‘Truth’, technology and transmedial theatre in Europe

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
A. Scheer, Siobhán O’Gorman
{"title":"‘Truth’, technology and transmedial theatre in Europe","authors":"A. Scheer, Siobhán O’Gorman","doi":"10.1080/14682761.2021.1964850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent scholarship has expanded upon the concept of populism as performance to include a focus on how it employs digital technologies (Baldwin-Philippi 2018). However, a relatively unexplored dimension of such discussion is the relationship between political and ‘artistic’ or theatrical performances of populism. If the latter appropriate right-wing populist discourse to potentially parody how it frames its nationalist rhetoric as an ‘appeal to “the people”’ (Canovan 1999, 3), then how do the relationships between performers and spectator-participants differ from those forged through public manifestations of populist politics? How have artists who engage with populism employed technology to increase the reach and interactivity of their performances, and how does this seek to undermine, and/or generate a troubling ‘belief’ in, the supposed ‘reality’ of such projects? This article examines two selected performances, from Austria and Estonia, that sought to engage subversively with the rise of far-right populism through arts practice developed across multiple media: Christoph Schlingensief’s Please Love Austria – first European coalition week! (2000) and Theatre NO99’s Unified Estonia (2010). These two events were exemplary in their respective engagements with increasingly technologized media to interrogate right-wing populisms in performances that drew widespread public attention, nationally and internationally. Schlingensief created an international controversy with his performance event Please Love Austria! in which a group of asylum-seekers were transported to a temporary site consisting of shipping containers located in the centre of Vienna where they would reside for 7 days. Via a dedicated website, Austrians were invited to vote out the foreigner they wished to see ‘deported’ the most. This public action, which sought to mirror the anti-immigration policies of Jörg Haider’s populist, far-right Freedom Party Austria (FPÖ), was reported worldwide to the detriment of Austria’s preferred centre-right, bourgeois national image. Ten years later, in Estonia (known for its technological advancement), Tallinn-based theatre company NO99 held a press conference announcing their largest show to date which would culminate in a public convention for an audience of 7200. This 44-day-long project involved NO99","PeriodicalId":42067,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Theatre and Performance","volume":"28 1","pages":"263 - 280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Theatre and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2021.1964850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent scholarship has expanded upon the concept of populism as performance to include a focus on how it employs digital technologies (Baldwin-Philippi 2018). However, a relatively unexplored dimension of such discussion is the relationship between political and ‘artistic’ or theatrical performances of populism. If the latter appropriate right-wing populist discourse to potentially parody how it frames its nationalist rhetoric as an ‘appeal to “the people”’ (Canovan 1999, 3), then how do the relationships between performers and spectator-participants differ from those forged through public manifestations of populist politics? How have artists who engage with populism employed technology to increase the reach and interactivity of their performances, and how does this seek to undermine, and/or generate a troubling ‘belief’ in, the supposed ‘reality’ of such projects? This article examines two selected performances, from Austria and Estonia, that sought to engage subversively with the rise of far-right populism through arts practice developed across multiple media: Christoph Schlingensief’s Please Love Austria – first European coalition week! (2000) and Theatre NO99’s Unified Estonia (2010). These two events were exemplary in their respective engagements with increasingly technologized media to interrogate right-wing populisms in performances that drew widespread public attention, nationally and internationally. Schlingensief created an international controversy with his performance event Please Love Austria! in which a group of asylum-seekers were transported to a temporary site consisting of shipping containers located in the centre of Vienna where they would reside for 7 days. Via a dedicated website, Austrians were invited to vote out the foreigner they wished to see ‘deported’ the most. This public action, which sought to mirror the anti-immigration policies of Jörg Haider’s populist, far-right Freedom Party Austria (FPÖ), was reported worldwide to the detriment of Austria’s preferred centre-right, bourgeois national image. Ten years later, in Estonia (known for its technological advancement), Tallinn-based theatre company NO99 held a press conference announcing their largest show to date which would culminate in a public convention for an audience of 7200. This 44-day-long project involved NO99
欧洲的“真相”、技术和跨媒体戏剧
最近的学术研究扩大了民粹主义作为表演的概念,包括关注民粹主义如何使用数字技术(Baldwin-Philippi 2018)。然而,这种讨论的一个相对未被探索的维度是民粹主义的政治与“艺术”或戏剧表演之间的关系。如果后者适合右翼民粹主义话语,以潜在地模仿它如何将其民族主义修辞框架为“对“人民”的呼吁”(Canovan 1993,3),那么表演者和观众-参与者之间的关系与通过民粹主义政治的公开表现形成的关系有何不同?参与民粹主义的艺术家如何利用技术来增加他们表演的影响力和互动性,这是如何试图破坏和/或产生一种令人不安的“信仰”,即这些项目的所谓“现实”?本文考察了奥地利和爱沙尼亚的两场精选表演,它们试图通过跨多种媒体发展的艺术实践颠覆性地参与极右翼民粹主义的崛起:克里斯托弗·施林根西夫的《请爱奥地利——第一个欧洲联盟周》!(2000)和NO99剧院的《统一的爱沙尼亚》(2010)。这两个事件在各自与日益技术化的媒体的接触中成为典范,在表演中质疑右翼民粹主义,引起了国内外公众的广泛关注。施林根西夫的演出“请爱奥地利!”在国际上引起了争议。其中一群寻求庇护者被运送到位于维也纳市中心的一个由集装箱组成的临时地点,他们将在那里居住7天。通过一个专门的网站,奥地利人被邀请投票选出他们最希望看到“驱逐出境”的外国人。这一公开行动旨在反映Jörg海德尔的民粹主义极右翼奥地利自由党(FPÖ)的反移民政策,全世界都报道了这一行动,损害了奥地利首选的中右翼资产阶级国家形象。十年后,在爱沙尼亚(以其技术进步而闻名),总部位于塔林的NO99剧院公司举行了一场新闻发布会,宣布他们迄今为止规模最大的演出,并在7200名观众的公共大会上达到高潮。这个长达44天的项目涉及NO99
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信