Adenosine receptor agonists differentially affect the anticonvulsant action of carbamazepine and valproate against maximal electroshock test-induced seizures in mice

M. Jasiński, M. Chrościńska-Krawczyk, S. Czuczwar
{"title":"Adenosine receptor agonists differentially affect the anticonvulsant action of carbamazepine and valproate against maximal electroshock test-induced seizures in mice","authors":"M. Jasiński, M. Chrościńska-Krawczyk, S. Czuczwar","doi":"10.1515/JOEPI-2017-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Background Adenosine is regarded as an endogenous anticonvulsant and its agonists have been proved to affect the anticonvulsant activity of a number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in animal models of seizures. Aim To evaluate effects of adenosine agonists on carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPA) in mouse model of generalized tonic-clonic convulsions. Methods The following adenosine receptor agonists were used: A1 – cyclohexyladenosine, A2A – CGS 21 680, A3 – N6-benzyl-NECA and A1 (preferentially) and A2 – 2-chloroadenosine. Their possible anticonvulsant effects were studied in a threshold electroconvulsive test for maximal electroconvulsions. The protective activity of AEDs alone or in combinations with adenosine agonists was evaluated in the form of their respective ED50 values necessary to protect 50% of mice against tonic extension of the hind limbs, following maximal electroshock, delivered through ear electrodes. The specificity of interactions between AEDs and adenosine agonists was challenged with an adenosine receptor A1 and A2 antagonist, aminophylline (5 mg/kg). The effects of AEDs alone or with adenosine agonists were tested for the occurrence of adverse effects (AE) (impairment of motor coordination) in a chimney test. All combinations with an enhancement the protective activity of CBZ or VPA were verified with the free plasma or brain concentration of these AED. Results Adenosine receptor agonists (cycloheksyladenosine up to 4 mg/kg; CGS 21 680 – 8 mg/kg; N6-benzyl-NECA – 1 mg/kg; 2-chloroadenosine – 2 mg/kg) did not significantly affect the threshold for maximal electroconvulsions. Cycloheksyladenosine (1 mg/kg), N6-benzyl-NECA (0.5 and 1 mg/kg) and 2-chloroadenosine (1 mg/kg) potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of CBZ. Valproate’s protective action was enhanced by one adenosine agonist – cycloheksyladenosine (1 mg/kg). Only the combination of CBZ + N6-benzyl-NECA (1 mg/kg) was resistant to aminophylline (5 mg/kg). Pharmacokinetic interactions were evident in case of the combination of CBZ + N6-benzyl-NECA (1 mg/kg) and resulted in an increased free plasma concentration of this CBZ. Interestingly, total brain concentration of CBZ confirmed the pharmacokinetic interaction as regards CBZ + N6-benzyl-NECA (1 mg/kg). Conclusion The best profile was shown by the combination of CBZ + 2-chloroadenosine which involved no AE or a pharmacokinetic interaction. The remaining positive combinations in terms of anticonvulsant activity were associated with general profound AE and pharmacokinetic interactions in some of them.","PeriodicalId":15683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epileptology","volume":"196 1","pages":"21 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epileptology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/JOEPI-2017-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Background Adenosine is regarded as an endogenous anticonvulsant and