Assessing policy robustness under the COVID-19 crisis: an empirical study of the environmental policymaking system in Ontario, Canada

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Nayyer Mirnasl, S. Philpot, A. Akbari, K. Hipel
{"title":"Assessing policy robustness under the COVID-19 crisis: an empirical study of the environmental policymaking system in Ontario, Canada","authors":"Nayyer Mirnasl, S. Philpot, A. Akbari, K. Hipel","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2051454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Desirable robust systems retain functional reliability and legitimacy in times of crisis and show minimal sensitivity to these events. As a multifaceted crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic posed various challenges to policymaking systems around the globe. In this study, the authors evaluate changes within the environmental policymaking system in Ontario, Canada, during this crisis and analyze them in light of the robust policy design literature and its links to the broader concept of policy design success and failure. These changes are evaluated using an empirical hypothesis testing approach designed to assess the variations of key indicators in the administrative and public participation domains of Ontario’s environmental policymaking system during and before the COVID-19 pandemic. The results indicate that the system has failed to retain its functional reliability, and thus its robustness, during this crisis. The authors conclude by contextualizing these results in light of the more recent history of environmental policymaking in the province and its impacts on Ontario’s environment and offering suggestions for future research building on this empirical example.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"39 1","pages":"762 - 776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2051454","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Desirable robust systems retain functional reliability and legitimacy in times of crisis and show minimal sensitivity to these events. As a multifaceted crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic posed various challenges to policymaking systems around the globe. In this study, the authors evaluate changes within the environmental policymaking system in Ontario, Canada, during this crisis and analyze them in light of the robust policy design literature and its links to the broader concept of policy design success and failure. These changes are evaluated using an empirical hypothesis testing approach designed to assess the variations of key indicators in the administrative and public participation domains of Ontario’s environmental policymaking system during and before the COVID-19 pandemic. The results indicate that the system has failed to retain its functional reliability, and thus its robustness, during this crisis. The authors conclude by contextualizing these results in light of the more recent history of environmental policymaking in the province and its impacts on Ontario’s environment and offering suggestions for future research building on this empirical example.
评估新冠肺炎危机下的政策稳健性:对加拿大安大略省环境政策制定系统的实证研究
理想的稳健系统在危机时刻保持功能可靠性和合法性,并对这些事件表现出最小的敏感性。作为一场多方面的危机,2019冠状病毒病大流行给全球的决策系统带来了各种挑战。在这项研究中,作者评估了加拿大安大略省环境政策制定系统在此次危机期间的变化,并根据强有力的政策设计文献及其与更广泛的政策设计成功与失败概念的联系进行了分析。这些变化采用实证假设检验方法进行评估,该方法旨在评估2019冠状病毒病大流行期间和之前安大略省环境决策系统行政和公众参与领域关键指标的变化。结果表明,在这场危机中,该系统未能保持其功能可靠性,从而保持其稳健性。最后,作者根据该省环境政策制定的近代史及其对安大略省环境的影响,将这些结果置于背景中,并为基于这一实证例子的未来研究提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信