Effects of an extended flexible regimen of an oral contraceptive pill containing 20 μg ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone on menstrual-related symptoms: a randomised controlled trial

R. B. Machado, L. Pompei, M. Badalotti, R. Ferriani, A. Cruz, Eliana Nahas, H. Maia
{"title":"Effects of an extended flexible regimen of an oral contraceptive pill containing 20 μg ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone on menstrual-related symptoms: a randomised controlled trial","authors":"R. B. Machado, L. Pompei, M. Badalotti, R. Ferriani, A. Cruz, Eliana Nahas, H. Maia","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2016.1239077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy for menstrual-related symptoms of an extended flexible regimen of an oral contraceptive pill containing 20 μg ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone in comparison with a 24/4 d cyclical regimen of the same formulation. Methods: This randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, multicentre study was conducted in women aged 18–39 years. Their menstrual-related symptoms were assessed using the Penn Daily Symptom Rating (DSR17). Participants were randomised to use an extended flexible regimen of 20 μg ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone (EE/DRSPe.flex), comprising 168 consecutive days with a 4-d hormone-free interval (HFI, allowing for management of unexpected bleeding) or a conventional 24/4 cyclical regimen of the same pill (EE/DRSP24/4). The primary measure of efficacy was the percentage change in DSR17 total score from baseline to cycle 6. The secondary measures of efficacy were the percentage changes in DSR17 total score from baseline after each 28-d interval throughout the entire study and in the scores for individual DSR17 symptoms. Results: The primary analysis demonstrated that EE/DRSPe.flex was not inferior to EE/DRSP24/4 (Mean DSR17 score 9.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) − 2.5, 20.6; p = 0.123). Analysis at intervals throughout the entire evaluation period showed greater reduction in DSR17 total score for EE/DRSPe.flex than for the 24/4 regimen (p < 0.001). The decreases in individual scores for the symptoms ‘poor coordination’ and ‘depression/feeling sad/down or blue’ were greater for the extended flexible regimen than for the cyclical regimen (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The extended flexible regimen was not inferior to the 24/4 cyclical regimen in terms of the primary endpoint. It significantly improved symptoms in the interval analysis, and the effects on specific DSR17 symptoms, compared with the cyclical regimen.","PeriodicalId":22423,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","volume":"29 1","pages":"11 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2016.1239077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy for menstrual-related symptoms of an extended flexible regimen of an oral contraceptive pill containing 20 μg ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone in comparison with a 24/4 d cyclical regimen of the same formulation. Methods: This randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, multicentre study was conducted in women aged 18–39 years. Their menstrual-related symptoms were assessed using the Penn Daily Symptom Rating (DSR17). Participants were randomised to use an extended flexible regimen of 20 μg ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone (EE/DRSPe.flex), comprising 168 consecutive days with a 4-d hormone-free interval (HFI, allowing for management of unexpected bleeding) or a conventional 24/4 cyclical regimen of the same pill (EE/DRSP24/4). The primary measure of efficacy was the percentage change in DSR17 total score from baseline to cycle 6. The secondary measures of efficacy were the percentage changes in DSR17 total score from baseline after each 28-d interval throughout the entire study and in the scores for individual DSR17 symptoms. Results: The primary analysis demonstrated that EE/DRSPe.flex was not inferior to EE/DRSP24/4 (Mean DSR17 score 9.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) − 2.5, 20.6; p = 0.123). Analysis at intervals throughout the entire evaluation period showed greater reduction in DSR17 total score for EE/DRSPe.flex than for the 24/4 regimen (p < 0.001). The decreases in individual scores for the symptoms ‘poor coordination’ and ‘depression/feeling sad/down or blue’ were greater for the extended flexible regimen than for the cyclical regimen (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The extended flexible regimen was not inferior to the 24/4 cyclical regimen in terms of the primary endpoint. It significantly improved symptoms in the interval analysis, and the effects on specific DSR17 symptoms, compared with the cyclical regimen.
含有20 μg炔雌醇和3 mg屈螺酮的口服避孕药扩展灵活方案对月经相关症状的影响:一项随机对照试验
摘要目的:本研究的目的是评估含有20 μg炔雌醇和3 mg drospirenone的口服避孕药延长弹性方案与相同配方的24/4 d周期方案的月经相关症状的疗效。方法:这项随机、非劣效性、开放标签、多中心研究在18-39岁的女性中进行。使用Penn每日症状评分(DSR17)评估他们的月经相关症状。参与者被随机分配使用20 μg炔雌醇和3毫克屈螺酮(EE/ drsp .flex)的扩展灵活方案,包括连续168天,其中4天无激素间隔(HFI,允许管理意外出血)或同一药丸的常规24/4周期方案(EE/DRSP24/4)。疗效的主要测量指标是DSR17总分从基线到第6周期的百分比变化。疗效的次要测量是在整个研究中每隔28天间隔后DSR17总分与基线的百分比变化以及个体DSR17症状的评分。结果:初步分析表明EE/DRSPe。flex不低于EE/DRSP24/4(平均DSR17评分9.1;95%置信区间(CI)−2.5,20.6;p = 0.123)。在整个评估期间的间隔分析显示,EE/DRSPe的DSR17总分下降幅度更大。比24/4方案更灵活(p < 0.001)。在“协调能力差”和“抑郁/感到悲伤/沮丧或忧郁”症状的个体得分上,延长灵活方案的下降幅度大于周期方案(p < 0.05)。结论:在主要终点方面,延长灵活方案不逊于24/4周期方案。与周期方案相比,它在间隔分析中显著改善了症状,并对特定DSR17症状产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信