its agonists have been proved to affect the anticonvulsant activity of a number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in animal models of seizures. Aim To evaluate effects of adenosine agonists on carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPA) in mouse model of generalized tonic-clonic convulsions. Methods The following adenosine receptor agonists were used: A1 – cyclohexyladenosine, A2A – CGS 21 680, A3 – N6-benzyl-NECA and A1 (preferentially) and A2 – 2-chloroadenosine. Their possible anticonvulsant effects were studied in a threshold electroconvulsive test for maximal electroconvulsions. The protective activity of AEDs alone or in combinations with adenosine agonists was evaluated in the form of their respective ED50 values necessary to protect 50% of mice against tonic extension of the hind limbs, following maximal electroshock, delivered through ear electrodes. The specificity of interactions between AEDs and adenosine agonists was challenged with an adenosine receptor A1 and A2 antagonist, aminophylline (5 mg/kg). The effects of AEDs alone or with adenosine agonists were tested for the occurrence of adverse effects (AE) (impairment of motor coordination) in a chimney test. All combinations with an enhancement the protective activity of CBZ or VPA were verified with the free plasma or brain concentration of these AED. Results Adenosine receptor agonists (cycloheksyladenosine up to 4 mg/kg; CGS 21 680 – 8 mg/kg; N6-benzyl-NECA – 1 mg/kg; 2-chloroadenosine – 2 mg/kg) did not significantly affect the threshold for maximal electroconvulsions. Cycloheksyladenosine (1 mg/kg), N6-benzyl-NECA (0.5 and 1 mg/kg) and 2-chloroadenosine (1 mg/kg) potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of CBZ. Valproate’s protective action was enhanced by one adenosine agonist – cycloheksyladenosine (1 mg/kg). Only the combination of CBZ + N6-benzyl-NECA (1 mg/kg) was resistant to aminophylline (5 mg/kg). Pharmacokinetic interactions were evident in case of the combination of CBZ + N6-benzyl-NECA (1 mg/kg) and resulted in an increased free plasma concentration of this CBZ. Interestingly, total brain concentration of CBZ confirmed the pharmacokinetic interaction as regards CBZ + N6-benzyl-NECA (1 mg/kg). Conclusion The best profile was shown by the combination of CBZ + 2-chloroadenosine which involved no AE or a pharmacokinetic interaction. The remaining positive combinations in terms of anticonvulsant activity were associated with general profound AE and pharmacokinetic interactions in some of them.
腺苷受体激动剂对卡马西平和丙戊酸对小鼠最大电击试验诱发癫痫发作的抗惊厥作用有不同的影响
背景腺苷被认为是一种内源性抗惊厥药,其激动剂已被证明能影响许多抗癫痫药物(AEDs)在癫痫发作动物模型中的抗惊厥活性。目的探讨腺苷激动剂对卡马西平(CBZ)和丙戊酸(VPA)在小鼠全身性强直-阵挛性惊厥模型中的作用。方法采用腺苷受体激动剂:A1 -环己基腺苷、A2A - CGS 21680、A3 - n6 -苄基- neca、A1(优先)和A2 - 2-氯腺苷。在最大电惊厥的阈值电惊厥试验中研究了它们可能的抗惊厥作用。aed单独使用或与腺苷激动剂联合使用的保护活性以其各自的ED50值的形式进行评估,以保护50%的小鼠免受通过耳电极传递的最大电击后后肢强直性伸展所必需的ED50值。aed与腺苷受体A1和A2拮抗剂氨茶碱(5 mg/kg)相互作用的特异性受到挑战。在烟囱试验中,检测了aed单独使用或与腺苷激动剂联合使用的不良反应(AE)(运动协调障碍)的发生情况。所有具有增强CBZ或VPA保护活性的组合都用这些AED的游离血浆或脑浓度来验证。结果腺苷受体激动剂(环heksyladenosine达4 mg/kg;CGS 21 680 - 8 mg/kg;n6 -苄基- neca - 1 mg/kg;2-氯腺苷(2mg /kg)对最大电惊厥阈值无显著影响。环六烷基腺苷(1mg /kg)、n6 -苄基- neca(0.5和1mg /kg)和2-氯腺苷(1mg /kg)增强了CBZ的抗惊厥活性。丙戊酸的保护作用被一种腺苷激动剂环己基腺苷(1mg /kg)增强。只有CBZ + n6 -苄基- neca组合(1 mg/kg)对氨茶碱(5 mg/kg)有抗性。在CBZ + n6 -苄基- neca (1mg /kg)联合使用的情况下,药代动力学相互作用很明显,并导致该CBZ的游离血浆浓度增加。有趣的是,CBZ的脑总浓度证实了CBZ + n6 -苄基- neca (1 mg/kg)的药代动力学相互作用。结论CBZ + 2-氯腺苷联合用药效果最佳,且无AE和药动学相互作用。其余抗惊厥活性阳性组合与一般深度AE和其中一些药代动力学相互作用有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信