Mitochondrial genes from 18 angiosperms fill sampling gaps for phylogenomic inferences of the early diversification of flowering plants

IF 3.7
J. Xue, S. Dong, Ming‐Qiang Wang, Tianqiang Song, G. Zhou, Zhen Li, Y. Van de Peer, Zhu-Qing Shao, Wen Wang, Min Chen, Yan-mei Zhang, Xiaoqin Sun, Hongfeng Chen, Yongxia Zhang, Shouzhou Zhang, Fei Chen, Liangsheng Zhang, C. Cox, Yang Liu, Qiang Wang, Y. Hang
{"title":"Mitochondrial genes from 18 angiosperms fill sampling gaps for phylogenomic inferences of the early diversification of flowering plants","authors":"J. Xue, S. Dong, Ming‐Qiang Wang, Tianqiang Song, G. Zhou, Zhen Li, Y. Van de Peer, Zhu-Qing Shao, Wen Wang, Min Chen, Yan-mei Zhang, Xiaoqin Sun, Hongfeng Chen, Yongxia Zhang, Shouzhou Zhang, Fei Chen, Liangsheng Zhang, C. Cox, Yang Liu, Qiang Wang, Y. Hang","doi":"10.1111/jse.12708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The early diversification of angiosperms is thought to have been a rapid process, which may complicate phylogenetic analyses of early angiosperm relationships. Plastid and nuclear phylogenomic studies have raised several conflicting hypotheses regarding overall angiosperm phylogeny, but mitochondrial genomes have been largely ignored as a relevant source of information. Here we sequenced mitochondrial genomes from 18 angiosperms to fill taxon‐sampling gaps in Austrobaileyales, magnoliids, Chloranthales, Ceratophyllales, and major lineages of eudicots and monocots. We assembled a data matrix of 38 mitochondrial genes from 107 taxa to assess how well mitochondrial genomic data address current uncertainties in angiosperm relationships. Although we recovered conflicting phylogenies based on different data sets and analytical methods, we also observed congruence regarding deep relationships of several major angiosperm lineages: Chloranthales were always inferred to be the sister group of Ceratophyllales, Austrobaileyales to mesangiosperms, and the unplaced Dilleniales was consistently resolved as the sister to superasterids. Substitutional saturation, GC compositional heterogeneity, and codon‐usage bias are possible reasons for the noise/conflict that may impact phylogenetic reconstruction; and angiosperm mitochondrial genes may not be substantially affected by these factors. The third codon positions of the mitochondrial genes appear to contain more parsimony‐informative sites than the first and second codon positions, and therefore produced better resolved phylogenetic relationships with generally strong support. The relationships among these major lineages remain incompletely resolved, perhaps as a result of the rapidity of early radiations. Nevertheless, data from mitochondrial genomes provide additional evidence and alternative hypotheses for exploring the early evolution and diversification of the angiosperms.","PeriodicalId":101317,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION","volume":"202 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The early diversification of angiosperms is thought to have been a rapid process, which may complicate phylogenetic analyses of early angiosperm relationships. Plastid and nuclear phylogenomic studies have raised several conflicting hypotheses regarding overall angiosperm phylogeny, but mitochondrial genomes have been largely ignored as a relevant source of information. Here we sequenced mitochondrial genomes from 18 angiosperms to fill taxon‐sampling gaps in Austrobaileyales, magnoliids, Chloranthales, Ceratophyllales, and major lineages of eudicots and monocots. We assembled a data matrix of 38 mitochondrial genes from 107 taxa to assess how well mitochondrial genomic data address current uncertainties in angiosperm relationships. Although we recovered conflicting phylogenies based on different data sets and analytical methods, we also observed congruence regarding deep relationships of several major angiosperm lineages: Chloranthales were always inferred to be the sister group of Ceratophyllales, Austrobaileyales to mesangiosperms, and the unplaced Dilleniales was consistently resolved as the sister to superasterids. Substitutional saturation, GC compositional heterogeneity, and codon‐usage bias are possible reasons for the noise/conflict that may impact phylogenetic reconstruction; and angiosperm mitochondrial genes may not be substantially affected by these factors. The third codon positions of the mitochondrial genes appear to contain more parsimony‐informative sites than the first and second codon positions, and therefore produced better resolved phylogenetic relationships with generally strong support. The relationships among these major lineages remain incompletely resolved, perhaps as a result of the rapidity of early radiations. Nevertheless, data from mitochondrial genomes provide additional evidence and alternative hypotheses for exploring the early evolution and diversification of the angiosperms.
来自18种被子植物的线粒体基因填补了开花植物早期多样化系统基因组推断的采样空白
被子植物的早期多样化被认为是一个快速的过程,这可能使早期被子植物关系的系统发育分析复杂化。质体和核系统基因组学研究已经提出了几个相互矛盾的关于被子植物系统发育的假设,但线粒体基因组作为相关的信息来源在很大程度上被忽视了。本文对18种被子植物的线粒体基因组进行了测序,填补了Austrobaileyales, magnoliids, Chloranthales, Ceratophyllales以及主要的单子科和单子科谱系的分类单元采样空白。我们收集了来自107个类群的38个线粒体基因的数据矩阵,以评估线粒体基因组数据如何很好地解决当前被子植物关系中的不确定性。虽然我们根据不同的数据集和分析方法恢复了相互矛盾的系统发育,但我们也观察到几个主要被子植物谱系的深层关系是一致的:Chloranthales总是被推断为Ceratophyllales的姐妹类群,austrrobaileyales是mes被子植物的姐妹类群,而未被放置的Dilleniales一直被认为是超asterids的姐妹类群。取代饱和、GC组成异质性和密码子使用偏差是可能影响系统发育重建的噪声/冲突的可能原因;而被子植物的线粒体基因可能不会受到这些因素的实质性影响。线粒体基因的第三个密码子位置似乎比第一和第二个密码子位置包含更多的简约性信息位点,因此产生了更好的解决系统发育关系,通常具有强大的支持。这些主要谱系之间的关系仍然没有完全解决,也许是由于早期辐射的迅速。然而,来自线粒体基因组的数据为探索被子植物的早期进化和多样化提供了额外的证据和替代假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信