Pain score and quality of post cesarean section recovery with ERACS method

Ida Ruspita, S. Cholifah, Rafhani Rosyidah
{"title":"Pain score and quality of post cesarean section recovery with ERACS method","authors":"Ida Ruspita, S. Cholifah, Rafhani Rosyidah","doi":"10.21927/jnki.2023.11(1).1-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong><em>Background</em></strong><em>: A cesarean section must be done when regular childbirth is impossible owing to fetal or maternal health issues. One of the complications of cesarean section is pain and quality of recovery. The strategy for managing pain and quality of recovery is using the ERACS method. This method is a new technique in anesthesia with the principles of evidence-based perioperative care, a multidisciplinary approach carried out in a team, carried out on an ongoing basis, and continues to be developed.</em></p><p><strong><em>Objectives</em></strong><em>: The study aimed to use the ERACS method to calculate the pain score and the quality of recovery following cesarean section.</em></p><p><strong><em>Methods</em></strong><em>: The study was quasi-experimental with a post-test control group design. Participants in this study were mothers who had a cesarean section. The sample size in this study was 70, namely 35 treatment groups and 35 control groups. The instrument uses VAS (Visual Analog Scale) and obsQor 11</em></p><p><strong><em>Results</em></strong><em>: Statistical test for pain obtained P value = 0.000 and for quality of recovery obtained P value = 0.000</em></p><p><strong><em>Conclusions</em></strong><em>: There is a sizable distinction in pain scores carried out by the ERACS and Non ERACS methods, where the pain scores carried out by the ERACS method are lower than the non-ERACS methods, and there are differences in the quality of recovery between the ERACS and Non ERACS methods where the recovery quality scores are given by the method. ERACS is higher than non ERACS method. </em>The ERACS method can be an alternative method to reduce postoperative morbidity. Reduction of complications through reduced use of anesthetic doses. And in the future, the development of surgical techniques has reasonable goals, such as improving public health, increasing patient comfort and peace of mind during surgery, and reducing hospitalization, which indirectly reduces costs</p>","PeriodicalId":33460,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ners dan Kebidanan","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ners dan Kebidanan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21927/jnki.2023.11(1).1-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: A cesarean section must be done when regular childbirth is impossible owing to fetal or maternal health issues. One of the complications of cesarean section is pain and quality of recovery. The strategy for managing pain and quality of recovery is using the ERACS method. This method is a new technique in anesthesia with the principles of evidence-based perioperative care, a multidisciplinary approach carried out in a team, carried out on an ongoing basis, and continues to be developed.

Objectives: The study aimed to use the ERACS method to calculate the pain score and the quality of recovery following cesarean section.

Methods: The study was quasi-experimental with a post-test control group design. Participants in this study were mothers who had a cesarean section. The sample size in this study was 70, namely 35 treatment groups and 35 control groups. The instrument uses VAS (Visual Analog Scale) and obsQor 11

Results: Statistical test for pain obtained P value = 0.000 and for quality of recovery obtained P value = 0.000

Conclusions: There is a sizable distinction in pain scores carried out by the ERACS and Non ERACS methods, where the pain scores carried out by the ERACS method are lower than the non-ERACS methods, and there are differences in the quality of recovery between the ERACS and Non ERACS methods where the recovery quality scores are given by the method. ERACS is higher than non ERACS method. The ERACS method can be an alternative method to reduce postoperative morbidity. Reduction of complications through reduced use of anesthetic doses. And in the future, the development of surgical techniques has reasonable goals, such as improving public health, increasing patient comfort and peace of mind during surgery, and reducing hospitalization, which indirectly reduces costs

应用ERACS方法观察剖宫产术后疼痛评分及恢复质量
背景:当由于胎儿或产妇健康问题不能正常分娩时,必须进行剖宫产。剖宫产的并发症之一是疼痛和恢复质量。管理疼痛和恢复质量的策略是使用ERACS方法。该方法是一种新的麻醉技术,以循证围手术期护理为原则,在团队中开展多学科方法,持续开展,并不断发展。目的:应用ERACS方法计算剖宫产术后疼痛评分及恢复质量。方法:采用准实验设计,采用测试后对照组设计。这项研究的参与者是做过剖宫产手术的母亲。本研究的样本量为70例,即35个治疗组和35个对照组。仪器采用VAS (Visual analogue Scale)和obsQor进行评分。结果:疼痛的统计检验P值= 0.000,恢复质量的统计检验P值= 0.000。ERACS方法和非ERACS方法在疼痛评分上有相当大的区别,其中ERACS方法进行的疼痛评分低于非ERACS方法,并且ERACS和非ERACS方法之间的恢复质量存在差异,其中ERACS方法给出的恢复质量评分。ERACS方法优于非ERACS方法。ERACS方法是降低术后发病率的另一种方法。通过减少麻醉剂量减少并发症。而且在未来,外科技术的发展有合理的目标,比如改善公众健康,增加患者在手术过程中的舒适度和安心度,减少住院时间,从而间接降低成本
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信