State and Trait Emotion Regulation Diversity in Social Anxiety.

Innovaciones Educativas Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-28 DOI:10.1177/21677026231151956
Katharine E Daniel, Maria A Larrazabal, Mehdi Boukhechba, Laura Barnes, Bethany A Teachman
{"title":"State and Trait Emotion Regulation Diversity in Social Anxiety.","authors":"Katharine E Daniel, Maria A Larrazabal, Mehdi Boukhechba, Laura Barnes, Bethany A Teachman","doi":"10.1177/21677026231151956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emotion regulation (ER) diversity, defined as the variety, frequency, and evenness of ER strategies used, may predict social anxiety (SA) severity. In a sample of individuals with high (<i>n=</i>113) or low (<i>n</i>=42) SA severity, we tested whether four trait ER diversity metrics predicted group membership. We generalized existing trait ER diversity calculations to repeated-measures data to test if state-level metrics (using two weeks of EMA data) predicted SA severity within the higher severity group. As hypothesized (osf.io/xadyp), higher trait ER diversity within avoidance-oriented strategies predicted greater likelihood of belonging to the higher severity group. At the state-level, higher diversity across all ER strategies, and within and between avoidance- and approach-oriented strategies, predicted higher SA severity (but only after controlling for number of submitted EMAs). Only diversity within avoidance-oriented strategies was significantly correlated across trait and state levels. Findings suggest that high avoidance-oriented ER diversity may co-occur with higher SA severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":30804,"journal":{"name":"Innovaciones Educativas","volume":"22 1","pages":"894-909"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovaciones Educativas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026231151956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emotion regulation (ER) diversity, defined as the variety, frequency, and evenness of ER strategies used, may predict social anxiety (SA) severity. In a sample of individuals with high (n=113) or low (n=42) SA severity, we tested whether four trait ER diversity metrics predicted group membership. We generalized existing trait ER diversity calculations to repeated-measures data to test if state-level metrics (using two weeks of EMA data) predicted SA severity within the higher severity group. As hypothesized (osf.io/xadyp), higher trait ER diversity within avoidance-oriented strategies predicted greater likelihood of belonging to the higher severity group. At the state-level, higher diversity across all ER strategies, and within and between avoidance- and approach-oriented strategies, predicted higher SA severity (but only after controlling for number of submitted EMAs). Only diversity within avoidance-oriented strategies was significantly correlated across trait and state levels. Findings suggest that high avoidance-oriented ER diversity may co-occur with higher SA severity.

社交焦虑的状态和特质情绪调节多样性。
情绪调节(ER)多样性,定义为所使用的ER策略的多样性、频率和均匀性,可以预测社交焦虑(SA)的严重程度。在SA严重程度高(n=113)或低(n=42)的个体样本中,我们测试了四种ER多样性指标是否能预测群体成员。我们将现有的性状内质网多样性计算推广到重复测量数据,以测试州级指标(使用两周的EMA数据)是否预测了较高严重程度组中的SA严重程度。正如假设(osf.io/xadyp)所述,回避导向策略中较高的特质ER多样性预示着更大的可能性属于更严重的群体。在州一级,所有ER策略之间以及回避和方法导向策略内部和之间的多样性较高,预示着更高的SA严重程度(但仅在控制提交的ema数量之后)。只有回避导向策略的多样性在特质和状态水平上显著相关。研究结果表明,高回避型内质网多样性可能与高SA严重程度同时发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信