High-accuracy estimation of magnetic field strength in the interstellar medium from dust polarization

R. Skalidis, K. Tassis
{"title":"High-accuracy estimation of magnetic field strength in the interstellar medium from dust polarization","authors":"R. Skalidis, K. Tassis","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202039779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dust polarization is a powerful tool for studying the magnetic field properties in the interstellar medium (ISM). However, it does not provide a direct measurement of its strength. Different methods havebeen developed which employ both polarization and spectroscopic data in order to infer the field strength. The most widely applied methods have been developed by Davis (1951), Chandrasekhar & Fermi (1953) (DCF), Hildebrand et al. (2009) and Houde et al.(2009) (HH09). They rely on the assumption that isotropic turbulent motions initiate the propagation of Alvfen waves. Observations,however, indicate that turbulence in the ISM is anisotropic and non-Alfvenic (compressible) modes may be important. Our goal is to develop a new method for estimating the field strength in the ISM, which includes the compressible modes and does not contradict the anisotropic properties of turbulence. We use simple energetics arguments that take into account the compressible modes to estimate the strength of the magnetic field. We derive the following equation: $B_{0}=\\sqrt{2 \\pi\\rho} \\delta v /\\sqrt{\\delta \\theta}$, where $\\rho$ is the gas density, $\\delta v$ is the rms velocity as derived from the spread of emission lines, and $\\delta \\theta$ is the dispersion of polarization angles. We produce synthetic observations from 3D MHD simulationsand we assess the accuracy of our method by comparing the true field strength with the estimates derived from our equation. We find a mean relative deviation of $17 \\%$. The accuracy of our method does not depend on the turbulence properties of the simulated model. In contrast DCF and HH09 systematically overestimate the field strength. HH09 produces accurate results only for simulations with high sonic Mach numbers.","PeriodicalId":8452,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Astrophysics of Galaxies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Astrophysics of Galaxies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Dust polarization is a powerful tool for studying the magnetic field properties in the interstellar medium (ISM). However, it does not provide a direct measurement of its strength. Different methods havebeen developed which employ both polarization and spectroscopic data in order to infer the field strength. The most widely applied methods have been developed by Davis (1951), Chandrasekhar & Fermi (1953) (DCF), Hildebrand et al. (2009) and Houde et al.(2009) (HH09). They rely on the assumption that isotropic turbulent motions initiate the propagation of Alvfen waves. Observations,however, indicate that turbulence in the ISM is anisotropic and non-Alfvenic (compressible) modes may be important. Our goal is to develop a new method for estimating the field strength in the ISM, which includes the compressible modes and does not contradict the anisotropic properties of turbulence. We use simple energetics arguments that take into account the compressible modes to estimate the strength of the magnetic field. We derive the following equation: $B_{0}=\sqrt{2 \pi\rho} \delta v /\sqrt{\delta \theta}$, where $\rho$ is the gas density, $\delta v$ is the rms velocity as derived from the spread of emission lines, and $\delta \theta$ is the dispersion of polarization angles. We produce synthetic observations from 3D MHD simulationsand we assess the accuracy of our method by comparing the true field strength with the estimates derived from our equation. We find a mean relative deviation of $17 \%$. The accuracy of our method does not depend on the turbulence properties of the simulated model. In contrast DCF and HH09 systematically overestimate the field strength. HH09 produces accurate results only for simulations with high sonic Mach numbers.
基于尘埃极化的星际介质磁场强度的高精度估计
尘埃极化是研究星际介质(ISM)磁场特性的有力工具。然而,它并没有提供对其强度的直接测量。利用偏振和光谱数据来推断场强的不同方法已经被开发出来。应用最广泛的方法是Davis(1951)、Chandrasekhar & Fermi (1953) (DCF)、Hildebrand等人(2009)和Houde等人(2009)(HH09)。他们依赖于各向同性湍流运动引发阿尔芬波传播的假设。然而,观测表明,ISM中的湍流是各向异性的,非阿尔芬(可压缩)模式可能是重要的。我们的目标是开发一种新的方法来估计ISM中的场强,该方法包括可压缩模态,并且不与湍流的各向异性相矛盾。我们使用考虑可压缩模态的简单能量学参数来估计磁场的强度。我们推导出如下方程:$B_{0}=\sqrt{2 \pi\rho} \delta v /\sqrt{\delta \theta}$,其中$\rho$是气体密度,$\delta v$是由发射线扩散得到的均方根速度,$\delta \theta$是极化角的色散。我们从三维MHD模拟中产生合成观测,并通过比较真实场强与从我们的方程中得出的估计来评估我们方法的准确性。我们发现平均相对偏差为$17 \%$。我们的方法的准确性不依赖于模拟模型的湍流特性。相反,DCF和HH09系统地高估了场强。HH09只对高音速马赫数的模拟产生准确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信