Teaching, learning and assessment of professionalism in medical education: A citation-based systematic review of literature

Firdous Jahan, Nisar Ahmad, Ikram A Burney
{"title":"Teaching, learning and assessment of professionalism in medical education: A citation-based systematic review of literature","authors":"Firdous Jahan, Nisar Ahmad, Ikram A Burney","doi":"10.53771/ijlsra.2023.4.1.0155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Professionalism is an important competence in medical practice, yet a complex area. We describe the landscape of published articles on teaching, learning and assessment of professionalism in medical schools. This study aims to review the temporal trend of literature published and cited on the subject, and includes frequently publishing authors, journals, and network analysis. The study further aims to present the themes of the most commonly cited articles. Methods: A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was carried out to describe the current patterns of research in professionalism using the terms “professionalism” AND \"medical education\" OR \"medical college\" OR \"medical school\". The title and abstract of the selected documents were skimmed to include only relevant articles. ‘Relevant’ articles were defined as articles describing teaching, learning or assessment of professionalism in undergraduate medical curricula. Articles describing professionalism, but not directly related to teaching, learning and assessment were excluded. Results: Over the study period spanning from 1973 to 2020, a total of 1053 articles were identified as relevant. A surge in the number of publications was observed from the year 2000. Over 400 articles were published in 5 leading journals in medical education. Of the 50 top-cited papers, 18 (36%) articles explored opinions of stake holders through questionnaires and surveys about different aspects of professionalism, there were 13 (26%) ‘Commentary’ and 7 (14%) review articles. The primary objectives of more than 50% of the top-cited articles were assessment methods (14%), teaching by humiliation (14%), personal identity formation (8%), barriers to professionalism (8%), and teaching ethics (8%) and empathy (8%). Conclusions: We describe the landscape of published articles on teaching, learning and assessment of professionalism in undergraduate medical schools. The surge in publications since 2000, top publishing journals and frequently publishing authors were identified. Of the most cited articles, assessment methods, personal identity formation, and teaching empathy and ethics predominate as the main themes.","PeriodicalId":14144,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Life Science Research Archive","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Life Science Research Archive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53771/ijlsra.2023.4.1.0155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Professionalism is an important competence in medical practice, yet a complex area. We describe the landscape of published articles on teaching, learning and assessment of professionalism in medical schools. This study aims to review the temporal trend of literature published and cited on the subject, and includes frequently publishing authors, journals, and network analysis. The study further aims to present the themes of the most commonly cited articles. Methods: A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was carried out to describe the current patterns of research in professionalism using the terms “professionalism” AND "medical education" OR "medical college" OR "medical school". The title and abstract of the selected documents were skimmed to include only relevant articles. ‘Relevant’ articles were defined as articles describing teaching, learning or assessment of professionalism in undergraduate medical curricula. Articles describing professionalism, but not directly related to teaching, learning and assessment were excluded. Results: Over the study period spanning from 1973 to 2020, a total of 1053 articles were identified as relevant. A surge in the number of publications was observed from the year 2000. Over 400 articles were published in 5 leading journals in medical education. Of the 50 top-cited papers, 18 (36%) articles explored opinions of stake holders through questionnaires and surveys about different aspects of professionalism, there were 13 (26%) ‘Commentary’ and 7 (14%) review articles. The primary objectives of more than 50% of the top-cited articles were assessment methods (14%), teaching by humiliation (14%), personal identity formation (8%), barriers to professionalism (8%), and teaching ethics (8%) and empathy (8%). Conclusions: We describe the landscape of published articles on teaching, learning and assessment of professionalism in undergraduate medical schools. The surge in publications since 2000, top publishing journals and frequently publishing authors were identified. Of the most cited articles, assessment methods, personal identity formation, and teaching empathy and ethics predominate as the main themes.
医学教育中专业精神的教、学与评估:基于引文的文献系统回顾
背景:专业精神是医疗实践中一项重要的能力,也是一个复杂的领域。我们描述了在医学院校的教学,学习和专业评估发表文章的景观。本研究旨在回顾这一主题发表和被引文献的时间趋势,包括频繁发表的作者、期刊和网络分析。该研究进一步旨在呈现最常被引用的文章的主题。方法:对同行评议文献进行系统回顾,以“专业主义”和“医学教育”、“医学院”或“医学院”等术语来描述目前专业主义研究的模式。所选文件的标题和摘要略读,只包括相关的文章。“相关”文章定义为描述本科医学课程中教学、学习或专业评估的文章。描述专业性但与教学、学习和评估没有直接关系的文章被排除在外。结果:在1973年至2020年的研究期间,共有1053篇文章被确定为相关。自2000年以来,出版物数量激增。在医学教育的5个主要期刊上发表了400多篇文章。在50篇被引最多的论文中,18篇(36%)文章通过问卷调查和对专业不同方面的调查来探讨利益相关者的意见,13篇(26%)“评论”和7篇(14%)评论文章。超过50%的高被引文章的主要目标是评估方法(14%)、羞辱教学(14%)、个人身份形成(8%)、专业障碍(8%)、教学道德(8%)和同理心(8%)。结论:我们描述了在本科医学院的教学,学习和专业评估发表文章的景观。自2000年以来,出版物激增,顶级出版期刊和频繁出版的作者被确定。在被引用最多的文章中,评估方法、个人身份的形成、教学同理心和伦理是主要的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信