Assessment of the ecological and trophic status of Lake Bafa (Turkey) based on phytoplankton

A. Sukatar, Alperen Ertaş, R. Akgül, İnci Tüney Kızılkaya
{"title":"Assessment of the ecological and trophic status of Lake Bafa (Turkey) based on phytoplankton","authors":"A. Sukatar, Alperen Ertaş, R. Akgül, İnci Tüney Kızılkaya","doi":"10.12714/EGEJFAS.38.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phytoplankton groups are one of the major quality element to be used in the evaluation of the trophic and ecological state of freshwater ecosystems according to the EU Water Framework Directive. This research was made to assess the trophic and ecological status of Lake Bafa in Turkey, on the basis of phytoplankton communities. Buyuk Menderes River is one of the most important factor that carries pollutants to Lake Bafa. The eight sampling station were assigned to evaluate the ecological and trophic state of the lake. Phytoplankton species were collected monthly for 2 years study period. Most commonly used phtoplankton indices Q index and Carlson’s Trophic State Index (TSI), and different versions of diversity indices were used to estimate trophic and ecological state of the lake. Similarities between the sampling stations were clustured by using the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic average (UPGMA), based on phytoplankton communities. Correlations between the applied indices were determined by using Pearson Correlation. After the identification of collected phytoplanktons, total of 63 taxa which belong to classis of Cyanophyceae (11.2%), Bacillariophyceae (49.2%), Chlorophyceae (23.8%), Xanthophyceae (1.5%), Euglenophyceae (11.2%) and Dinophyceae (3.1%) were detected. The 1 st and 2 nd stations were the most similar stations to each other (88%) according to phytoplankton communities. Secchi disc depth (SD) and TP played an important role in the distribution of phytoplankton species in Lake Bafa. The highest significant positive correlation was determined between Q and TSI (r = 0.987, p˂0.01). Considering the TDI values in the phytoplankton composition of the lake, it can be said that although the productivity status of the studied lake is still “ mesotrophic ”, it has a tendency towards “ eutrophic ” state. According to the Q values, the first five stations reflect the moderate ecological state, while the 6 th , 7 th and 8 th stations represent the poor ecological state.","PeriodicalId":11439,"journal":{"name":"Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","volume":"47 1","pages":"135-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12714/EGEJFAS.38.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Phytoplankton groups are one of the major quality element to be used in the evaluation of the trophic and ecological state of freshwater ecosystems according to the EU Water Framework Directive. This research was made to assess the trophic and ecological status of Lake Bafa in Turkey, on the basis of phytoplankton communities. Buyuk Menderes River is one of the most important factor that carries pollutants to Lake Bafa. The eight sampling station were assigned to evaluate the ecological and trophic state of the lake. Phytoplankton species were collected monthly for 2 years study period. Most commonly used phtoplankton indices Q index and Carlson’s Trophic State Index (TSI), and different versions of diversity indices were used to estimate trophic and ecological state of the lake. Similarities between the sampling stations were clustured by using the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic average (UPGMA), based on phytoplankton communities. Correlations between the applied indices were determined by using Pearson Correlation. After the identification of collected phytoplanktons, total of 63 taxa which belong to classis of Cyanophyceae (11.2%), Bacillariophyceae (49.2%), Chlorophyceae (23.8%), Xanthophyceae (1.5%), Euglenophyceae (11.2%) and Dinophyceae (3.1%) were detected. The 1 st and 2 nd stations were the most similar stations to each other (88%) according to phytoplankton communities. Secchi disc depth (SD) and TP played an important role in the distribution of phytoplankton species in Lake Bafa. The highest significant positive correlation was determined between Q and TSI (r = 0.987, p˂0.01). Considering the TDI values in the phytoplankton composition of the lake, it can be said that although the productivity status of the studied lake is still “ mesotrophic ”, it has a tendency towards “ eutrophic ” state. According to the Q values, the first five stations reflect the moderate ecological state, while the 6 th , 7 th and 8 th stations represent the poor ecological state.
基于浮游植物的土耳其巴法湖生态营养状况评价
根据欧盟水框架指令,浮游植物群是评价淡水生态系统营养和生态状态的主要质量要素之一。本研究以浮游植物群落为基础,对土耳其巴法湖的营养和生态状况进行了评价。Buyuk Menderes河是将污染物带到巴法湖的最重要因素之一。设置8个采样点对湖泊的生态和营养状况进行评价。每月采集浮游植物种类,为期2年。采用最常用的浮游植物指数Q指数和卡尔森营养状态指数(Carlson’s Trophic State index, TSI)以及不同版本的多样性指数来评价湖泊的营养和生态状态。采用基于浮游植物群落的非加权对群算法(UPGMA)对采样站间相似性进行聚类。应用Pearson相关法确定各指标之间的相关性。经鉴定,共检出浮游植物63个类群,分别属于蓝藻门(11.2%)、硅藻门(49.2%)、绿藻门(23.8%)、黄藻门(1.5%)、裸藻门(11.2%)和藻门(3.1%)。浮游植物群落最相似的是1站和2站(88%)。盘深(SD)和TP对八发湖浮游植物的分布有重要影响。Q和TSI之间的正相关性最高(r = 0.987, p小于0.01)。考虑到湖泊浮游植物组成中的TDI值,可以说,虽然研究湖泊的生产力状态仍处于“中营养化”状态,但有向“富营养化”状态发展的趋势。从Q值上看,前5个站点为中等生态状态,第6、7、8个站点为较差生态状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信