The Interpretive Compass Part 2: Theories of Equality and Non-Discrimination

Kay Wilson
{"title":"The Interpretive Compass Part 2: Theories of Equality and Non-Discrimination","authors":"Kay Wilson","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192843258.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 6 explains the second limb of the interpretive compass—equality and non-discrimination. The concepts of equality and discrimination are highly complex and contested in law, politics, and philosophy. This Chapter argues that the text of the CRPD is based on a wide-ranging, eclectic, and under-developed conception of equality and discrimination which is prone to inherent tensions, especially in relation to the proposed abolition of mental health law. That is, it notes conflict between formal equality in abolishing mental health law to treat everyone the same and achieving substantive equality which is sufficiently sensitive to difference, as well as conflict between direct and indirect discrimination. I describe all of the different types of equality and non-discrimination which underpin the model of equality and non-discrimination in the CRPD. I argue in accordance with my overarching contention that a meaning of equality and non-discrimination which is consistent with the overall purpose of the CRPD to ensure the enjoyment of all of the rights of persons with mental impairments is to be preferred. That is, in accordance with international human law, all rights are seen as ‘universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated’. I propose a holistic vision of equality in which persons with disabilities are able to live a meaningful life with housing, education, employment, family, and leisure taking into account their impairments and where realization of one right should not be at the cost of sacrificing others.","PeriodicalId":81815,"journal":{"name":"Law and mental health","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192843258.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 6 explains the second limb of the interpretive compass—equality and non-discrimination. The concepts of equality and discrimination are highly complex and contested in law, politics, and philosophy. This Chapter argues that the text of the CRPD is based on a wide-ranging, eclectic, and under-developed conception of equality and discrimination which is prone to inherent tensions, especially in relation to the proposed abolition of mental health law. That is, it notes conflict between formal equality in abolishing mental health law to treat everyone the same and achieving substantive equality which is sufficiently sensitive to difference, as well as conflict between direct and indirect discrimination. I describe all of the different types of equality and non-discrimination which underpin the model of equality and non-discrimination in the CRPD. I argue in accordance with my overarching contention that a meaning of equality and non-discrimination which is consistent with the overall purpose of the CRPD to ensure the enjoyment of all of the rights of persons with mental impairments is to be preferred. That is, in accordance with international human law, all rights are seen as ‘universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated’. I propose a holistic vision of equality in which persons with disabilities are able to live a meaningful life with housing, education, employment, family, and leisure taking into account their impairments and where realization of one right should not be at the cost of sacrificing others.
解释性指南针第2部分:平等和非歧视理论
第六章解释了解释性指南针的第二个分支——平等和非歧视。平等和歧视的概念在法律、政治和哲学上都是非常复杂和有争议的。本章认为,《残疾人权利公约》的案文基于一种广泛、折衷和不发达的平等和歧视概念,这种概念容易产生内在的紧张关系,特别是在拟议废除精神卫生法方面。也就是说,它注意到废除精神卫生法以平等对待所有人与实现对差异足够敏感的实质性平等之间的正式平等之间的冲突,以及直接歧视和间接歧视之间的冲突。我描述了所有不同类型的平等和不歧视,它们是《残疾人权利公约》中平等和不歧视模式的基础。根据我的首要论点,我认为平等和不歧视的含义应符合《残疾人权利公约》的总体目的,即确保精神障碍者享有所有权利。也就是说,根据国际人权法,所有权利都被视为“普遍、不可分割、相互依存和相互关联”。我提出了一种全面的平等观,在这种平等观中,考虑到残疾人的缺陷,残疾人能够在住房、教育、就业、家庭和休闲方面过上有意义的生活,实现一项权利不应以牺牲其他权利为代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书