MICRO NEEDLING VERSUS CARBON DIOXIDE FRACTIONAL LASER IN MANAGEMENT OF ACNE SCARS

PAFMJ Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v71i6.5444
Shanza Obaid, Nadia Iftikhar, A. Mashhood, A. Khokhar, Z. Zainab, Kanza Aftab
{"title":"MICRO NEEDLING VERSUS CARBON DIOXIDE FRACTIONAL LASER IN MANAGEMENT OF ACNE SCARS","authors":"Shanza Obaid, Nadia Iftikhar, A. Mashhood, A. Khokhar, Z. Zainab, Kanza Aftab","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v71i6.5444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the effectiveness of carbon dioxide fractional laser with micro needling in acne scarring. \nStudy Design: Quasi experimental study. \nPlace and Duration of Study: Department of Dermatology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital Rawalpindi, from Jun 2019 to Mar 2020. \nMethodology: Overall 40 patients with acne scars assessed by consultant dermatologist were made part of study. The patients were divided into two treatment groups through lottery method. Group A, was managed by micro needling technique, while Group B was managed by carbon dioxide fractional laser, each to be done monthly for a total of three sessions. The response was measured by the dermatologist and patients in both the groups. The side effects were also compared in both the groups. \nResults: Out of 40 patients with acne scars included in study, 17 (42.5%) underwent micro-needling while 23 (57.5%) underwent carbon dioxide fractional laser treatment after randomization. Thirty (75%) patients were female while 10 (25%) were male. The patients with acne scars responded better in carbon dioxide fractional laser group as compared to micro needling in opinion of dermatologists (p-value=0.01) and also patients themselves (p-value=0.03). Side effects were significantly higher in carbon dioxide fractional laser group as compared to micro needling (p-value=0.02). \nConclusion: Significant number of patients respond well to carbon dioxide fractional laser treatment and the response included both expert opinion and patients own opinion, but adverse effects were seen more in same group. Therefore, better response but at the cost of more adverse effects was noted.","PeriodicalId":19982,"journal":{"name":"PAFMJ","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAFMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i6.5444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of carbon dioxide fractional laser with micro needling in acne scarring. Study Design: Quasi experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Dermatology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital Rawalpindi, from Jun 2019 to Mar 2020. Methodology: Overall 40 patients with acne scars assessed by consultant dermatologist were made part of study. The patients were divided into two treatment groups through lottery method. Group A, was managed by micro needling technique, while Group B was managed by carbon dioxide fractional laser, each to be done monthly for a total of three sessions. The response was measured by the dermatologist and patients in both the groups. The side effects were also compared in both the groups. Results: Out of 40 patients with acne scars included in study, 17 (42.5%) underwent micro-needling while 23 (57.5%) underwent carbon dioxide fractional laser treatment after randomization. Thirty (75%) patients were female while 10 (25%) were male. The patients with acne scars responded better in carbon dioxide fractional laser group as compared to micro needling in opinion of dermatologists (p-value=0.01) and also patients themselves (p-value=0.03). Side effects were significantly higher in carbon dioxide fractional laser group as compared to micro needling (p-value=0.02). Conclusion: Significant number of patients respond well to carbon dioxide fractional laser treatment and the response included both expert opinion and patients own opinion, but adverse effects were seen more in same group. Therefore, better response but at the cost of more adverse effects was noted.
微针与二氧化碳激光治疗痤疮疤痕的比较
目的:比较二氧化碳分形激光与微针治疗痤疮瘢痕的疗效。研究设计:准实验研究。学习地点和时间:2019年6月至2020年3月,巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第阿联酋军事医院皮肤科。方法:共40例痤疮疤痕患者被皮肤科医生评估为研究的一部分。采用摇号法将患者分为两组。A组采用微针法治疗,B组采用二氧化碳分数激光治疗,每组每月治疗一次,共3次。两组的皮肤科医生和患者对反应进行了测量。两组的副作用也进行了比较。结果:在纳入研究的40例痤疮疤痕患者中,17例(42.5%)接受了微针治疗,23例(57.5%)接受了二氧化碳分次激光治疗。女性30例(75%),男性10例(25%)。对于痤疮疤痕患者,皮肤科医生认为二氧化碳分数激光组疗效优于微针组(p值=0.01),患者本人也认为疗效优于微针组(p值=0.03)。二氧化碳分数激光组的副作用明显高于微针组(p值=0.02)。结论:大量患者对二氧化碳分次激光治疗有良好的反应,反应包括专家意见和患者自己的意见,但同一组的不良反应较多。因此,有更好的反应,但代价是更多的不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信