Evaluation of Slit-Skin Smear Against Punch Biopsy in Diagnosing Leprosy: A Cross-sectional Study in a Tertiary Care Centre of West Bengal

L. K. Marak, Sudipta Roy, Tanusree Mondal, M. Sarkar, T. Ghosh, J. Dey
{"title":"Evaluation of Slit-Skin Smear Against Punch Biopsy in Diagnosing Leprosy: A Cross-sectional Study in a Tertiary Care Centre of West Bengal","authors":"L. K. Marak, Sudipta Roy, Tanusree Mondal, M. Sarkar, T. Ghosh, J. Dey","doi":"10.34172/ajcmi.2021.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Leprosy is an infectious disease which faces diagnostic challenges. Slit-skin smear (SSS) is an age simple diagnostic technique, yet not commonly applied by health care providers. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of SSS in terms of validity, diagnostic accuracy, and percentage agreement against punch biopsy in diagnosing leprosy among leprosy patients who were diagnosed with leprosy on clinical grounds only (i.e., number of skin lesions and/or peripheral nerve thickening). Methods: An evaluation study of diagnostic tests with a cross-sectional design was conducted at a tertiary care center of Bankura. In general, 70 new untreated leprosy patients, diagnosed solely by clinical grounds (i.e., count of skin lesions and/or thickening of the nerve) and attending the dermatology outpatient department (From February 2019 to January 2020) were enrolled in this study. After excluding pure neuritic, relapse, and seriously ill patients by consecutive sampling, they were subjected to both SSS and punch biopsy using a standard process. SPSS for Windows (Version 16.0., Chicago, SPSS Inc.) was used to analyze data. Z test, chi-square test, and kappa test were conducted to test the statistical significance between the effectiveness of SSS and punch biopsy. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and diagnostic accuracy of SSS were 81.81%, 95.83%, 90%, 92%, 20%, 0.19%, 102.87%, and 91.42%, respectively. Based on the results, SSS could detect acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in clinically diagnosed leprosy cases slightly less than punch biopsy, but it was statistically insignificant (Z=0.3689, P=0.71138, df=1). Finally, Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was 0.796, representing substantial agreement between SSS and punch biopsy (95% CI: 0.641-0.951). Conclusions: Overall, SSS is more or less equally effective as compared to punch biopsy in confirming leprosy cases. Interest and training on SSS among resident doctors should be emphasized accordingly.","PeriodicalId":8689,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ajcmi.2021.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Leprosy is an infectious disease which faces diagnostic challenges. Slit-skin smear (SSS) is an age simple diagnostic technique, yet not commonly applied by health care providers. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of SSS in terms of validity, diagnostic accuracy, and percentage agreement against punch biopsy in diagnosing leprosy among leprosy patients who were diagnosed with leprosy on clinical grounds only (i.e., number of skin lesions and/or peripheral nerve thickening). Methods: An evaluation study of diagnostic tests with a cross-sectional design was conducted at a tertiary care center of Bankura. In general, 70 new untreated leprosy patients, diagnosed solely by clinical grounds (i.e., count of skin lesions and/or thickening of the nerve) and attending the dermatology outpatient department (From February 2019 to January 2020) were enrolled in this study. After excluding pure neuritic, relapse, and seriously ill patients by consecutive sampling, they were subjected to both SSS and punch biopsy using a standard process. SPSS for Windows (Version 16.0., Chicago, SPSS Inc.) was used to analyze data. Z test, chi-square test, and kappa test were conducted to test the statistical significance between the effectiveness of SSS and punch biopsy. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and diagnostic accuracy of SSS were 81.81%, 95.83%, 90%, 92%, 20%, 0.19%, 102.87%, and 91.42%, respectively. Based on the results, SSS could detect acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in clinically diagnosed leprosy cases slightly less than punch biopsy, but it was statistically insignificant (Z=0.3689, P=0.71138, df=1). Finally, Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was 0.796, representing substantial agreement between SSS and punch biopsy (95% CI: 0.641-0.951). Conclusions: Overall, SSS is more or less equally effective as compared to punch biopsy in confirming leprosy cases. Interest and training on SSS among resident doctors should be emphasized accordingly.
裂口皮肤涂片对针刺活检诊断麻风病的评价:西孟加拉邦三级保健中心的横断面研究
背景:麻风病是一种面临诊断挑战的传染病。裂隙皮肤涂片(SSS)是一种年龄简单的诊断技术,但不常用的卫生保健提供者。该研究旨在确定SSS在诊断麻风方面的有效性,诊断准确性,以及在仅根据临床诊断为麻风的麻风患者(即皮肤病变数量和/或周围神经增厚)中与穿孔活检诊断麻风的百分比一致性。方法:在班库拉一家三级保健中心进行了一项横断面设计的诊断试验评价研究。总体而言,本研究纳入了70例新的未经治疗的麻风患者,这些患者仅通过临床依据(即皮肤病变计数和/或神经增厚)进行诊断,并在皮肤科门诊就诊(2019年2月至2020年1月)。在通过连续取样排除纯神经性炎、复发和重症患者后,他们使用标准流程进行SSS和穿孔活检。SPSS for Windows (Version 16.0)使用SPSS Inc.)对数据进行分析。采用Z检验、卡方检验、kappa检验检验SSS与穿孔活检的疗效是否有统计学意义。结果:SSS的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、诊断优势比(DOR)、诊断准确率分别为81.81%、95.83%、90%、92%、20%、0.19%、102.87%、91.42%。结果显示,SSS对麻风临床诊断病例抗酸杆菌(AFB)的检出率略低于针刺活检,但差异无统计学意义(Z=0.3689, P=0.71138, df=1)。最后,Cohen’s Kappa系数为0.796,表明SSS和穿孔活检之间基本一致(95% CI: 0.641-0.951)。结论:总的来说,在麻风病的诊断中,SSS与穿刺活检或多或少是一样有效的。应重视住院医师对SSS的兴趣和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信