Should I Stay or Should I Go Now: Wives' Participation in the Decision to Move for Their Spouses' Jobs

E. Whitaker
{"title":"Should I Stay or Should I Go Now: Wives' Participation in the Decision to Move for Their Spouses' Jobs","authors":"E. Whitaker","doi":"10.3998/MFR.4919087.0010.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, there is a national job market for employment, especially professional or managerial employment. When looking for a job or being considered for advancement within a company, individuals are competing with other job seekers nationwide, not just those in the area or within the company. Also, as more and more companies expand and become national--even global--possibilities within a company are geographically widespread. More and more people are asked or expected to relocate to other areas of the country in order to take a job, keep a job, or advance in a job. Hodson and Sullivan (2002) pointed out that more than half of all moves in the United States are believed to be work-related and that \"promotions, new job responsibilities and even just job retention are sometimes attached to geographic moves\" (p. 79).This study examined families with heterosexual, married spouses in the professional middle class and upper middle class whose employers have come to regard employee corporate relocation as commonplace and normative. In many cases, for professional middle-class jobs, employers subsidize moves by paying for move expenses and transaction costs associated with home sales and purchases (Worldwide Employee Relocation Council, 2005). Commonly, professional middle-class and upper-middle-class employees are relocated or asked to relocate repeatedly, \"sometimes as often as every two or three years and, on average, every five to seven years\" (Eby & Russell, 2000, p. 44).Hodson et al. (2002) contend that \"frequent transfer is a technique firms use to train managers and initiate them into the company\" (p. 313). Employers are so interested in maintaining a mobile workforce that they have formed committees, councils, and lobbying organizations that serve to research barriers to relocation; devise strategies to encourage relocation; reduce the attendant costs; and follow legislation that can impact relocation. These initiatives include the Worldwide Employee Relocation Council (ERC); national organizations like the Canadian Relocation Council; statewide organizations, such as the Kentucky Relocation Council; and regional, city-wide, or community-wide organizations like the Chicago Relocation Council.According to the Worldwide ERC, one trade association for individuals and businesses with an interest in workforce mobility, there are approximately 500,000 corporate-paid employee relocations within the U.S. each year. There is no available data on how many of those 500,000 moves involve children, but estimates say that about 80 percent of relocated employees are married (Eby & Russell, 2000). Using a conservative estimate of an average of two people being moved in each case, we can calculate that this phenomenon affects at least one million people each year including moved employees, spouses, and their dependent children.When families are moved to a new community to facilitate a job change for one member of the family, the other members of the family are affected in a variety of ways. There may be some benefits from the move, but there are also costs. An employee's family members must give up their previous home, including the physical dwelling and the surrounding community with its offerings or lack of offerings of arts, activities, stores, scenery, etc. Also, they give up a sense of familiarity, and they give up the close proximity to individuals and organizations with whom they were connected and from whom they drew varying levels of resources such as companionship or support. In some cases, this effect is large. In other cases it is small. And the effect often differs for different members of a family. The cost may be high or low depending on the degree to which the community and its accompaniments factored into the family member's life and the degree to which it was currently meeting the family member's needs. A feminist approach to examining the topic reveals the ways in which these costs are highly gendered. …","PeriodicalId":32430,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Family Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Family Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/MFR.4919087.0010.