In Defence of the Normative Account of Ignorance.

Northern Journal of Applied Forestry Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-26 DOI:10.1007/s10670-022-00529-7
Anne Meylan
{"title":"In Defence of the Normative Account of Ignorance.","authors":"Anne Meylan","doi":"10.1007/s10670-022-00529-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The standard view of ignorance is that it consists in the mere lack of knowledge or true belief. Duncan Pritchard has recently argued, against the standard view, that ignorance is the lack of knowledge/true belief that is due to an improper inquiry. I shall call, Pritchard's alternative account the Normative Account. The purpose of this article is to strengthen the Normative Account by providing an independent vargument supporting it.</p>","PeriodicalId":19281,"journal":{"name":"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry","volume":"9 1","pages":"207-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10827968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00529-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The standard view of ignorance is that it consists in the mere lack of knowledge or true belief. Duncan Pritchard has recently argued, against the standard view, that ignorance is the lack of knowledge/true belief that is due to an improper inquiry. I shall call, Pritchard's alternative account the Normative Account. The purpose of this article is to strengthen the Normative Account by providing an independent vargument supporting it.

为 "无知的规范性解释 "辩护。
关于无知的标准观点认为,无知仅仅是缺乏知识或真实信念。邓肯-普里查德(Duncan Pritchard)最近反驳了这一标准观点,认为无知是由于不恰当的探究而导致的知识/真实信念的缺乏。我将把普里查德的另一种说法称为 "规范说"。本文的目的是通过提供支持规范说的独立论据来加强规范说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信