Management of hepatitis B virus infection in the pre-transplant setting

Martín Prieto, María García-Eliz
{"title":"Management of hepatitis B virus infection in the pre-transplant setting","authors":"Martín Prieto,&nbsp;María García-Eliz","doi":"10.1016/S1594-5804(11)60018-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Liver transplantation remains the ultimate cure for patients with hepatitis B virus-related end-stage liver disease. Clinical Practice Guidelines currently recommend that patients with decompensated HBV cirrhosis should be treated without delay with nucleos(t)ide analogues regardless of the patient's serum ALT, HBV DNA level, and HBeAg status. The main goal of pre-transplantation antiviral therapy is to achieve a rapid and prolonged suppression of viral replication and thus decrease the risk of hepatitis B virus reinfection of the graft. In addition, sustained negativization of serum HBV DNA may also result in clinical stabilization which can decrease the mortality rate while on the waiting list and delay or avoid liver transplantation in some cases. Clinical improvement may take from 3 to 6 months to become evident. Lamivudine and adefovir are no longer considered first-line therapy in these patients. Potent nucleos(t)ide analogues with good resistance profiles such as entecavir or tenofovir should be used instead. Preliminary data suggest that these agents are effective and have a good safety profile in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. More safety data, however, are needed, particularly in patients with severe impairment of liver function. More data are needed to determine which of the newer antiviral agents offer the best risk–benefit ratio in this challenging patient population. Although a tenofovir-based regimen may be preferred in decompensated patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus, there are some concerns about the long-term safety of tenofovir including nephrotoxicity and metabolic bone disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100375,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease Supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1594-5804(11)60018-1","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive and Liver Disease Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1594580411600181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Liver transplantation remains the ultimate cure for patients with hepatitis B virus-related end-stage liver disease. Clinical Practice Guidelines currently recommend that patients with decompensated HBV cirrhosis should be treated without delay with nucleos(t)ide analogues regardless of the patient's serum ALT, HBV DNA level, and HBeAg status. The main goal of pre-transplantation antiviral therapy is to achieve a rapid and prolonged suppression of viral replication and thus decrease the risk of hepatitis B virus reinfection of the graft. In addition, sustained negativization of serum HBV DNA may also result in clinical stabilization which can decrease the mortality rate while on the waiting list and delay or avoid liver transplantation in some cases. Clinical improvement may take from 3 to 6 months to become evident. Lamivudine and adefovir are no longer considered first-line therapy in these patients. Potent nucleos(t)ide analogues with good resistance profiles such as entecavir or tenofovir should be used instead. Preliminary data suggest that these agents are effective and have a good safety profile in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. More safety data, however, are needed, particularly in patients with severe impairment of liver function. More data are needed to determine which of the newer antiviral agents offer the best risk–benefit ratio in this challenging patient population. Although a tenofovir-based regimen may be preferred in decompensated patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus, there are some concerns about the long-term safety of tenofovir including nephrotoxicity and metabolic bone disease.

移植前乙肝病毒感染的处理
肝移植仍然是乙肝病毒相关终末期肝病患者的最终治疗方法。临床实践指南目前推荐失代偿期HBV肝硬化患者应立即使用核苷(t)类似物治疗,无论患者的血清ALT、HBV DNA水平和HBeAg状态如何。移植前抗病毒治疗的主要目标是实现对病毒复制的快速和持久的抑制,从而降低移植物再感染乙肝病毒的风险。此外,血清HBV DNA的持续阴性也可能导致临床稳定,这可以降低等待名单中的死亡率,并在某些情况下延迟或避免肝移植。临床改善可能需要3至6个月才能显现。拉米夫定和阿德福韦不再被认为是这些患者的一线治疗。具有良好耐药谱的强效核苷类似物,如恩替卡韦或替诺福韦应予以替代。初步数据表明,这些药物对失代偿期肝硬化患者有效且具有良好的安全性。然而,需要更多的安全性数据,特别是在肝功能严重受损的患者中。需要更多的数据来确定哪种较新的抗病毒药物在这一具有挑战性的患者群体中提供最佳的风险-效益比。尽管以替诺福韦为基础的方案可能是拉米夫定耐药乙型肝炎病毒失代偿患者的首选方案,但对替诺福韦的长期安全性存在一些担忧,包括肾毒性和代谢性骨病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信