The cross-cultural study of Diabetes Caregiver Activity and Support Scale

Lanyan Ding, Ze-qing Wang
{"title":"The cross-cultural study of Diabetes Caregiver Activity and Support Scale","authors":"Lanyan Ding, Ze-qing Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN211501-20190627-01792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTranslate and debug Diabetes Caregiver Activity and Support Scale (D-CASS) and to test its reliability and validity in family caregivers of diabetes. \n \n \nMethods \nThe original version of D-CASS was translated according to Brislin model. A total of 330 family caregivers for diabetes were chosen by convenience sampling in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital and Tianjin Medical university Metabolic Disease Hospital (Chu Tianjin Medical University Zhu Xianyi Memorial Hospital) in the period of August 2018 to January 2019 to assess construct validity through exploratory factor analysis(EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Item analysis, Cronbach alpha coefficients, test-retest reliability and the split-half reliability were conducted to test the psychometric properties of the scale. \n \n \nResults \nThere were 11 items in the Chinese version of D-CASS, with 2 common factors extracted by EFA, accounting for 56.623% of the variance. The modified model fitted well with the data through CFA. The coefficient of Cronbach's ɑ for the total D-CASS and the two dimensions was 0.881,0.819 and 0.835 respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.900 (P<0.01) for the overall scale, and each dimension were 0.823 and 0.883; the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.840, each dimension was 0.822 and 0.806. \n \n \nConclusions \nIt indicated that the Chinese version of D-CASS was valid and reliable for the evaluation of family caregiver activity and support for diabetes. \n \n \nKey words: \nDiabetes mellitus; Family caregiver; Reliability; Validity","PeriodicalId":22999,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of practical nursing","volume":"43 4 1","pages":"663-669"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of practical nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN211501-20190627-01792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Translate and debug Diabetes Caregiver Activity and Support Scale (D-CASS) and to test its reliability and validity in family caregivers of diabetes. Methods The original version of D-CASS was translated according to Brislin model. A total of 330 family caregivers for diabetes were chosen by convenience sampling in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital and Tianjin Medical university Metabolic Disease Hospital (Chu Tianjin Medical University Zhu Xianyi Memorial Hospital) in the period of August 2018 to January 2019 to assess construct validity through exploratory factor analysis(EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Item analysis, Cronbach alpha coefficients, test-retest reliability and the split-half reliability were conducted to test the psychometric properties of the scale. Results There were 11 items in the Chinese version of D-CASS, with 2 common factors extracted by EFA, accounting for 56.623% of the variance. The modified model fitted well with the data through CFA. The coefficient of Cronbach's ɑ for the total D-CASS and the two dimensions was 0.881,0.819 and 0.835 respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.900 (P<0.01) for the overall scale, and each dimension were 0.823 and 0.883; the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.840, each dimension was 0.822 and 0.806. Conclusions It indicated that the Chinese version of D-CASS was valid and reliable for the evaluation of family caregiver activity and support for diabetes. Key words: Diabetes mellitus; Family caregiver; Reliability; Validity
糖尿病照顾者活动与支持量表的跨文化研究
目的翻译并调试《糖尿病照顾者活动与支持量表》(D-CASS),检验其在糖尿病家庭照顾者中的信度和效度。方法采用Brislin模型对D-CASS原版本进行翻译。采用方便抽样的方法,于2018年8月至2019年1月在天津医科大学总医院和天津医科大学代谢病医院(初天津医科大学朱先义纪念医院)选取330名糖尿病家庭护理人员,通过探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)评估结构效度。采用项目分析、Cronbach alpha系数、重测信度和分半信度对量表的心理测量特性进行检验。结果中文版D-CASS量表共包含11个条目,EFA提取共有因子2个,占方差的56.623%。经CFA检验,修正后的模型与数据拟合较好。总D-CASS和两个维度的Cronbach's系数分别为0.881、0.819和0.835。总体量表的重测信度为0.900 (P<0.01),各维度分别为0.823和0.883;分半信度系数为0.840,各维度分别为0.822和0.806。结论中文版D-CASS量表用于糖尿病家庭照顾者活动和支持的评价是有效、可靠的。关键词:糖尿病;家庭照顾者;可靠性;有效性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信