Assessing the Likelihood of Hand-to-Hand Cross-Transmission of Bacteria: An Experimental Study

F. Bellissimo-Rodrigues, D. Pires, H. Soule, A. Gayet-Ageron, D. Pittet
{"title":"Assessing the Likelihood of Hand-to-Hand Cross-Transmission of Bacteria: An Experimental Study","authors":"F. Bellissimo-Rodrigues, D. Pires, H. Soule, A. Gayet-Ageron, D. Pittet","doi":"10.1017/ice.2017.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Although the hands of healthcare workers (HCWs) are implicated in most episodes of healthcare-associated infections, the correlation between hand contamination and the likelihood of cross-transmission remains unknown. METHODS We conducted a laboratory-based study involving pairs of HCWs. The hands of a HCW (transmitter) were contaminated with Escherichia coli ATCC 10536 before holding hands with another HCW (host) for 1 minute. Meanwhile, the unheld hand of the transmitter was sampled. Afterward, the host’s held hand was also sampled. Each experiment consisted of 4 trials with increasing concentrations of E. coli (103–106 colony-forming units [cfu]/mL). The primary outcome was the likelihood of transmission of at least 1 cfu from transmitter to host. We used a mixed logistic regression model with a random effect on the subject to assess the association between transmission and bacterial count on the transmitter’s hands. RESULTS In total, 6 HCWs performed 30 experiments and 120 trials. The bacterial counts recovered from host hands were directly associated with the bacterial counts on transmitter hands (P<.001). The probability of cross-transmission was 8.22 higher (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98–68.8) when transmitter hand bacterial count was >1 and ≤3 log10 cfu compared to ≤1 log10. When transmitter contamination was <1 log10 cfu, no cross-transmission was detected. CONCLUSION There is a direct relationship between the bacterial burden on HCWs hands and the likelihood of cross-transmission. Under the described conditions, at least 1 log10 cfu must be present on HCW hands to be potentially transmitted. Further studies are needed at the low contamination range. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:553–558","PeriodicalId":13655,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology","volume":"23 1","pages":"553 - 558"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2017.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

BACKGROUND Although the hands of healthcare workers (HCWs) are implicated in most episodes of healthcare-associated infections, the correlation between hand contamination and the likelihood of cross-transmission remains unknown. METHODS We conducted a laboratory-based study involving pairs of HCWs. The hands of a HCW (transmitter) were contaminated with Escherichia coli ATCC 10536 before holding hands with another HCW (host) for 1 minute. Meanwhile, the unheld hand of the transmitter was sampled. Afterward, the host’s held hand was also sampled. Each experiment consisted of 4 trials with increasing concentrations of E. coli (103–106 colony-forming units [cfu]/mL). The primary outcome was the likelihood of transmission of at least 1 cfu from transmitter to host. We used a mixed logistic regression model with a random effect on the subject to assess the association between transmission and bacterial count on the transmitter’s hands. RESULTS In total, 6 HCWs performed 30 experiments and 120 trials. The bacterial counts recovered from host hands were directly associated with the bacterial counts on transmitter hands (P<.001). The probability of cross-transmission was 8.22 higher (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98–68.8) when transmitter hand bacterial count was >1 and ≤3 log10 cfu compared to ≤1 log10. When transmitter contamination was <1 log10 cfu, no cross-transmission was detected. CONCLUSION There is a direct relationship between the bacterial burden on HCWs hands and the likelihood of cross-transmission. Under the described conditions, at least 1 log10 cfu must be present on HCW hands to be potentially transmitted. Further studies are needed at the low contamination range. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:553–558
评估手对手细菌交叉传播的可能性:一项实验研究
背景:尽管卫生保健工作者的手与大多数卫生保健相关感染事件有关,但手污染与交叉传播可能性之间的相关性尚不清楚。方法:我们进行了一项以实验室为基础的研究,涉及对HCWs。在与另一名HCW(宿主)手牵手1分钟之前,一名HCW(传递者)的手被大肠杆菌ATCC 10536污染。同时,对发射机未握住的手进行采样。随后,主持人的手也被采样。每个试验包括4个试验,增加大肠杆菌浓度(103 ~ 106菌落形成单位[cfu]/mL)。主要结果是至少1个cfu从传递者传播到宿主的可能性。我们使用随机效应的混合逻辑回归模型来评估传播与传播者手上细菌数量之间的关系。结果6名HCWs共进行实验30次,试验120次。从宿主手上恢复的细菌计数与传递者手上的细菌计数(P1和≤3 log10 cfu)直接相关,而≤1 log10 cfu。当发射机污染<1 log10 cfu时,未检测到交叉传输。结论卫生工作者手部细菌负荷与交叉传播的可能性有直接关系。在上述条件下,至少1 log10 cfu必须存在于HCW手上才有可能传播。需要在低污染范围内进行进一步研究。中华流行病学杂志,2017;38:553-558
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信