Opinion forming in the digital age

Steve Taylor, B. Pickering, P. Grace, M. Boniface, V. Bakir, D. Boyd, Sven Engesser, R. Epstein, N. Fawzi, Philip M. Fernbach, D. Fisher, B. Gardner, Kristof Jacobs, S. Jacobson, Benjamin Krmer, A. Kucharski, Andrew McStay, H. Mercier, Miriam J. Metzger, Francesca Polletta, Walter Quattrociocchi, S. Sloman, D. Sperber, C. Spierings, C. Wardle, Fabiana Zollo, A. Zubiaga
{"title":"Opinion forming in the digital age","authors":"Steve Taylor, B. Pickering, P. Grace, M. Boniface, V. Bakir, D. Boyd, Sven Engesser, R. Epstein, N. Fawzi, Philip M. Fernbach, D. Fisher, B. Gardner, Kristof Jacobs, S. Jacobson, Benjamin Krmer, A. Kucharski, Andrew McStay, H. Mercier, Miriam J. Metzger, Francesca Polletta, Walter Quattrociocchi, S. Sloman, D. Sperber, C. Spierings, C. Wardle, Fabiana Zollo, A. Zubiaga","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.1468575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Internet provides fast and ubiquitous communication that enables all kinds of communities and provides citizens with easy access to vast amounts of information, although the information is not necessarily verified and may present a distorted view of real events or facts. The Internet’s power as an instant source of mass information can be used to influence opinions, which can have far-reaching consequences. This report’s purpose is to provide input into the advisory processes that determine European support for research into the effects and management of Fake News (e.g. deliberate misinformation), Echo Chambers (e.g. closed communities where biases can be reinforced through lack of diversity in opinions), and the Internet’s influence on social and political movements such as Populism; to provide insight into how innovation that takes these aspects into account can be supported. To address this aim, this report concerns socio-technical implications of the Internet related to the impact of closed communities and misinformation and makes recommendations derived from a consultation with domain experts concerning the research needed to address specific challenges. This study has used the Delphi Method, an iterative consultation mechanism aimed at consensus building within a targeted panel of experts. Three rounds of iteration were undertaken and a total of fourteen experts participated in all three rounds. The result of the consultation is 67 assertion statements that reached consensus amongst the experts in five broad themes, and these are presented in this report and summarised into key recommendations. The key overarching recommendation is that we need to understand how opinions are formed and are influenced in the current digital age. Investigations are needed to understand the underlying cognitive and emotional processes that enable peoples’ opinions to be influenced in the context of a hybrid media system that mixes online and offline channels and broadcast and interactive social media.","PeriodicalId":10841,"journal":{"name":"CTIT technical reports series","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CTIT technical reports series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1468575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The Internet provides fast and ubiquitous communication that enables all kinds of communities and provides citizens with easy access to vast amounts of information, although the information is not necessarily verified and may present a distorted view of real events or facts. The Internet’s power as an instant source of mass information can be used to influence opinions, which can have far-reaching consequences. This report’s purpose is to provide input into the advisory processes that determine European support for research into the effects and management of Fake News (e.g. deliberate misinformation), Echo Chambers (e.g. closed communities where biases can be reinforced through lack of diversity in opinions), and the Internet’s influence on social and political movements such as Populism; to provide insight into how innovation that takes these aspects into account can be supported. To address this aim, this report concerns socio-technical implications of the Internet related to the impact of closed communities and misinformation and makes recommendations derived from a consultation with domain experts concerning the research needed to address specific challenges. This study has used the Delphi Method, an iterative consultation mechanism aimed at consensus building within a targeted panel of experts. Three rounds of iteration were undertaken and a total of fourteen experts participated in all three rounds. The result of the consultation is 67 assertion statements that reached consensus amongst the experts in five broad themes, and these are presented in this report and summarised into key recommendations. The key overarching recommendation is that we need to understand how opinions are formed and are influenced in the current digital age. Investigations are needed to understand the underlying cognitive and emotional processes that enable peoples’ opinions to be influenced in the context of a hybrid media system that mixes online and offline channels and broadcast and interactive social media.
数字时代的意见形成
互联网提供了快速和无处不在的通信,使各种社区和公民能够轻松获取大量信息,尽管这些信息不一定经过核实,可能对真实事件或事实有歪曲的看法。互联网作为海量信息的即时来源,可以用来影响舆论,从而产生深远的影响。本报告的目的是为咨询过程提供投入,以确定欧洲对假新闻(例如故意的错误信息)、回音室(例如由于缺乏意见多样性而可能加强偏见的封闭社区)的影响和管理研究的支持,以及互联网对民粹主义等社会和政治运动的影响;提供如何支持将这些方面考虑在内的创新的见解。为了实现这一目标,本报告关注与封闭社区和错误信息的影响有关的互联网的社会技术影响,并就解决具体挑战所需的研究与领域专家进行磋商后提出建议。本研究使用了德尔菲法,这是一种旨在在有针对性的专家小组内建立共识的迭代咨询机制。进行了三轮迭代,总共有14名专家参加了所有三轮。协商的结果是专家们就五个大主题达成共识的67项声明,这些声明已在本报告中提出,并总结为主要建议。最重要的建议是,我们需要了解在当前的数字时代,意见是如何形成和受到影响的。需要进行调查,以了解在在线和离线渠道以及广播和互动社交媒体混合的混合媒体系统背景下,使人们的意见受到影响的潜在认知和情感过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信