Cased Hole Solution with Fast Neutrons and Sonic Reflective Waves in Tight Reservoirs

U. Bustos, C. Moya, D. Rose, T. Zhou, G. Martinez
{"title":"Cased Hole Solution with Fast Neutrons and Sonic Reflective Waves in Tight Reservoirs","authors":"U. Bustos, C. Moya, D. Rose, T. Zhou, G. Martinez","doi":"10.2118/197423-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Important hydrocarbon accumulations occur in tight rocks in Colombian areas. Those tight reservoirs consist of clean sandstones with matrix porosities in the 3% to 4% range, relatively complex mineralogy and naturally fractured. The success of achieving a representative formation evaluation relies on obtaining accurate porosity, oil, gas, water saturations, natural fractures detection and good estimates on reservoir permeability. Resistivity-based approaches are difficult to apply since reservoir conductivity is not only influenced by fluid type, but also by salinity (typically low in our reservoirs), variable tortuosity (mostly high in the matrix and very low in fractures) and very high formation resistivity (above 1,000 ohms.m). In addition, a combination of low pores volumes and a matrix not properly assessed, leads to high errors in the porosity determination with conventional logs (in a 3 – 4 p.u. reservoir, the porosity error computation can be as high as 50%). Uncertainties in porosity estimates also translates to uncertainties during saturation assessment.\n Further challenges are found when attempting the saturation computation from resistivity logs. The tight sands are drilled with Oil Based Muds, creating a logging environment where only induction logs are possible. However, since the resistivity range in these rocks is above 1000 ohm.m range, the induction measurements are out of range in many of the target zones. Alternative formation evaluation methods for assessing fluids saturations, like magnetic resonance, sigma and carbon-oxygen logs cannot be applied below 10 porosity units; whereas dielectric measurements strongly depend on accurate porosity computations for deriving the hydrocarbon volume.\n Some of these reservoirs, are also deep (in the 17,000 ft range) and close to foothills, where wellbore stability issues and narrow mud weight windows used for drilling, translates into higher risks for open-hole logging via logging while drilling or wireline conveyance, all of it detrimental to data acquisition in open hole. Therefore, the case studies presented in this paper were assessed in cased hole conditions.\n In this paper, we present a solution that cover tight matrix and natural fractures assessment, at a level not previously achieved. At the tight matrix level, we carry out advanced nuclear spectroscopy with a new pulsed neutron device, that carry out simultaneous time domain and energy domain measurements. A new resistivity and salinity independent methodology for obtaining Gas saturation from a new measurement in the industry known as \"Fast Neutron Cross Section\" (FNXS), oil saturation from the total organic carbon (TOC) log, mineral volumes solved from formation elemental concentrations from energy domain, and porosity from hydrogen index obtained from the spectroscopy time domain, is presented. At natural fracture level, we make use of a Borehole Acoustic Reflection Service for deep natural fracture detection and spatial orientation analysis, done at cased hole conditions.\n The main advantages of the new method for obtaining porosity, mineralogy, salinity-independent hydrocarbon saturation in tight matrix and natural fracture assessment behind casing are: 1) conversion of dry weight total carbon to oil saturation, and fast neutron cross section to gas saturation done through a simultaneous inversion by solving matrix-porosity-fluids volumes into an elemental analysis, proven to work at low porosities rocks; 2) independency of salinity and reservoir tortuosity effects; 3) clay and/or other lithology effects is quantified and taken into account; 4) faster logging speeds and improve tools combinability in bigger holes while ensuring full reservoir assessment in small holes; 5) operational time reduction.