that the Cronbach Alpha coefficient varied between 0.77 and 0.92 for the overall scale and its sub-dimensions, and the test-retest reliability ranged between 0.72 and 0.98. In conclusion, it is determined that the ATDES, developed within the scope of this study, is a valid and reliable attitude scale that can be used to measure teachers' attitudes towards distance education.
远程教育态度量表的编制研究
本研究的总体目的是制定“远程教育态度量表”,其效度和信度可用于衡量经历过远程教育系统的教师的态度,特别是在冠状病毒大流行期间。为此,首先,20名在紧急远程教育期间积极从事远程教育系统工作的教师被要求写一篇关于他们对远程教育的感受和想法的文章。然后,对教师所写的文章进行审查,并详细查阅相关文献,形成一个包含69个项目的题库,然后将这些项目提交给由评估专家和实地专家组成的小组,并根据专家的意见编制一份包含29个项目的量表草案。该研究的数据来自三个不同的研究组。数据来自250名参与者进行探索性因素分析(EFA), 171名参与者进行验证性因素分析(CFA), 45名参与者进行可靠性研究。结果显示,由16个条目和3个子维度组成的量表结构解释了61%的总方差,其因子负荷值在0.84 ~ 0.54之间。然后,将CFA应用于通过远程教育获得的“对远程教育满意”(8项)、“积极参与远程教育”(4项)和“采用远程教育”(4项)三个维度的16个条目。根据CFA拟合指数(X2/sd=1.92, CFI=0.95, GFI=0.88, IFI=0.95, RMSEA=0.007)也证实了这种结构。在ATDES的信度分析中,总体量表及其子维度的Cronbach Alpha系数在0.77 ~ 0.92之间,重测信度在0.72 ~ 0.98之间。综上所述,本研究范围内开发的ATDES是一个有效可靠的态度量表,可以用来衡量教师对远程教育的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信