Modeling Production of Longline Yarding Operations in Coastal British Columbia

Q3 Engineering
J. Mcneel
{"title":"Modeling Production of Longline Yarding Operations in Coastal British Columbia","authors":"J. Mcneel","doi":"10.1080/08435243.2000.10702742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two Madil 046 skyline yarders, rigged as slackline systems and equipped with Ballenger motorized carriages, were studied by field crews from the University of British Columbia - Forest Operations Group for approximately six months at sites on the west coast of Vancouver Island in British Columbia. A continuous turn element time study, using handheld data recorders was employed to collect data throughout the study. Mean cycle times for the two operations ranged from 11.5 to 13.5 minutes per cycle. Delays contributed at least 20 percent of the cycle time for both operations and were primarily caused by carriage related problems. Average piece size differed by more than 56 percent and created significant differences in overall system productivity. While average cycle time for the two systems differed by at least two minutes, the system with the longer cycle time had higher mean production due to the larger volume per piece and per cycle. The study results strongly suggest that maximizing volume per cycle is critical to maintaining productivity and minimizing costs, even though cycle time may be increased. In this case, one system was able to capitalize on larger average piece size to significantly improve hourly production, even though cycle times for this yarder were higher. More effort is needed during operations to monitor volume (or weight) per cycle and consistently maintain the maximum volume per cycle for existing conditions.","PeriodicalId":36173,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Forest Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"29 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Forest Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08435243.2000.10702742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Two Madil 046 skyline yarders, rigged as slackline systems and equipped with Ballenger motorized carriages, were studied by field crews from the University of British Columbia - Forest Operations Group for approximately six months at sites on the west coast of Vancouver Island in British Columbia. A continuous turn element time study, using handheld data recorders was employed to collect data throughout the study. Mean cycle times for the two operations ranged from 11.5 to 13.5 minutes per cycle. Delays contributed at least 20 percent of the cycle time for both operations and were primarily caused by carriage related problems. Average piece size differed by more than 56 percent and created significant differences in overall system productivity. While average cycle time for the two systems differed by at least two minutes, the system with the longer cycle time had higher mean production due to the larger volume per piece and per cycle. The study results strongly suggest that maximizing volume per cycle is critical to maintaining productivity and minimizing costs, even though cycle time may be increased. In this case, one system was able to capitalize on larger average piece size to significantly improve hourly production, even though cycle times for this yarder were higher. More effort is needed during operations to monitor volume (or weight) per cycle and consistently maintain the maximum volume per cycle for existing conditions.
不列颠哥伦比亚省沿海延绳钓船厂作业的建模生产
英属哥伦比亚大学森林作业组的野外工作人员在不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华岛西海岸对两台Madil 046天线桁船进行了大约6个月的研究,这些桁船安装了松弛绳系统,并配备了Ballenger机动车厢。连续转动单元时间研究,使用手持式数据记录仪在整个研究过程中收集数据。两种手术的平均周期时间为每个周期11.5至13.5分钟。延误至少占了两次运营周期时间的20%,主要是由运输相关问题引起的。平均工件尺寸差异超过56%,并且在整个系统生产率方面产生了显著差异。虽然两种系统的平均循环时间相差至少两分钟,但由于每件和每个周期的体积更大,循环时间较长的系统的平均产量更高。研究结果强烈表明,即使周期时间可能会增加,但每个周期最大限度地提高产量对于保持生产力和降低成本至关重要。在这种情况下,一个系统能够利用更大的平均件尺寸来显着提高每小时的生产,即使这个码的周期时间更高。在作业过程中,需要付出更多的努力来监测每个周期的体积(或重量),并在现有条件下始终保持每个周期的最大体积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Forest Engineering
European Journal of Forest Engineering Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信