ESCALA DE COHESIÓN SOCIAL A NIVEL DE MUNICIPIOS EN CHILE: ANÁLISIS PSICOMÉTRICO

Jessica Candia Cid, Y. Quijada, Guillermo Sanhueza, C. Bustos
{"title":"ESCALA DE COHESIÓN SOCIAL A NIVEL DE MUNICIPIOS EN CHILE: ANÁLISIS PSICOMÉTRICO","authors":"Jessica Candia Cid, Y. Quijada, Guillermo Sanhueza, C. Bustos","doi":"10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2022v18n1/candia","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Social cohesion concept and its association with others social phenomena have received a renewed interest from academic view also public politics, however, the measurement of social cohesion concept is complex. Our objective was to evaluate psychometric proprieties of a scale to measure social cohesion at municipality level in Chile. Method: Validity, reliability and dimensionality were analyzed. The analysis had two steps: first, we applied an exploratory factor analysis (efa) with 310 participants; second, we conducted a confirmatory factor analysis (afc) with 784 participants. Participants came from different municipalities of region of Bío-Bío in Chile. Results: The efa showed a poor fit to the theoretical dimensions, detecting second order factors and independent factors. fca found six final factors, two of them were second order level: «Sense of responsibility and collaboration towards the neighborhood/municipality» (ω = 0.92); «Sense of reciprocity of support and trust with close people» (ω = 0.90). The other four independent factors were: «Support received by social organizations» (ω = 0.87); «Trust in work of the authorities» (ω = 0.73), «Experiences of discrimination» (ω = 0.83), «Sense of Tolerance» (ω = 0.92). Discussion: the results confirm the multidimensionality of social cohesion concept. This instrument works as an inventory of scales that account for this construct and it is useful to analyses from a non-normative perspective of social cohesion. Recibido 17 de septiembre de 2020 y aceptado 20 de noviembre de 2021","PeriodicalId":85291,"journal":{"name":"Polis (Bologna, Italy)","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polis (Bologna, Italy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2022v18n1/candia","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social cohesion concept and its association with others social phenomena have received a renewed interest from academic view also public politics, however, the measurement of social cohesion concept is complex. Our objective was to evaluate psychometric proprieties of a scale to measure social cohesion at municipality level in Chile. Method: Validity, reliability and dimensionality were analyzed. The analysis had two steps: first, we applied an exploratory factor analysis (efa) with 310 participants; second, we conducted a confirmatory factor analysis (afc) with 784 participants. Participants came from different municipalities of region of Bío-Bío in Chile. Results: The efa showed a poor fit to the theoretical dimensions, detecting second order factors and independent factors. fca found six final factors, two of them were second order level: «Sense of responsibility and collaboration towards the neighborhood/municipality» (ω = 0.92); «Sense of reciprocity of support and trust with close people» (ω = 0.90). The other four independent factors were: «Support received by social organizations» (ω = 0.87); «Trust in work of the authorities» (ω = 0.73), «Experiences of discrimination» (ω = 0.83), «Sense of Tolerance» (ω = 0.92). Discussion: the results confirm the multidimensionality of social cohesion concept. This instrument works as an inventory of scales that account for this construct and it is useful to analyses from a non-normative perspective of social cohesion. Recibido 17 de septiembre de 2020 y aceptado 20 de noviembre de 2021
智利市级社会凝聚力量表:心理测量分析
背景:社会凝聚力概念及其与其他社会现象的关联受到了学术界和公共政治学的重新关注,然而,社会凝聚力概念的测量是复杂的。我们的目标是评估智利市政当局衡量社会凝聚力的尺度的心理测量特性。方法:对量表进行效度、信度和维度分析。分析分为两步:首先,我们对310名参与者进行了探索性因素分析(efa);其次,我们对784名参与者进行了验证性因子分析(afc)。与会者来自智利Bío-Bío地区的不同城市。结果:efa对理论维度的拟合较差,检测出二阶因素和独立因素。fca发现了六个最终因素,其中两个是二级因素:“对社区/市政当局的责任感和协作感”(ω = 0.92);“与亲密的人相互支持和信任的互惠感”(ω = 0.90)。其他四个独立因素是:“社会组织获得的支持”(ω = 0.87);“对当局工作的信任”(ω = 0.73),“歧视经历”(ω = 0.83),“宽容意识”(ω = 0.92)。讨论:结果证实了社会凝聚力概念的多维性。这个工具作为一份解释这种结构的量表清单,它对从非规范的角度分析社会凝聚力很有用。2020年9月17日竣工,2021年11月20日竣工
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信