Interprofessional education – structural and didactical challenges / Interprofessionelles Lehren, Lernen und Handeln – Strukturelle und didaktische Herausforderungen

M. Handgraaf, S. Dieterich, C. Grüneberg
{"title":"Interprofessional education – structural and didactical challenges / Interprofessionelles Lehren, Lernen und Handeln – Strukturelle und didaktische Herausforderungen","authors":"M. Handgraaf, S. Dieterich, C. Grüneberg","doi":"10.1515/ijhp-2016-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract After five years of experience in interprofessional education (IPE) in the Bachelor programs occupational therapy, midwifery, nursing, speech therapy, and physiotherapy at the University of Applied Sciences in Bochum (Germany), we have systematically evaluated and substantially revised our IPE concept in 2014/15. The structural and curricular embedding of IPE throughout the course of the five Bachelor programs requires the development and ongoing evolution of a binding concept for the interprofessional competence development. This concept needs to be based on a systematic reflection of current practice and sound scientific knowledge concerning interprofessional topics. Furthermore, it needs to address the promotion of competencies to act inter- and transprofessionally to enable a high quality of care (Wissenschaftsrat, 2012; Walkenhorst, 2012). Results of narrative literature reviews, structured internal discussions, interviews of experts and various internal and external evaluations have been incorporated into a new conceptual framework for IPE. It has been shown that a revision of the structure, the temporal sequences of modules and the framework to facilitate interprofessional practice are essential steps for continuous development of interprofessional education. In addition, barriers and challenges are identified and discussed. Overall, the process of development has been coordinated and accompanied continuously and successfully by an IPE committee involving different groups of representative members from the Department of Applied Health Sciences.","PeriodicalId":91706,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health professions","volume":"26 1","pages":"47 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health professions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijhp-2016-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract After five years of experience in interprofessional education (IPE) in the Bachelor programs occupational therapy, midwifery, nursing, speech therapy, and physiotherapy at the University of Applied Sciences in Bochum (Germany), we have systematically evaluated and substantially revised our IPE concept in 2014/15. The structural and curricular embedding of IPE throughout the course of the five Bachelor programs requires the development and ongoing evolution of a binding concept for the interprofessional competence development. This concept needs to be based on a systematic reflection of current practice and sound scientific knowledge concerning interprofessional topics. Furthermore, it needs to address the promotion of competencies to act inter- and transprofessionally to enable a high quality of care (Wissenschaftsrat, 2012; Walkenhorst, 2012). Results of narrative literature reviews, structured internal discussions, interviews of experts and various internal and external evaluations have been incorporated into a new conceptual framework for IPE. It has been shown that a revision of the structure, the temporal sequences of modules and the framework to facilitate interprofessional practice are essential steps for continuous development of interprofessional education. In addition, barriers and challenges are identified and discussed. Overall, the process of development has been coordinated and accompanied continuously and successfully by an IPE committee involving different groups of representative members from the Department of Applied Health Sciences.
跨专业教育、结构和教学挑战/跨专业教学、学习和动作—结构和教学的挑战
在德国波鸿应用科学大学(University of Applied Sciences in Bochum)的职业治疗、助产学、护理学、语言治疗和物理治疗学士学位课程中,经过五年的跨专业教育(IPE)经验,我们在2014/15学年系统地评估并大幅修订了我们的IPE概念。国际政治经济学的结构和课程嵌入贯穿于五个学士学位课程的过程中,需要发展和不断发展具有约束力的跨专业能力发展概念。这一概念需要基于对当前实践的系统反思和有关跨专业主题的可靠科学知识。此外,它需要解决促进跨专业和跨专业行动能力的问题,以实现高质量的护理(Wissenschaftsrat, 2012;Walkenhorst, 2012)。叙述性文献综述的结果、结构化的内部讨论、专家访谈和各种内部和外部评估已被纳入国际政治经济学的新概念框架。研究表明,调整结构、模块时间序列和框架以促进跨专业实践是跨专业教育持续发展的必要步骤。此外,还确定和讨论了障碍和挑战。总体而言,由应用健康科学系不同小组的代表成员组成的IPE委员会持续而成功地协调和陪同了发展过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信