B. Yağız, B. N. Coşkun, Zeliha Kubra Cakan, Gamze Uçan Gündüz, Özgür Yalçınbayır, Serkan Yazici, H. Saricaoğlu, H. E. Dalkılıç, Y. Pehlivan
{"title":"Biological Agent Use in Behçet's Patients Who Are Resistant to Conventional Treatments: A Multidisciplinary Retrospective Study","authors":"B. Yağız, B. N. Coşkun, Zeliha Kubra Cakan, Gamze Uçan Gündüz, Özgür Yalçınbayır, Serkan Yazici, H. Saricaoğlu, H. E. Dalkılıç, Y. Pehlivan","doi":"10.46310/tjim.1144532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Comparing treatment modalities is difficult in Behcet's syndrome, even if tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors are a treatment option for all involvements resistant to conventional therapy. This study evaluated how different departments dealt with treatment, particularly with TNF-α inhibitors. \nMaterial and Methods The study comprised 111 patients from our Behcet's syndrome cohort who were treated with TNF-α inhibitors between 2010 and 2019. Data on patients were retrieved retrospectively from the rheumatology, ophthalmology, and dermatology clinics' patient records. \nResults Patients followed up in rheumatology (n: 40) were classified as Group 1, and patients followed up in ophthalmology (n: 49) and dermatology (n: 5) as Group 2. In Group 1, genital ulcers, erythema nodosum (p=0.009, p=0.003, respectively), lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, arterial aneurysm and neurological involvement were more common (p=0.005, p=0.008, p=0.001, respectively). In Group 2, the use of cyclosporine and interferon-α before the anti-TNF agent was higher (p","PeriodicalId":23372,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46310/tjim.1144532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Comparing treatment modalities is difficult in Behcet's syndrome, even if tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors are a treatment option for all involvements resistant to conventional therapy. This study evaluated how different departments dealt with treatment, particularly with TNF-α inhibitors.
Material and Methods The study comprised 111 patients from our Behcet's syndrome cohort who were treated with TNF-α inhibitors between 2010 and 2019. Data on patients were retrieved retrospectively from the rheumatology, ophthalmology, and dermatology clinics' patient records.
Results Patients followed up in rheumatology (n: 40) were classified as Group 1, and patients followed up in ophthalmology (n: 49) and dermatology (n: 5) as Group 2. In Group 1, genital ulcers, erythema nodosum (p=0.009, p=0.003, respectively), lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, arterial aneurysm and neurological involvement were more common (p=0.005, p=0.008, p=0.001, respectively). In Group 2, the use of cyclosporine and interferon-α before the anti-TNF agent was higher (p