Private Standards Organizations and Public Law

P. Strauss
{"title":"Private Standards Organizations and Public Law","authors":"P. Strauss","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2194210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Simplified, universal access to law is one of the important transformations worked by the digital age. With the replacement of physical by digital copies, citizens ordinarily need travel only to the nearest computer to find and read the texts that bind them. Lagging behind this development, however, has been computer access to standards developed by private standards development organizations, often under the umbrella of the American National Standards Institute, and then converted by agency actions incorporating them by reference into legal obligations. To discover what colors OSHA requires for use in workplace caution signs, one must purchase from ANSI the standard OSHA has referenced in its regulations, at the price ANSI chooses to charge for it.The regulations governing incorporation by reference as a federal matter have not been revised since 1982, and so do not address the changes the digital age has brought about in what it means for incorporated matter to be “reasonably available,” as 5 U.S.C. §552(a)(1) requires. This essay seeks to bridge that gap, suggesting a variety of approaches that might bring the use of incorporation by reference into conformity with modern rulemaking practices and respect the general proposition that documents stating citizens’ legal obligations are not subject to copyright, while at the same time both honoring clear federal statutory policy favoring the use of privately developed standards in rulemaking and respecting the needs standards organizations have to find reasonable means to support the costs of their operations. Business models created in the age of print need to change; the challenge is to find ways to permit the market in privately developed voluntary standards to thrive, without thereby permitting the monopoly pricing of access to governing law.","PeriodicalId":83315,"journal":{"name":"The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal : a student publication of the Marshall-Wythe School of Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"497-561"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal : a student publication of the Marshall-Wythe School of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2194210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Simplified, universal access to law is one of the important transformations worked by the digital age. With the replacement of physical by digital copies, citizens ordinarily need travel only to the nearest computer to find and read the texts that bind them. Lagging behind this development, however, has been computer access to standards developed by private standards development organizations, often under the umbrella of the American National Standards Institute, and then converted by agency actions incorporating them by reference into legal obligations. To discover what colors OSHA requires for use in workplace caution signs, one must purchase from ANSI the standard OSHA has referenced in its regulations, at the price ANSI chooses to charge for it.The regulations governing incorporation by reference as a federal matter have not been revised since 1982, and so do not address the changes the digital age has brought about in what it means for incorporated matter to be “reasonably available,” as 5 U.S.C. §552(a)(1) requires. This essay seeks to bridge that gap, suggesting a variety of approaches that might bring the use of incorporation by reference into conformity with modern rulemaking practices and respect the general proposition that documents stating citizens’ legal obligations are not subject to copyright, while at the same time both honoring clear federal statutory policy favoring the use of privately developed standards in rulemaking and respecting the needs standards organizations have to find reasonable means to support the costs of their operations. Business models created in the age of print need to change; the challenge is to find ways to permit the market in privately developed voluntary standards to thrive, without thereby permitting the monopoly pricing of access to governing law.
私人标准组织和公法
简化、普遍的法律获取是数字时代的重要变革之一。随着纸质书被数字书所取代,市民通常只需要到最近的电脑前查找和阅读与他们有关的文本。然而,落后于这一发展的是计算机对私人标准开发组织开发的标准的访问,这些组织通常在美国国家标准协会的保护伞下,然后通过代理行动将它们通过引用合并到法律义务中。要了解OSHA要求在工作场所使用的警告标志的颜色,必须以ANSI选择的价格从ANSI购买OSHA在其法规中引用的标准。自1982年以来,将公司注册作为联邦事项管理的法规未进行修订,因此没有解决数字时代对公司注册事项“合理可用”的含义所带来的变化,如5 U.S.C.§552(a)(1)所要求的那样。本文试图弥合这一差距,提出了各种方法,这些方法可能使参考合并的使用符合现代规则制定实践,并尊重说明公民法律义务的文件不受版权约束的一般主张。与此同时,在遵守明确的联邦法律政策,支持在规则制定中使用私人开发的标准和尊重需求的同时,标准组织必须找到合理的手段来支持其运营成本。在印刷时代创造的商业模式需要改变;我们面临的挑战是找到办法,允许以私人自愿标准开发的市场蓬勃发展,而不因此允许垄断定价进入管辖法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信