\n The spectroscopy logging is carried out in single acquisition pass at 150 to 350-feet per hour (ft/hr), whereas sonic acquisition is done at 400 ft/hr in a single pass as well.","PeriodicalId":11061,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 11, 2019","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 11, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197423-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Important hydrocarbon accumulations occur in tight rocks in Colombian areas. Those tight reservoirs consist of clean sandstones with matrix porosities in the 3% to 4% range, relatively complex mineralogy and naturally fractured. The success of achieving a representative formation evaluation relies on obtaining accurate porosity, oil, gas, water saturations, natural fractures detection and good estimates on reservoir permeability. Resistivity-based approaches are difficult to apply since reservoir conductivity is not only influenced by fluid type, but also by salinity (typically low in our reservoirs), variable tortuosity (mostly high in the matrix and very low in fractures) and very high formation resistivity (above 1,000 ohms.m). In addition, a combination of low pores volumes and a matrix not properly assessed, leads to high errors in the porosity determination with conventional logs (in a 3 – 4 p.u. reservoir, the porosity error computation can be as high as 50%). Uncertainties in porosity estimates also translates to uncertainties during saturation assessment. Further challenges are found when attempting the saturation computation from resistivity logs. The tight sands are drilled with Oil Based Muds, creating a logging environment where only induction logs are possible. However, since the resistivity range in these rocks is above 1000 ohm.m range, the induction measurements are out of range in many of the target zones. Alternative formation evaluation methods for assessing fluids saturations, like magnetic resonance, sigma and carbon-oxygen logs cannot be applied below 10 porosity units; whereas dielectric measurements strongly depend on accurate porosity computations for deriving the hydrocarbon volume. Some of these reservoirs, are also deep (in the 17,000 ft range) and close to foothills, where wellbore stability issues and narrow mud weight windows used for drilling, translates into higher risks for open-hole logging via logging while drilling or wireline conveyance, all of it detrimental to data acquisition in open hole. Therefore, the case studies presented in this paper were assessed in cased hole conditions. In this paper, we present a solution that cover tight matrix and natural fractures assessment, at a level not previously achieved. At the tight matrix level, we carry out advanced nuclear spectroscopy with a new pulsed neutron device, that carry out simultaneous time domain and energy domain measurements. A new resistivity and salinity independent methodology for obtaining Gas saturation from a new measurement in the industry known as "Fast Neutron Cross Section" (FNXS), oil saturation from the total organic carbon (TOC) log, mineral volumes solved from formation elemental concentrations from energy domain, and porosity from hydrogen index obtained from the spectroscopy time domain, is presented. At natural fracture level, we make use of a Borehole Acoustic Reflection Service for deep natural fracture detection and spatial orientation analysis, done at cased hole conditions. The main advantages of the new method for obtaining porosity, mineralogy, salinity-independent hydrocarbon saturation in tight matrix and natural fracture assessment behind casing are: 1) conversion of dry weight total carbon to oil saturation, and fast neutron cross section to gas saturation done through a simultaneous inversion by solving matrix-porosity-fluids volumes into an elemental analysis, proven to work at low porosities rocks; 2) independency of salinity and reservoir tortuosity effects; 3) clay and/or other lithology effects is quantified and taken into account; 4) faster logging speeds and improve tools combinability in bigger holes while ensuring full reservoir assessment in small holes; 5) operational time reduction. The spectroscopy logging is carried out in single acquisition pass at 150 to 350-feet per hour (ft/hr), whereas sonic acquisition is done at 400 ft/hr in a single pass as well.
致密储层中快中子和声波反射波套管井溶液
重要的油气聚集发生在哥伦比亚地区的致密岩中。致密储层为干净砂岩,基质孔隙度在3% ~ 4%之间,矿物学相对复杂,具有天然裂缝性。成功进行代表性地层评价依赖于获得准确的孔隙度、油、气、水饱和度、天然裂缝检测以及对储层渗透率的良好估计。基于电阻率的方法很难应用,因为储层电导率不仅受流体类型的影响,还受矿化度(通常在储层中很低)、可变弯曲度(大多在基质中很高,在裂缝中很低)和非常高的地层电阻率(高于1000欧姆)的影响。此外,由于孔隙体积小且基质评估不当,导致常规测井在测定孔隙度时误差很大(在3 - 4 p.u.的储层中,孔隙度计算误差可高达50%)。孔隙度估算中的不确定性也转化为饱和度评估中的不确定性。在尝试利用电阻率测井曲线计算饱和度时,会遇到进一步的挑战。致密砂岩采用油基泥浆钻进,形成了只能进行感应测井的测井环境。然而,由于这些岩石的电阻率范围在1000欧姆以上。在M范围内,感应测量在许多目标区域都超出了范围。其他评估流体饱和度的地层评价方法,如磁共振、sigma和碳氧测井,不能应用于孔隙度低于10的地层;而介电测量在很大程度上依赖于精确的孔隙度计算来推导碳氢化合物体积。其中一些储层也很深(17000英尺范围内),靠近山麓,在这些地方,井眼稳定性存在问题,钻井时使用的泥浆比重窗口很窄,这意味着通过随钻测井或电缆传输进行裸眼测井的风险更高,所有这些都不利于裸眼数据采集。因此,本文中的案例研究是在套管井条件下进行评估的。在本文中,我们提出了一种解决方案,涵盖了致密基质和天然裂缝的评估,达到了前所未有的水平。在紧密矩阵水平上,我们用一种新的脉冲中子装置进行了先进的核谱学,同时进行了时域和能量域的测量。本文提出了一种新的不依赖于电阻率和矿化度的方法,该方法可以通过一种业内称为“快中子截面”(FNXS)的新测量方法获得气饱和度,通过总有机碳(TOC)测井获得油饱和度,通过地层元素浓度从能量域求解矿物体积,通过光谱时域获得氢指数。在天然裂缝层,我们利用井眼声反射服务在套管井条件下进行深部天然裂缝探测和空间定向分析。新方法在获取致密基质孔隙度、矿物学、非盐度烃饱和度和套管后天然裂缝评估方面的主要优点是:1)通过将基质-孔隙度-流体体积求解为元素分析,通过同时反演,将干重总碳转化为油饱和度,将快中子截面转化为气饱和度,这一方法已被证明适用于低孔隙度岩石;2)矿化度和储层弯曲度的独立性;3)粘土和/或其他岩性影响被量化并考虑在内;4)提高大井的测井速度和提高工具的可组合性,同时确保对小井进行全面的储层评价;5)减少操作时间。光谱测井以150至350英尺/小时(ft/hr)的速度进行单次采集,而声波测井也以400英尺/小时的速度进行单次采集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信