Carolina Santos Ventura de Souza, R. Ortega-Lopes, Andres Caceres-Barreno, M. de Moraes, J. D. de Albergaria-Barbosa, C. F. Noia
{"title":"Analysis of the survival of dental implants installed in maxillae reconstructed with autogenous iliac crest grafts - 7-9 years follow-up.","authors":"Carolina Santos Ventura de Souza, R. Ortega-Lopes, Andres Caceres-Barreno, M. de Moraes, J. D. de Albergaria-Barbosa, C. F. Noia","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to analyze the survival of dental implants installed in maxillae reconstructed with autogenous iliac crest grafts, and to assess patient satisfaction with the treatment by means of a questionnaire. The study conducted medical record reviews and clinical/radiographic assessments of 10 patients with severe maxillary atrophy who had undergone reconstruction with autogenous iliac crest grafts and rehabilitation with dental implants between 2008 and 2011. Patients were assessed for the survival of the implants, considering: implant diameter and length, smoking status, diagnosis of diabetes, type of loss and region of implant loss. In addition, a questionnaire with specific questions on the patients' satisfaction with the treatment was administered. Seventy-six implants were installed in the sampled patients and only one loss was observed (late loss in the anterior maxilla region) after an average follow-up of 7.9 years, which corresponds to a 98.60% survival rate. The installed implants were of the most frequently-used dimension (3.75x10mm).One sampled patient was diabetic and a second patient was both diabetic and a smoker. No loss of implants was observed in these two patients. All patients reported being completely satisfied with the treatment and would undergo the procedure again or refer it to a friend/relative. Six patients reported regular maintenance of the prosthesis and only 3 had changed the prosthesis prior to the time of questionnaire administration. The results of this limited study with a restricted sample population suggest that the reconstruction of the maxilla with an autogenous iliac crest graft provides both adequate implant survival and patient satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":77634,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral implantology : implantologist","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral implantology : implantologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the survival of dental implants installed in maxillae reconstructed with autogenous iliac crest grafts, and to assess patient satisfaction with the treatment by means of a questionnaire. The study conducted medical record reviews and clinical/radiographic assessments of 10 patients with severe maxillary atrophy who had undergone reconstruction with autogenous iliac crest grafts and rehabilitation with dental implants between 2008 and 2011. Patients were assessed for the survival of the implants, considering: implant diameter and length, smoking status, diagnosis of diabetes, type of loss and region of implant loss. In addition, a questionnaire with specific questions on the patients' satisfaction with the treatment was administered. Seventy-six implants were installed in the sampled patients and only one loss was observed (late loss in the anterior maxilla region) after an average follow-up of 7.9 years, which corresponds to a 98.60% survival rate. The installed implants were of the most frequently-used dimension (3.75x10mm).One sampled patient was diabetic and a second patient was both diabetic and a smoker. No loss of implants was observed in these two patients. All patients reported being completely satisfied with the treatment and would undergo the procedure again or refer it to a friend/relative. Six patients reported regular maintenance of the prosthesis and only 3 had changed the prosthesis prior to the time of questionnaire administration. The results of this limited study with a restricted sample population suggest that the reconstruction of the maxilla with an autogenous iliac crest graft provides both adequate implant survival and patient satisfaction.