Perceptions of Ethical Leadership and the Ethical Environment and Culture: IntegratedEthicsTM Staff Survey Data from the VA Health Care System

M. Foglia, Jennifer Cohen, R. Pearlman, M. Bottrell, E. Fox
{"title":"Perceptions of Ethical Leadership and the Ethical Environment and Culture: IntegratedEthicsTM Staff Survey Data from the VA Health Care System","authors":"M. Foglia, Jennifer Cohen, R. Pearlman, M. Bottrell, E. Fox","doi":"10.1080/21507716.2012.751070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To enhance understanding of ethical leadership and the ethical environment and culture (EL/EEC) in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system, we mapped selected questions from the VA IntegratedEthics™ Staff Survey (IESS), a national survey of employees’ perceptions of ethical practices, to the Ethical Leadership Compass Points (ELC), a tool to help leaders cultivate an environment and culture that makes it easy for employees to “do the right thing.” The ELC distills insights and principles from organizational and business ethics and provides leaders with specific behaviors that can be incorporated into daily administrative routines. Methods: We analyzed the responses of 88,605 VA employees to the 2010 IESS questions that previously were mapped to the ELC. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize overall distribution of responses to the survey questions, and Pearson's chi-squared tests were performed to assess differences in responses by employee characteristics. Multiple regression analyses examined the association between perceptions of EL/EEC and perceptions of the organizations’ overall ethics quality. Results: Physicians and employees with a higher level of supervisory responsibility were more likely to have the most positive perceptions of EL/EEC and the organization's overall ethics quality. More than three-quarters of the variation in perceptions of overall ethics quality was explained by employee perceptions of EL/EEC. The IESS questions that showed the largest associations with perceptions of overall ethics quality addressed fair allocation of resources across programs and services, avoidance of mixed messages that create ethical uncertainty or conflict, fair treatment of employees, and following up on ethical concerns reported by employees. Conclusions: These results support the important relationships between ethical leadership, an organization's environment and culture, and overall ethics quality. Certain ethical leadership practices may have a larger impact on employees’ perceptions of overall ethics quality than others.","PeriodicalId":89316,"journal":{"name":"AJOB primary research","volume":"8 1","pages":"44 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB primary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2012.751070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: To enhance understanding of ethical leadership and the ethical environment and culture (EL/EEC) in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system, we mapped selected questions from the VA IntegratedEthics™ Staff Survey (IESS), a national survey of employees’ perceptions of ethical practices, to the Ethical Leadership Compass Points (ELC), a tool to help leaders cultivate an environment and culture that makes it easy for employees to “do the right thing.” The ELC distills insights and principles from organizational and business ethics and provides leaders with specific behaviors that can be incorporated into daily administrative routines. Methods: We analyzed the responses of 88,605 VA employees to the 2010 IESS questions that previously were mapped to the ELC. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize overall distribution of responses to the survey questions, and Pearson's chi-squared tests were performed to assess differences in responses by employee characteristics. Multiple regression analyses examined the association between perceptions of EL/EEC and perceptions of the organizations’ overall ethics quality. Results: Physicians and employees with a higher level of supervisory responsibility were more likely to have the most positive perceptions of EL/EEC and the organization's overall ethics quality. More than three-quarters of the variation in perceptions of overall ethics quality was explained by employee perceptions of EL/EEC. The IESS questions that showed the largest associations with perceptions of overall ethics quality addressed fair allocation of resources across programs and services, avoidance of mixed messages that create ethical uncertainty or conflict, fair treatment of employees, and following up on ethical concerns reported by employees. Conclusions: These results support the important relationships between ethical leadership, an organization's environment and culture, and overall ethics quality. Certain ethical leadership practices may have a larger impact on employees’ perceptions of overall ethics quality than others.
道德领导与道德环境和文化的感知:来自退伍军人医疗保健系统的综合道德管理人员调查数据
背景:为了加强对退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗保健系统中道德领导和道德环境与文化(EL/EEC)的理解,我们将VA integrateethics™员工调查(IESS)中的选定问题映射到道德领导指南针点(ELC)中,这是一项关于员工对道德实践的看法的全国性调查,这是一个帮助领导者培养环境和文化的工具,使员工更容易“做正确的事”。ELC从组织和商业道德中提炼出见解和原则,并为领导者提供可以纳入日常管理程序的具体行为。方法:我们分析了88605名VA员工对2010年IESS问题的回答,这些问题之前被映射到ELC。使用描述性统计来描述调查问题回答的总体分布,并使用Pearson卡方检验来评估员工特征回答的差异。多元回归分析检验了EL/EEC感知与组织整体道德质量感知之间的关联。结果:具有较高监督责任水平的医生和员工更有可能对EL/EEC和组织的整体道德质量产生最积极的看法。员工对EL/EEC的看法可以解释超过四分之三的整体道德质量观念差异。与整体道德质量感知关联最大的IESS问题涉及跨项目和服务的资源公平分配,避免产生道德不确定性或冲突的混合信息,公平对待员工,以及跟进员工报告的道德问题。结论:这些结果支持伦理领导、组织环境和文化以及整体伦理质量之间的重要关系。某些道德领导实践可能比其他实践对员工对整体道德质量的看法产生更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信