Evaluation of Mindful Eating Levels among Adolescents of Different BMI Category

P. Vijayakumar, Sayeda Amina Hermein Nazeer
{"title":"Evaluation of Mindful Eating Levels among Adolescents of Different BMI Category","authors":"P. Vijayakumar, Sayeda Amina Hermein Nazeer","doi":"10.21048/ijnd.2023.60.2.30341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India faces a steadily increasing prevalence of dual weight burden among adolescents. This study aims to evaluate the eating patterns and mindful eating level of adolescents of different BMI category. A cross sectional study was conducted with 130 adolescents, aged 12-15 years, recruited through quota sampling from government and private schools of Urban Bengaluru. The nutritional status were assessed as prescribed by WHO anthropometric data through standardised stadiometer and weighing scale protocols. Mindful eating level was assessed through a validated Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ). Most of the adolescent subjects were following non-vegetarian diets, where majority of them (47.7%) were observed to have BMI categorised as underweight. Mindful eating practices showed statistically significant (p< 0.05) scores under moderate level by closely half of the subjects and low level by 1/3rd on the MEQ tool. Dual burden of malnutrition that is underweight and obesity was prevalent in the study population. This can be attributed to the sedentary lifestyle coupled with mindless eating. Empowering mindful eating approach would appear to be a strategy in combating the double burden of malnutrition.","PeriodicalId":22457,"journal":{"name":"The Indian journal of nutrition and dietetics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian journal of nutrition and dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21048/ijnd.2023.60.2.30341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India faces a steadily increasing prevalence of dual weight burden among adolescents. This study aims to evaluate the eating patterns and mindful eating level of adolescents of different BMI category. A cross sectional study was conducted with 130 adolescents, aged 12-15 years, recruited through quota sampling from government and private schools of Urban Bengaluru. The nutritional status were assessed as prescribed by WHO anthropometric data through standardised stadiometer and weighing scale protocols. Mindful eating level was assessed through a validated Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ). Most of the adolescent subjects were following non-vegetarian diets, where majority of them (47.7%) were observed to have BMI categorised as underweight. Mindful eating practices showed statistically significant (p< 0.05) scores under moderate level by closely half of the subjects and low level by 1/3rd on the MEQ tool. Dual burden of malnutrition that is underweight and obesity was prevalent in the study population. This can be attributed to the sedentary lifestyle coupled with mindless eating. Empowering mindful eating approach would appear to be a strategy in combating the double burden of malnutrition.
不同BMI类别青少年正念饮食水平的评价
印度青少年的双重体重负担日益普遍。本研究旨在评估不同BMI类别青少年的饮食模式和正念饮食水平。横断面研究对130名12-15岁的青少年进行了研究,这些青少年通过配额抽样从班加罗尔城市的政府和私立学校招募。营养状况根据世界卫生组织人体测量数据,通过标准化体重计和体重秤方案进行评估。通过有效的正念饮食问卷(MEQ)评估正念饮食水平。大多数青少年受试者遵循非素食饮食,其中大多数(47.7%)被观察到BMI被归类为体重过轻。正念饮食习惯在MEQ工具上的得分有统计学意义(p< 0.05),接近一半的受试者得分在中等水平以下,三分之一的受试者得分在低水平。营养不良的双重负担即体重过轻和肥胖在研究人群中普遍存在。这可以归因于久坐不动的生活方式和盲目的饮食。加强正念饮食似乎是对抗营养不良双重负担的一种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信