A comparison of analytic thermodynamic models for gas solubility, volume dilation and heat of sorption in glassy polymeric materials

T. Banerjee , G.G. Lipscomb
{"title":"A comparison of analytic thermodynamic models for gas solubility, volume dilation and heat of sorption in glassy polymeric materials","authors":"T. Banerjee ,&nbsp;G.G. Lipscomb","doi":"10.1016/S1089-3156(00)00009-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Gas sorption<span> in polymeric materials results in gravimetric, volumetric and energetic changes. The ability to control these changes, through proper material selection, is critical in gas separation and barrier applications. We examine two analytic models for gas sorption that explicitly account for each of these changes: the elastic solid theory (ES) and the non-equilibrium lattice fluid theory (NELF). Model correlations and predictions are compared for carbon dioxide sorption in </span></span>polycarbonate<span> and tetramethyl polycarbonate. The ES model provides good correlation of sorption data using values for the carbon dioxide partial molar volume that are in good agreement with experimental data. By assigning an appropriate heat of vaporization to the carbon dioxide reference state, the model also provides good correlation of heat of sorption data. The NELF model provides good correlation of sorption data given the carbon dioxide partial molar volume data. Predicted enthalpy changes are in good agreement with the experiment but the effects of conditioning and molecular modification are not captured well. Both models are not capable of a priori predictions.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100309,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Theoretical Polymer Science","volume":"10 5","pages":"Pages 437-445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1089-3156(00)00009-X","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational and Theoretical Polymer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S108931560000009X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Gas sorption in polymeric materials results in gravimetric, volumetric and energetic changes. The ability to control these changes, through proper material selection, is critical in gas separation and barrier applications. We examine two analytic models for gas sorption that explicitly account for each of these changes: the elastic solid theory (ES) and the non-equilibrium lattice fluid theory (NELF). Model correlations and predictions are compared for carbon dioxide sorption in polycarbonate and tetramethyl polycarbonate. The ES model provides good correlation of sorption data using values for the carbon dioxide partial molar volume that are in good agreement with experimental data. By assigning an appropriate heat of vaporization to the carbon dioxide reference state, the model also provides good correlation of heat of sorption data. The NELF model provides good correlation of sorption data given the carbon dioxide partial molar volume data. Predicted enthalpy changes are in good agreement with the experiment but the effects of conditioning and molecular modification are not captured well. Both models are not capable of a priori predictions.

玻璃聚合物材料中气体溶解度、体积膨胀和吸附热的解析热力学模型的比较
高分子材料中的气体吸附会导致重量、体积和能量的变化。通过适当的材料选择来控制这些变化的能力在气体分离和屏障应用中至关重要。我们研究了气体吸收的两种解析模型,它们明确地解释了这些变化:弹性固体理论(ES)和非平衡晶格流体理论(NELF)。比较了聚碳酸酯和四甲基聚碳酸酯中二氧化碳吸附的模型相关性和预测结果。ES模型使用二氧化碳偏摩尔体积的值与实验数据很好地吻合,提供了很好的吸附数据相关性。通过将适当的汽化热分配给二氧化碳参考状态,该模型还提供了良好的吸附热数据相关性。在给定二氧化碳偏摩尔体积数据的情况下,NELF模型提供了良好的吸附数据相关性。预测的焓变与实验结果吻合较好,但没有很好地捕捉到调节和分子修饰的影响。这两个模型都不能进行先验预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信