The Effects of Tracheal Suction with N-acetylcysteine on Incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia

Nahid Mir, F. Yaghoubinia, Alireza Rahat Dahmardeh, M. Jahantigh
{"title":"The Effects of Tracheal Suction with N-acetylcysteine on Incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia","authors":"Nahid Mir, F. Yaghoubinia, Alireza Rahat Dahmardeh, M. Jahantigh","doi":"10.5812/msnj-135589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Correct endotracheal tube suction is one of the effective methods to prevent ventilator-associated infection. Many studies have reported that normal saline and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in the trachea lead the translocation of bacteria to lower levels and increase the risk of pneumonia. Objectives: The present study sought to examine the effect of tracheal suction with NAC on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods: This single-blind randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 60 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Khatam Al-Anbia Hospital in Zahedan, Iran, in 2020. The patients were selected using the convenience sampling method and assigned into two intervention and control groups by permutation block randomization. Before the intervention, the patients were evaluated using the Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (MCPIS), and the patients with scores < 5 on this scale were included in the study. Suctioning tracheal secretions in the intervention group was performed by pouring 2 cc of NAC into the tracheal tube during suction. The same suction procedure was performed for the patients in the control group by pouring 2 cc of normal saline into the tracheal tube in a standard way. The intervention was conducted for five days. After the intervention, the MCPIS scale was administered once more for the two groups. The collected data were analyzed using the independent samples t-test and chi-square test with SPSS software (version 25). Results: The independent samples t-test showed no significant difference between the intervention and control groups regarding the incidence of pneumonia (P = 0.31). Conclusions: Despite the effect of NAC on the incidence rate of pneumonia in patients under mechanical ventilation, there was no significant difference between NAC and normal saline in reducing the incidence of pneumonia. However, since NAC leads to no specific complication in patients, it can be safely used in the suction of tracheal lobule secretions in patients under ventilators. In this regard, further studies should examine the use of NAC for suctioning during tracheal tube obstruction by secretions.","PeriodicalId":18480,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/msnj-135589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Correct endotracheal tube suction is one of the effective methods to prevent ventilator-associated infection. Many studies have reported that normal saline and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in the trachea lead the translocation of bacteria to lower levels and increase the risk of pneumonia. Objectives: The present study sought to examine the effect of tracheal suction with NAC on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods: This single-blind randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 60 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Khatam Al-Anbia Hospital in Zahedan, Iran, in 2020. The patients were selected using the convenience sampling method and assigned into two intervention and control groups by permutation block randomization. Before the intervention, the patients were evaluated using the Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (MCPIS), and the patients with scores < 5 on this scale were included in the study. Suctioning tracheal secretions in the intervention group was performed by pouring 2 cc of NAC into the tracheal tube during suction. The same suction procedure was performed for the patients in the control group by pouring 2 cc of normal saline into the tracheal tube in a standard way. The intervention was conducted for five days. After the intervention, the MCPIS scale was administered once more for the two groups. The collected data were analyzed using the independent samples t-test and chi-square test with SPSS software (version 25). Results: The independent samples t-test showed no significant difference between the intervention and control groups regarding the incidence of pneumonia (P = 0.31). Conclusions: Despite the effect of NAC on the incidence rate of pneumonia in patients under mechanical ventilation, there was no significant difference between NAC and normal saline in reducing the incidence of pneumonia. However, since NAC leads to no specific complication in patients, it can be safely used in the suction of tracheal lobule secretions in patients under ventilators. In this regard, further studies should examine the use of NAC for suctioning during tracheal tube obstruction by secretions.
n -乙酰半胱氨酸气管吸入对呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率的影响
背景:正确吸气管插管是预防呼吸机相关性感染的有效方法之一。许多研究报道,气管内的生理盐水和n -乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)导致细菌易位降低,增加肺炎的风险。目的:本研究旨在探讨NAC气管吸引对呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率的影响。方法:对2020年在伊朗扎黑丹Khatam Al-Anbia医院重症监护室(ICU)住院的60例患者进行单盲随机临床试验研究。采用方便抽样法将患者随机分为干预组和对照组。干预前采用改良临床肺部感染评分(MCPIS)对患者进行评估,该评分< 5分的患者纳入研究。干预组吸入气管分泌物时向气管管中灌注NAC 2cc。对照组患者采用相同的吸痰方法,按标准方式向气管管内注入生理盐水2cc。干预进行了五天。干预后,两组再次进行MCPIS量表。采用SPSS软件(25版)对收集的数据进行独立样本t检验和卡方检验。结果:经独立样本t检验,干预组与对照组肺炎发病率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.31)。结论:尽管NAC对机械通气患者肺炎的发生率有影响,但NAC与生理盐水在降低肺炎发生率方面无显著差异。但由于NAC对患者无特异性并发症,可安全用于呼吸机下患者的气管小叶分泌物吸吸。在这方面,进一步的研究应探讨在分泌物阻塞气管时使用NAC进行吸引。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信