Systematic Literature Review on ICF From 2001 to 2013 in the Nordic Countries Focusing on Clinical and Rehabilitation Context.

ANA clinical conferences Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-12-03 DOI:10.14740/jocmr2400w
Thomas Maribo, Kirsten S Petersen, Charlotte Handberg, Hanne Melchiorsen, Anne-Mette H Momsen, Claus V Nielsen, Matilde Leonardi, Merete Labriola
{"title":"Systematic Literature Review on ICF From 2001 to 2013 in the Nordic Countries Focusing on Clinical and Rehabilitation Context.","authors":"Thomas Maribo, Kirsten S Petersen, Charlotte Handberg, Hanne Melchiorsen, Anne-Mette H Momsen, Claus V Nielsen, Matilde Leonardi, Merete Labriola","doi":"10.14740/jocmr2400w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present a systematic review on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) used in the Nordic countries from 2001 through 2013, describing and quantifying the development in utilization of ICF, and describe the extent to which the different components of the ICF have been used. A search was conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycInfo. Papers from Nordic countries were included if ICF was mentioned in title or abstract. Papers were assigned to one of eight categories covering the wide rehabilitation area; furthermore, area of focus was assigned. Use of ICF components and intervention were coded in papers categorized as \"clinical and/or rehabilitation contexts\" or \"non-clinical contexts\". One hundred seventy papers were included, of these 99 papers were from the categories \"clinical and/or rehabilitation contexts\" or \"non-clinical contexts\". Forty-two percent of the 170 included papers were published in the period 2011 - 2013. There was an increase in ICF-relevant papers from 2001 to 2013, especially in the categories \"clinical and/or rehabilitation contexts\" and \"non-clinical contexts\". The most represented focus areas were neurology, musculoskeletal, and work-related areas. All five or at least four ICF components were mentioned in the results or discussions in most papers, and activity was most frequently mentioned. </p>","PeriodicalId":78016,"journal":{"name":"ANA clinical conferences","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANA clinical conferences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2400w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present a systematic review on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) used in the Nordic countries from 2001 through 2013, describing and quantifying the development in utilization of ICF, and describe the extent to which the different components of the ICF have been used. A search was conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycInfo. Papers from Nordic countries were included if ICF was mentioned in title or abstract. Papers were assigned to one of eight categories covering the wide rehabilitation area; furthermore, area of focus was assigned. Use of ICF components and intervention were coded in papers categorized as "clinical and/or rehabilitation contexts" or "non-clinical contexts". One hundred seventy papers were included, of these 99 papers were from the categories "clinical and/or rehabilitation contexts" or "non-clinical contexts". Forty-two percent of the 170 included papers were published in the period 2011 - 2013. There was an increase in ICF-relevant papers from 2001 to 2013, especially in the categories "clinical and/or rehabilitation contexts" and "non-clinical contexts". The most represented focus areas were neurology, musculoskeletal, and work-related areas. All five or at least four ICF components were mentioned in the results or discussions in most papers, and activity was most frequently mentioned.

2001 年至 2013 年北欧国家关于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的系统性文献综述,重点关注临床和康复背景。
我们对 2001 年至 2013 年北欧国家使用的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)进行了系统性回顾,描述并量化了 ICF 的使用发展情况,并描述了 ICF 不同组成部分的使用程度。我们在 EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 PsycInfo 中进行了检索。如果标题或摘要中提到 ICF,则包括来自北欧国家的论文。论文被归入涵盖广泛康复领域的八个类别之一;此外,还指定了重点领域。在归类为 "临床和/或康复背景 "或 "非临床背景 "的论文中,对 ICF 要素和干预措施的使用进行了编码。共收录了 170 篇论文,其中 99 篇属于 "临床和/或康复背景 "或 "非临床背景 "类别。在收录的170篇论文中,42%发表于2011-2013年间。从 2001 年到 2013 年,与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》相关的论文有所增加,尤其是在 "临床和/或康复背景 "和 "非临床背景 "类别中。代表性最强的重点领域是神经学、肌肉骨骼和工作相关领域。大多数论文的结果或讨论中都提到了《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的所有五个或至少四个组成部分,其中最常提到的是活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信