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In the United States, there is a national job market for employment, especially professional or managerial employment. When looking for a job or being considered for advancement within a company, individuals are competing with other job seekers nationwide, not just those in the area or within the company. Also, as more and more companies expand and become national--even global--possibilities within a company are geographically widespread. More and more people are asked or expected to relocate to other areas of the country in order to take a job, keep a job, or advance in a job. Hodson and Sullivan (2002) pointed out that more than half of all moves in the United States are believed to be work-related and that "promotions, new job responsibilities and even just job retention are sometimes attached to geographic moves" (p. 79).This study examined families with heterosexual, married spouses in the professional middle class and upper middle class whose employers have come to regard employee corporate relocation as commonplace and normative. In many cases, for professional middle-class jobs, employers subsidize moves by paying for move expenses and transaction costs associated with home sales and purchases (Worldwide Employee Relocation Council, 2005). Commonly, professional middle-class and upper-middle-class employees are relocated or asked to relocate repeatedly, "sometimes as often as every two or three years and, on average, every five to seven years" (Eby & Russell, 2000, p. 44).Hodson et al. (2002) contend that "frequent transfer is a technique firms use to train managers and initiate them into the company" (p. 313). Employers are so interested in maintaining a mobile workforce that they have formed committees, councils, and lobbying organizations that serve to research barriers to relocation; devise strategies to encourage relocation; reduce the attendant costs; and follow legislation that can impact relocation. These initiatives include the Worldwide Employee Relocation Council (ERC); national organizations like the Canadian Relocation Council; statewide organizations, such as the Kentucky Relocation Council; and regional, city-wide, or community-wide organizations like the Chicago Relocation Council.According to the Worldwide ERC, one trade association for individuals and businesses with an interest in workforce mobility, there are approximately 500,000 corporate-paid employee relocations within the U.S. each year. There is no available data on how many of those 500,000 moves involve children, but estimates say that about 80 percent of relocated employees are married (Eby & Russell, 2000). Using a conservative estimate of an average of two people being moved in each case, we can calculate that this phenomenon affects at least one million people each year including moved employees, spouses, and their dependent children.When families are moved to a new community to facilitate a job change for one member of the family, the other members of the family are affected in a variety of ways. There may be some benefits from the move, but there are also costs. An employee's family members must give up their previous home, including the physical dwelling and the surrounding community with its offerings or lack of offerings of arts, activities, stores, scenery, etc. Also, they give up a sense of familiarity, and they give up the close proximity to individuals and organizations with whom they were connected and from whom they drew varying levels of resources such as companionship or support. In some cases, this effect is large. In other cases it is small. And the effect often differs for different members of a family. The cost may be high or low depending on the degree to which the community and its accompaniments factored into the family member's life and the degree to which it was currently meeting the family member's needs. A feminist approach to examining the topic reveals the ways in which these costs are highly gendered. …
我该走还是该留:妻子参与配偶跳槽的决定
在美国,有一个全国性的就业市场,特别是专业或管理工作。在找工作或被考虑在公司内部晋升时,个人是在与全国范围内的其他求职者竞争,而不仅仅是该地区或公司内部的求职者。此外,随着越来越多的公司扩张并成为全国性甚至全球性的公司,公司内部的可能性在地理上是广泛的。越来越多的人被要求或期望搬迁到国家的其他地区,以便找到一份工作,保住一份工作,或在工作中获得晋升。Hodson和Sullivan(2002)指出,在美国,超过一半的迁移被认为是与工作相关的,而且“晋升、新工作职责甚至只是保留工作有时都与地理迁移有关”(第79页)。这项研究调查了在职业中产阶级和中上层阶级中有异性恋已婚配偶的家庭,这些家庭的雇主已经开始认为员工跳槽是司空见惯和规范的。在许多情况下,对于专业的中产阶级工作,雇主通过支付搬家费用和与房屋销售和购买相关的交易成本来补贴搬家(全球员工搬迁委员会,2005年)。通常,专业的中产阶级和中上层阶级员工会被重新安置或被反复要求重新安置,“有时每两到三年一次,平均每五到七年一次”(Eby & Russell, 2000, p. 44)。Hodson等人(2002)认为“频繁调动是企业用来培训管理人员并使他们进入公司的一种技术”(第313页)。雇主们对保持流动劳动力非常感兴趣,他们成立了委员会、理事会和游说组织,研究搬迁的障碍;制定鼓励搬迁的策略;降低相关成本;并遵循可能影响搬迁的法律。这些举措包括全球员工重新安置委员会(ERC);加拿大移民委员会等全国性组织;全州组织,如肯塔基州搬迁委员会;以及像芝加哥搬迁委员会这样的区域性、全市或社区组织。据关注劳动力流动的个人和企业行业协会Worldwide ERC称,美国每年约有50万名由公司支付薪酬的员工搬迁。目前还没有数据表明,在这50万次搬迁中,有多少涉及到孩子,但据估计,大约80%的搬迁员工已婚(Eby & Russell, 2000)。使用保守估计,在每种情况下平均有两人搬迁,我们可以计算出这种现象每年至少影响一百万人,包括搬迁的员工、配偶和他们的受抚养子女。当一个家庭搬到一个新的社区,以促进一个家庭成员的工作变化,家庭的其他成员在各种方面受到影响。此举可能会带来一些好处,但也有代价。雇员的家庭成员必须放弃他们以前的家,包括物理住所和周围的社区,提供或缺乏艺术,活动,商店,风景等。此外,他们放弃了熟悉感,放弃了与他们有联系的个人和组织的亲密关系,放弃了从他们那里获得不同程度的资源,如陪伴或支持。在某些情况下,这种影响很大。在其他情况下,它很小。而且对不同家庭成员的影响也不同。费用可能高或低,取决于社区及其陪伴者对家庭成员生活的影响程度,以及社区目前满足家庭成员需要的程度。用女权主义的方法来研究这个话题,可以发现这些成本是高度性别化的。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书