A comparative appraisal of environmental conditions in two urban low-income communities in Accra, Ghana

IF 0.5 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
Ronald Reagan Gyimah, L. Frimpong, G. Anambane, R. A. Akolaa, Stephen Leonard Mensah, Harriet Danso-Abeam
{"title":"A comparative appraisal of environmental conditions in two urban low-income communities in Accra, Ghana","authors":"Ronald Reagan Gyimah, L. Frimpong, G. Anambane, R. A. Akolaa, Stephen Leonard Mensah, Harriet Danso-Abeam","doi":"10.14712/23361980.2022.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines (i) the state of environmental conditions in two low-income urban communities in Accra, Ghana, using a Participatory Rapid Assessment (PRA) method, and (ii) changes in the environmental conditions in the two low-income communities over the years using the PRA method. The PRA was augmented with qualitative interviews with selected heads of household and other stakeholders from the study communities. The results showed that environmental conditions in the two study communities were poor as indicated by the computed average scores for the environmental problem areas. However, conditions were poorer in Chorkor compared to La. The paper recommends that local governments units in Ghana must prioritise sustained, improved, and reliable funding for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) to ensure undisruptive implementation of environmental health programs and policies. This must be accompanied with improved community education and sensitization on proper sanitary practices, which have the potential to mitigate the effects of disease epidemics such as cholera in the two communities. The study also provides important perspectives on differentials in environmental conditions in low-income communities in urban Ghana.","PeriodicalId":41831,"journal":{"name":"AUC Geographica","volume":"77 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUC Geographica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2022.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines (i) the state of environmental conditions in two low-income urban communities in Accra, Ghana, using a Participatory Rapid Assessment (PRA) method, and (ii) changes in the environmental conditions in the two low-income communities over the years using the PRA method. The PRA was augmented with qualitative interviews with selected heads of household and other stakeholders from the study communities. The results showed that environmental conditions in the two study communities were poor as indicated by the computed average scores for the environmental problem areas. However, conditions were poorer in Chorkor compared to La. The paper recommends that local governments units in Ghana must prioritise sustained, improved, and reliable funding for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) to ensure undisruptive implementation of environmental health programs and policies. This must be accompanied with improved community education and sensitization on proper sanitary practices, which have the potential to mitigate the effects of disease epidemics such as cholera in the two communities. The study also provides important perspectives on differentials in environmental conditions in low-income communities in urban Ghana.
对加纳阿克拉两个城市低收入社区环境状况的比较评价
本文使用参与式快速评估(PRA)方法考察了(i)加纳阿克拉两个低收入城市社区的环境状况,以及(ii)使用参与式快速评估方法考察了这两个低收入社区多年来环境状况的变化。通过对研究社区中选定的户主和其他利益相关者的定性访谈,PRA得到了加强。结果表明,两个研究社区的环境条件较差,这是环境问题区域的计算平均分数所表明的。然而,与洛杉矶相比,乔科尔的条件更差。该报告建议,加纳的地方政府单位必须优先考虑为水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)提供持续、改进和可靠的资金,以确保环境卫生项目和政策的不间断实施。同时,必须改进社区教育,提高对适当卫生习惯的认识,这有可能减轻霍乱等流行病对两个社区的影响。该研究还为加纳城市低收入社区的环境条件差异提供了重要视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AUC Geographica
AUC Geographica GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信