Lack of Clinical Leadership Competency in Continuing Education

Q4 Social Sciences
S. A. Hozni, Mohammd Hakkak
{"title":"Lack of Clinical Leadership Competency in Continuing Education","authors":"S. A. Hozni, Mohammd Hakkak","doi":"10.5812/sdme.90987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, The landscape of medical knowledge is changing constantly. On average, 50% of medical knowledge becomes obsolete in every four to five years (75% in every eight to ten years). Continuing education is considered a general principle in the healthcare system. This concept has been recognized globally since 1974. In Iran, it was first integrated experimentally in 1990 and officially approved in 1996 (1). The role of physicians in the health system is very important. Physicians are the main decision-makers in the health system, and their knowledge and attitude determine what services, in what form and at what expense, should be delivered to patients. The 2012 General Medical Council guidelines on health leadership and management particularly describe the physician’s responsibility to be more than merely “a good specialist”. The notion of “five-star doctor”, which involves a combination of clinical skills and behavioral and managerial abilities, has been described in the clinical management literature (2). In examining the effectiveness and challenges of continuing education, numerous structural and executive problems have been described, such as non-updated training, dysfunctional training, disease-oriented education rather than patient-centered education, and failure to perform educational needs assessment. However, recently, changes have occurred in continuing education, and educational plans have improved significantly due to changes, such as integration of online tutorials, increase in audience access, flexibility of different learning styles, and use of multimedia tools, which have created different scenarios in the context of continuing education. On the other hand, an important and neglected problem in the context of educational programs, which requires serious review, is the lack of managerial training and clinical leadership competencies in physicians. Although the philosophy of continuing education is to promote physicians’ professional skills, including clinical, managerial, social, and ethical skills, But it is very onesided in practice and deals only with the clinical specialty (3). A question that arises is when to use continuing education to promote qualified clinical leaders. In multiple studies, most medical students and physicians stated that management skills cannot be attained over time based on experience; on the other hand, they emphasized on the importance of training. In the medical training curriculum of Iran, no educational content has been designed for management competency training. Considering the nature of continuing education, lack of well-trained physicians and managerial issues are common after graduation (4). Generally, continuing education should be result-driven rather than process-oriented. Some researchers believe that the challenge of management is the most fundamental challenge of the 21st century. This issue is becoming more and more important in healthcare organizations because of the great importance of public health in the community. Drucker believes that “if you educate managers, everything will be right” and that “leaders are made and not born”, as consensually agreed upon in the management world. Based on this concept, competency-based training was developed. Design of competency-based training programs includes three basic steps: (1) design of a competency model; (2) identification of educational needs; and (3) implementation of management development plans (5). Competence development involves a cluster of knowledge, skills, abilities, and behaviors required for career success .Continuing. Training in systematic vision, clinical integration, and performance improvement have essential weaknesses. Continuing education programs can be successful only if they engage doctors via strategic planning and landscape design of hospitals. Therefore, it is necessary to","PeriodicalId":34340,"journal":{"name":"Strides in Development of Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strides in Development of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.90987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dear Editor, The landscape of medical knowledge is changing constantly. On average, 50% of medical knowledge becomes obsolete in every four to five years (75% in every eight to ten years). Continuing education is considered a general principle in the healthcare system. This concept