Model update for mesospheric/thermospheric nitric oxide

P.K. Swaminathan , D.F. Strobel , L. Acton , L.J. Paxton
{"title":"Model update for mesospheric/thermospheric nitric oxide","authors":"P.K. Swaminathan ,&nbsp;D.F. Strobel ,&nbsp;L. Acton ,&nbsp;L.J. Paxton","doi":"10.1016/S1464-1917(01)00042-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In reviewing the large deficit in model predictions of nitric oxide (NO) abundance near the mesosphere/lower thermosphere [NO] peak region, this paper shows that the deficit is now largely reduced using an updated model. Prior model/data comparison study (Swaminathan, 1998) which included comprehensive chemistry, contemporaneously measured solar soft x ray flux, and time-dependence of the suprathermal N(<sup>4</sup>S) atom source, pointed to a large net deficit based on current NO chemistry. Although the suprathermal source has been invoked for many decades, its importance has been recently disestablished (Balakrishnan 1998). The present update to the model has no suprathermal N(<sup>4</sup>S) source, a recently measured higher NO<sup>+</sup> recombination branching ratio and extended empirical solar x ray wavelength coverage based on combined YOHKOH and SNOE solar x ray flux data; and it is found that the large deficit is no longer present. The model predicts [NO] peak density within 30% of the data after accounting for the ever-present auroral transport contribution derived by Barth (1999) from recent SNOE measurements. This result dramatically impacts the thermospheric nitric oxide abundance problem that has existed for many decades. Further search for minor NO chemical sources is only appropriate while also quantifying the role of multidimensional atmospheric dynamics in detailed model/data comparisons.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101026,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part C: Solar, Terrestrial & Planetary Science","volume":"26 7","pages":"Pages 533-537"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-1917(01)00042-3","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part C: Solar, Terrestrial & Planetary Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464191701000423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In reviewing the large deficit in model predictions of nitric oxide (NO) abundance near the mesosphere/lower thermosphere [NO] peak region, this paper shows that the deficit is now largely reduced using an updated model. Prior model/data comparison study (Swaminathan, 1998) which included comprehensive chemistry, contemporaneously measured solar soft x ray flux, and time-dependence of the suprathermal N(4S) atom source, pointed to a large net deficit based on current NO chemistry. Although the suprathermal source has been invoked for many decades, its importance has been recently disestablished (Balakrishnan 1998). The present update to the model has no suprathermal N(4S) source, a recently measured higher NO+ recombination branching ratio and extended empirical solar x ray wavelength coverage based on combined YOHKOH and SNOE solar x ray flux data; and it is found that the large deficit is no longer present. The model predicts [NO] peak density within 30% of the data after accounting for the ever-present auroral transport contribution derived by Barth (1999) from recent SNOE measurements. This result dramatically impacts the thermospheric nitric oxide abundance problem that has existed for many decades. Further search for minor NO chemical sources is only appropriate while also quantifying the role of multidimensional atmospheric dynamics in detailed model/data comparisons.

中间层/热层一氧化氮模式更新
在回顾了在中间层/低层热层[NO]峰值区附近的一氧化氮(NO)丰度模式预测中的巨大缺陷后,本文表明,使用更新的模式,现在该缺陷已大大减少。先前的模型/数据比较研究(Swaminathan, 1998)包括综合化学、同时测量的太阳软x射线通量和超高温N(4S)原子源的时间依赖性,指出基于当前NO化学的巨大净赤字。虽然超热源已经被引用了几十年,但它的重要性最近才被取消(Balakrishnan 1998)。基于YOHKOH和SNOE联合太阳x射线通量数据,该模型的更新不含超高温N(4S)源,最近测量到更高的no +复合分支比和扩大的经验太阳x射线波长覆盖范围;人们发现,巨大的赤字不再存在。在考虑了Barth(1999)从最近的SNOE测量中得出的一直存在的极光传输贡献后,该模型预测的[NO]峰值密度在数据的30%以内。这一结果极大地影响了已经存在了几十年的热层一氧化氮丰度问题。进一步寻找少量的NO化学源是适当的,同时也要在详细的模式/数据比较中量化多维大气动力学的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信