5PSQ-193 Patient safety in medication dispensing performed by pharmaconomists: a before and after study

C. Sorensen, L. Aggergaard, B Dorthe Krogsgaard
{"title":"5PSQ-193 Patient safety in medication dispensing performed by pharmaconomists: a before and after study","authors":"C. Sorensen, L. Aggergaard, B Dorthe Krogsgaard","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance High patient safety is a top priority in healthcare systems worldwide. To secure high patient safety, previous research have focused on different medication concepts (eg, automatic medication dispensing, nurse led medication dispensing or self-administration by patients). However, resources are scarce and decision makers want the most ‘value for money’. Therefore, hospital managers investigated the patient safety of medication dispensing performed by pharmaconomists (pharmacy technician with a 3 year degree (180 European credit transfer system points)) compared with nurses. Aim and objectives To evaluate patient safety of ward level medication dispensing performed by pharmaconomists compared with nurse led medication dispensing. Material and methods Medication dispensing by pharmaconomists was implemented at seven hospital wards in January 2020. The study was designed as a before and after study. The proportion of ward level dispensing errors was collected through disguised observation of nurses and pharmaconomists in the medicine room before and after implementation of pharmaconomist led medication dispensing. Before data (control group) stem from a PhD study (by the main author) at the same hospital. These data were collected in 2017–2018 by observing 37 nurses in one ward. After data (intervention group) were collected in March and June 2020. After data were collected in seven wards, to increase the number of pharmaconomists observed (9 instead of only 1) and thus increase generalisability. The collection of after data was performed over two periods due to COVID-19 restrictions at the hospital. A dispensing error was defined as a deviation between the prescription and the dispensed medication (eg, wrong dose). Opportunity for errors (OEs) was defined as any medication dispensed and any medication prescribed but not dispensed. Dispensing error proportion=(dispensing errors/OEs) × 100%. Results In the control group (before data), 1028 OEs were observed, covering 120 patients. In the intervention group (after data), 1036 OEs were observed, covering 122 patients. The dispensing error proportion was 2.2% (95% CI 1.4 to 3.3%) in the intervention group (23 errors) compared with 12.8% (95% CI 10.9 to 15.0) in the control group (132 errors). The difference between groups was statistically significant (p=0.00). Conclusion and relevance As pharmaconomists made fewer dispensing errors compared with nurse led medication dispensing, the results indicate high patient safety when medication is dispensed by pharmaconomists. Medication dispensing by pharmaconomists may therefore be a safe alternative to nurse led medication dispensing. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11991,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Science and Practice","volume":"40 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance High patient safety is a top priority in healthcare systems worldwide. To secure high patient safety, previous research have focused on different medication concepts (eg, automatic medication dispensing, nurse led medication dispensing or self-administration by patients). However, resources are scarce and decision makers want the most ‘value for money’. Therefore, hospital managers investigated the patient safety of medication dispensing performed by pharmaconomists (pharmacy technician with a 3 year degree (180 European credit transfer system points)) compared with nurses. Aim and objectives To evaluate patient safety of ward level medication dispensing performed by pharmaconomists compared with nurse led medication dispensing. Material and methods Medication dispensing by pharmaconomists was implemented at seven hospital wards in January 2020. The study was designed as a before and after study. The proportion of ward level dispensing errors was collected through disguised observation of nurses and pharmaconomists in the medicine room before and after implementation of pharmaconomist led medication dispensing. Before data (control group) stem from a PhD study (by the main author) at the same hospital. These data were collected in 2017–2018 by observing 37 nurses in one ward. After data (intervention group) were collected in March and June 2020. After data were collected in seven wards, to increase the number of pharmaconomists observed (9 instead of only 1) and thus increase generalisability. The collection of after data was performed over two periods due to COVID-19 restrictions at the hospital. A dispensing error was defined as a deviation between the prescription and the dispensed medication (eg, wrong dose). Opportunity for errors (OEs) was defined as any medication dispensed and any medication prescribed but not dispensed. Dispensing error proportion=(dispensing errors/OEs) × 100%. Results In the control group (before data), 1028 OEs were observed, covering 120 patients. In the intervention group (after data), 1036 OEs were observed, covering 122 patients. The dispensing error proportion was 2.2% (95% CI 1.4 to 3.3%) in the intervention group (23 errors) compared with 12.8% (95% CI 10.9 to 15.0) in the control group (132 errors). The difference between groups was statistically significant (p=0.00). Conclusion and relevance As pharmaconomists made fewer dispensing errors compared with nurse led medication dispensing, the results indicate high patient safety when medication is dispensed by pharmaconomists. Medication dispensing by pharmaconomists may therefore be a safe alternative to nurse led medication dispensing. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
5PSQ-193药理学家配药过程中的患者安全:前后对比研究
背景和重要性:患者安全是全球医疗保健系统的重中之重。为了确保患者的高度安全,以前的研究主要集中在不同的用药概念上(例如,自动配药,护士主导的配药或患者自我给药)。然而,资源是稀缺的,决策者希望获得最大的“物有所值”。因此,医院管理人员调查了药理学家(具有3年学位的药学技术人员(180欧洲学分转换系统积分))与护士进行药物调剂的患者安全性。目的与目的比较药理学家进行病房级药物调剂与护士主导药物调剂的患者安全性。材料和方法2020年1月,在7个医院病房实施药理学员配药。该研究被设计为前后研究。通过对实施药理学家主导药品调剂前后医务室护士和药理学家的变相观察,收集病房级调剂差错比例。之前的数据(对照组)来自同一家医院的博士研究(主要作者)。这些数据是在2017-2018年通过观察一个病房的37名护士收集的。于2020年3月和6月收集数据(干预组)。在收集了7个病区的数据后,增加了观察的药理学家的数量(9个而不是只有1个),从而增加了普遍性。由于医院对COVID-19的限制,后续数据的收集分两个时间段进行。配药错误被定义为处方与配药之间的偏差(例如,剂量错误)。错误机会(OEs)定义为任何已配发的药物和任何处方但未配发的药物。点胶误差比例=(点胶误差/OEs) × 100%。结果对照组(资料前)共观察到OEs 1028例,120例。干预组(资料后)共观察到o36例,122例患者。干预组的分配错误比例为2.2% (95% CI 1.4 ~ 3.3%)(23个错误),对照组为12.8% (95% CI 10.9 ~ 15.0)(132个错误)。组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.00)。结论及相关性与护士主导的药物调剂相比,药理学家调剂失误较少,说明药理学家调剂具有较高的患者安全性。因此,由药理学家配药可能是护士主导的药物配药的安全替代方案。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书