{"title":"‘Turning her Over in the Flat of my Dreams’: Visuality, Cut-up and Irreality in the Work of Ann Quin","authors":"H. White","doi":"10.1080/09574042.2022.2020013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Drawing together dreaming and cut-up in Ann Quin’s work, this article considers the textual juxtapositions of the story, ‘Tripticks’ (1968), the latterly developed novel, Tripticks (1972), and Quin’s explicit incorporation of two ‘cut-up dreams’ into the narrative of Passages (1969). In placing cut-up segments together, a relationship—and a narrative—emerges, although not necessarily a plot-centric one, for ‘[p]lot can diminish in a forest of effects and accidents’ (Quin 1968, ‘Tripticks’: 14). Examining Quin’s development of ‘causeless’ narrative, with recourse to both psychoanalytic and countercultural accounts of the dream, I contend that Quin uses the motif and aesthetics of the dream to explore issues of agency, and dislocation between subject and environment. While W.S. Burroughs stakes his interest in the dream as a basis for (visual) literary invention in The Third Mind in 1967, claiming to be directing his attention ‘outward’, Freud suggests in 1899 that we ‘build our way out into the dark’ in the interpretation of dreams (550). The cut-up functions by the same logic, capitalizing on unpredictability, on not knowing what will come next. While Quin’s cut-ups produce comedy through surprising juxtapositions, their fracturing of temporal and spatial relations, and elimination of causality, result in a somewhat nightmarish ‘reality’ for her depicted subjects, emphasizing entrapment within the dream world over the liberational qualities of dream favoured by Burroughs, narrativising the tension between freedom and constraint inherent in the cut-up form.","PeriodicalId":54053,"journal":{"name":"Women-A Cultural Review","volume":"2 1","pages":"114 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women-A Cultural Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2022.2020013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Drawing together dreaming and cut-up in Ann Quin’s work, this article considers the textual juxtapositions of the story, ‘Tripticks’ (1968), the latterly developed novel, Tripticks (1972), and Quin’s explicit incorporation of two ‘cut-up dreams’ into the narrative of Passages (1969). In placing cut-up segments together, a relationship—and a narrative—emerges, although not necessarily a plot-centric one, for ‘[p]lot can diminish in a forest of effects and accidents’ (Quin 1968, ‘Tripticks’: 14). Examining Quin’s development of ‘causeless’ narrative, with recourse to both psychoanalytic and countercultural accounts of the dream, I contend that Quin uses the motif and aesthetics of the dream to explore issues of agency, and dislocation between subject and environment. While W.S. Burroughs stakes his interest in the dream as a basis for (visual) literary invention in The Third Mind in 1967, claiming to be directing his attention ‘outward’, Freud suggests in 1899 that we ‘build our way out into the dark’ in the interpretation of dreams (550). The cut-up functions by the same logic, capitalizing on unpredictability, on not knowing what will come next. While Quin’s cut-ups produce comedy through surprising juxtapositions, their fracturing of temporal and spatial relations, and elimination of causality, result in a somewhat nightmarish ‘reality’ for her depicted subjects, emphasizing entrapment within the dream world over the liberational qualities of dream favoured by Burroughs, narrativising the tension between freedom and constraint inherent in the cut-up form.
本文将安·奎因作品中的梦和切割结合在一起,考虑了故事《Tripticks》(1968)的文本并列,后来发展的小说《Tripticks》(1972),以及奎因在《段落》(1969)的叙述中明确地将两个“切割的梦”结合在一起。在将分割的片段放在一起的过程中,一种关系——以及一种叙述——出现了,尽管不一定是以情节为中心的,因为“很多东西会在影响和意外的森林中消失”(Quin 1968,“Tripticks”:14)。通过对梦的精神分析和反主流文化描述,考察奎因的“无因”叙事的发展,我认为奎因利用梦的母题和美学来探索代理问题,以及主体与环境之间的错位。1967年,W.S.巴勒斯(W.S. Burroughs)在《第三种思维》(the Third Mind)中将他对梦的兴趣作为(视觉)文学发明的基础,声称他的注意力是“向外”引导的,而弗洛伊德在1899年提出,我们在解释梦的过程中“建立了通往黑暗的道路”(550)。切割的功能是相同的逻辑,利用不可预测性,不知道接下来会发生什么。奎因的剪辑通过令人惊讶的并列产生喜剧,他们对时间和空间关系的破坏,以及对因果关系的消除,给她所描绘的对象带来了一种有点噩梦般的“现实”,强调了梦境世界的束缚,而不是巴勒斯所青睐的梦的自由品质,叙述了切割形式中固有的自由和约束之间的紧张关系。