has been recognized globally since 1974. In Iran, it was first integrated experimentally in 1990 and officially approved in 1996 (1). The role of physicians in the health system is very important. Physicians are the main decision-makers in the health system, and their knowledge and attitude determine what services, in what form and at what expense, should be delivered to patients. The 2012 General Medical Council guidelines on health leadership and management particularly describe the physician’s responsibility to be more than merely “a good specialist”. The notion of “five-star doctor”, which involves a combination of clinical skills and behavioral and managerial abilities, has been described in the clinical management literature (2). In examining the effectiveness and challenges of continuing education, numerous structural and executive problems have been described, such as non-updated training, dysfunctional training, disease-oriented education rather than patient-centered education, and failure to perform educational needs assessment. However, recently, changes have occurred in continuing education, and educational plans have improved significantly due to changes, such as integration of online tutorials, increase in audience access, flexibility of different learning styles, and use of multimedia tools, which have created different scenarios in the context of continuing education. On the other hand, an important and neglected problem in the context of educational programs, which requires serious review, is the lack of managerial training and clinical leadership competencies in physicians. Although the philosophy of continuing education is to promote physicians’ professional skills, including clinical, managerial, social, and ethical skills, But it is very onesided in practice and deals only with the clinical specialty (3). A question that arises is when to use continuing education to promote qualified clinical leaders. In multiple studies, most medical students and physicians stated that management skills cannot be attained over time based on experience; on the other hand, they emphasized on the importance of training. In the medical training curriculum of Iran, no educational content has been designed for management competency training. Considering the nature of continuing education, lack of well-trained physicians and managerial issues are common after graduation (4). Generally, continuing education should be result-driven rather than process-oriented. Some researchers believe that the challenge of management is the most fundamental challenge of the 21st century. This issue is becoming more and more important in healthcare organizations because of the great importance of public health in the community. Drucker believes that “if you educate managers, everything will be right” and that “leaders are made and not born”, as consensually agreed upon in the management world. Based on this concept, competency-based training was developed. Design of competency-based training programs includes three basic steps: (1) design of a competency model; (2) identification of educational needs; and (3) implementation of management development plans (5). Competence development involves a cluster of knowledge, skills, abilities, and behaviors required for career success .Continuing. Training in systematic vision, clinical integration, and performance improvement have essential weaknesses. Continuing education programs can be successful only if they engage doctors via strategic planning and landscape design of hospitals. Therefore, it is necessary to
在继续教育中缺乏临床领导能力
亲爱的编辑,医学知识的景观是不断变化的。平均每4至5年就有50%的医学知识过时(每8至10年就有75%)。继续教育被认为是医疗保健系统的一般原则。自1974年以来,这一概念已在全球得到认可。在伊朗,它于1990年首次实验性地整合,并于1996年正式批准(1)。医生在卫生系统中的作用非常重要。医生是卫生系统的主要决策者,他们的知识和态度决定了应该以何种形式、以何种费用向患者提供何种服务。2012年总医学委员会关于健康领导和管理的指导方针特别描述了医生的责任不仅仅是“一名优秀的专家”。临床管理文献(2)描述了“五星级医生”的概念,它涉及临床技能与行为和管理能力的结合。在检查继续教育的有效性和挑战时,描述了许多结构性和执行性问题,例如不更新的培训,功能失调的培训,以疾病为导向的教育而不是以患者为中心的教育,以及未能进行教育需求评估。然而,最近,继续教育发生了变化,教育计划也因变化而得到了显著改善,例如在线教程的整合、受众访问的增加、不同学习方式的灵活性以及多媒体工具的使用,这些变化创造了继续教育背景下的不同场景。另一方面,在教育项目的背景下,一个重要而被忽视的问题是医生缺乏管理培训和临床领导能力,这需要认真审查。尽管继续教育的理念是提高医生的专业技能,包括临床、管理、社会和道德技能,但在实践中它是非常片面的,只涉及临床专业(3)。出现的一个问题是,何时使用继续教育来培养合格的临床领导者。在多项研究中,大多数医科学生和医生表示,管理技能不能根据经验随着时间的推移而获得;另一方面,他们强调培训的重要性。在伊朗的医学培训课程中,没有为管理能力培训设计教育内容。考虑到继续教育的性质,毕业后缺乏训练有素的医生和管理问题是常见的(4)。一般来说,继续教育应该是结果驱动的,而不是过程导向的。一些研究者认为,管理的挑战是21世纪最根本的挑战。由于公共卫生在社区中的重要性,这个问题在医疗保健组织中变得越来越重要。德鲁克认为,“如果你对管理者进行教育,一切都会变好”,而且“领导者是后天培养出来的,而不是天生的”,这是管理界的共识。基于这一概念,以能力为基础的培训得以发展。胜任力培训方案的设计包括三个基本步骤:(1)胜任力模型的设计;(2)教育需求识别;(3)管理发展计划的实施(5)能力发展涉及职业成功所需的一系列知识、技能、能力和行为。在系统视觉、临床整合和绩效改进方面的培训有本质上的弱点。只有通过医院的战略规划和景观设计让医生参与进来,继续教育项目才能取得成功。因此,有必要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信