Chest CT Scan Features to Predict COVID-19 Patients' Outcome and Survival

IF 2.2 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mohammad-Mehdi Mehrabi Nejad, Aminreza Abkhoo, F. Salahshour, M. Salehi, M. Gity, Hamidreza Komaki, S. Kolahi
{"title":"Chest CT Scan Features to Predict COVID-19 Patients' Outcome and Survival","authors":"Mohammad-Mehdi Mehrabi Nejad, Aminreza Abkhoo, F. Salahshour, M. Salehi, M. Gity, Hamidreza Komaki, S. Kolahi","doi":"10.1155/2022/4732988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Providing efficient care for infectious coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients requires an accurate and accessible tool to medically optimize medical resource allocation to high-risk patients. Purpose To assess the predictive value of on-admission chest CT characteristics to estimate COVID-19 patients' outcome and survival time. Materials and Methods Using a case-control design, we included all laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients who were deceased, from June to September 2020, in a tertiary-referral-collegiate hospital and had on-admission chest CT as the case group. The patients who did not die and were equivalent in terms of demographics and other clinical features to cases were considered as the control (survivors) group. The equivalency evaluation was performed by a fellowship-trained radiologist and an expert radiologist. Pulmonary involvement (PI) was scored (0–25) using a semiquantitative scoring tool. The PI density index was calculated by dividing the total PI score by the number of involved lung lobes. All imaging parameters were compared between case and control group members. Survival time was recorded for the case group. All demographic, clinical, and imaging variables were included in the survival analyses. Results After evaluating 384 cases, a total of 186 patients (93 in each group) were admitted to the studied setting, consisting of 126 (67.7%) male patients with a mean age of 60.4 ± 13.6 years. The PI score and PI density index in the case vs. the control group were on average 8.9 ± 4.5 vs. 10.7 ± 4.4 (p value: 0.001) and 2.0 ± 0.7 vs. 2.6 ± 0.8 (p value: 0.01), respectively. Axial distribution (p value: 0.01), cardiomegaly (p value: 0.005), pleural effusion (p value: 0.001), and pericardial effusion (p value: 0.04) were mostly observed in deceased patients. Our survival analyses demonstrated that PI score ≥ 10 (p value: 0.02) and PI density index ≥ 2.2 (p value: 0.03) were significantly associated with a lower survival rate. Conclusion On-admission chest CT features, particularly PI score and PI density index, are potential great tools to predict the patient's clinical outcome.","PeriodicalId":51864,"journal":{"name":"Radiology Research and Practice","volume":"9 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4732988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background Providing efficient care for infectious coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients requires an accurate and accessible tool to medically optimize medical resource allocation to high-risk patients. Purpose To assess the predictive value of on-admission chest CT characteristics to estimate COVID-19 patients' outcome and survival time. Materials and Methods Using a case-control design, we included all laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients who were deceased, from June to September 2020, in a tertiary-referral-collegiate hospital and had on-admission chest CT as the case group. The patients who did not die and were equivalent in terms of demographics and other clinical features to cases were considered as the control (survivors) group. The equivalency evaluation was performed by a fellowship-trained radiologist and an expert radiologist. Pulmonary involvement (PI) was scored (0–25) using a semiquantitative scoring tool. The PI density index was calculated by dividing the total PI score by the number of involved lung lobes. All imaging parameters were compared between case and control group members. Survival time was recorded for the case group. All demographic, clinical, and imaging variables were included in the survival analyses. Results After evaluating 384 cases, a total of 186 patients (93 in each group) were admitted to the studied setting, consisting of 126 (67.7%) male patients with a mean age of 60.4 ± 13.6 years. The PI score and PI density index in the case vs. the control group were on average 8.9 ± 4.5 vs. 10.7 ± 4.4 (p value: 0.001) and 2.0 ± 0.7 vs. 2.6 ± 0.8 (p value: 0.01), respectively. Axial distribution (p value: 0.01), cardiomegaly (p value: 0.005), pleural effusion (p value: 0.001), and pericardial effusion (p value: 0.04) were mostly observed in deceased patients. Our survival analyses demonstrated that PI score ≥ 10 (p value: 0.02) and PI density index ≥ 2.2 (p value: 0.03) were significantly associated with a lower survival rate. Conclusion On-admission chest CT features, particularly PI score and PI density index, are potential great tools to predict the patient's clinical outcome.
胸部CT扫描特征预测COVID-19患者的预后和生存
背景2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的高效护理需要一种准确、便捷的工具来优化高危患者的医疗资源配置。目的探讨入院时胸部CT特征对新冠肺炎患者预后及生存时间的预测价值。材料和方法采用病例对照设计,纳入了2020年6月至9月在三级转诊-大学医院死亡的所有实验室确诊的COVID-19患者,并进行了入院胸部CT作为病例组。未死亡且在人口统计学和其他临床特征方面与病例相同的患者被视为对照(幸存者)组。等效性评估由一名接受过奖学金培训的放射科医生和一名专家放射科医生进行。采用半定量评分工具对肺受累(PI)评分(0-25)。PI密度指数由PI总评分除以受累肺叶数计算。比较病例组和对照组的所有影像学参数。记录病例组的生存时间。所有的人口统计学、临床和影像学变量都包括在生存分析中。结果384例患者入组186例(每组93例),其中男性126例(67.7%),平均年龄60.4±13.6岁。与对照组相比,患者PI评分和PI密度指数分别为8.9±4.5比10.7±4.4 (p值:0.001)和2.0±0.7比2.6±0.8 (p值:0.01)。死亡患者以轴向分布(p值:0.01)、心脏肥大(p值:0.005)、胸腔积液(p值:0.001)、心包积液(p值:0.04)多见。我们的生存分析表明,PI评分≥10 (p值:0.02)和PI密度指数≥2.2 (p值:0.03)与较低的生存率显著相关。结论入院时胸部CT表现,尤其是PI评分和PI密度指数,是预测患者临床预后的潜在重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology Research and Practice
Radiology Research and Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes articles on all areas of medical imaging. The journal promotes evidence-based radiology practice though the publication of original research, reviews, and clinical studies for a multidisciplinary audience. Radiology Research and Practice is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. For more information on Article Processing charges in gen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信