The impact of bookmarks and annotations on refinding information

Ricardo Kawase, G. Papadakis, E. Herder, W. Nejdl
{"title":"The impact of bookmarks and annotations on refinding information","authors":"Ricardo Kawase, G. Papadakis, E. Herder, W. Nejdl","doi":"10.1145/1810617.1810624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Refinding information has been interwoven with web activity since its early beginning. Even though all common web browsers were equipped with a history list and bookmarks early enough to facilitate this need, most users typically use search engines to refind information. However, both bookmarks and search based tools have significant limitations that impact their usability: the former are known to be hard to manage over the course of time, whereas the latter require the user to recall a specific combination of keywords or context. Most importantly, though, both are particularly inappropriate in cases where a piece of information is contained within an unstructured web page. In this paper, we present in-context annotation as a more efficient alternative to these methodologies. To verify this claim, we conducted a study in which we compare the performance of experienced users in all three approaches while revisiting specific pieces of information in the web after a long period of time. The outcomes suggest that in-context annotation clearly outperforms both traditional strategies.","PeriodicalId":91270,"journal":{"name":"HT ... : the proceedings of the ... ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media","volume":"9 1","pages":"29-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HT ... : the proceedings of the ... ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1810617.1810624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Refinding information has been interwoven with web activity since its early beginning. Even though all common web browsers were equipped with a history list and bookmarks early enough to facilitate this need, most users typically use search engines to refind information. However, both bookmarks and search based tools have significant limitations that impact their usability: the former are known to be hard to manage over the course of time, whereas the latter require the user to recall a specific combination of keywords or context. Most importantly, though, both are particularly inappropriate in cases where a piece of information is contained within an unstructured web page. In this paper, we present in-context annotation as a more efficient alternative to these methodologies. To verify this claim, we conducted a study in which we compare the performance of experienced users in all three approaches while revisiting specific pieces of information in the web after a long period of time. The outcomes suggest that in-context annotation clearly outperforms both traditional strategies.
书签和注释对重新查找信息的影响
从一开始,重新查找信息就与网络活动交织在一起。尽管所有常见的网络浏览器都配备了历史列表和书签,以满足这种需求,但大多数用户通常使用搜索引擎来重新查找信息。然而,书签和基于搜索的工具都有影响其可用性的重大限制:众所周知,前者很难在一段时间内管理,而后者需要用户回忆关键字或上下文的特定组合。但最重要的是,当信息包含在非结构化网页中时,这两种方法都特别不合适。在本文中,我们提出了上下文注释作为这些方法的更有效的替代方法。为了验证这一说法,我们进行了一项研究,在这项研究中,我们比较了有经验的用户在很长一段时间后重新访问网络上特定信息时使用这三种方法的表现。结果表明,上下文注释明显优于两种传统策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信