A comparative study on approval of follow-on version of Sevelamer Carbonate and Glatiramer Acetate (GA) in US, EU

V. Shukla, Nisha Sankhwar
{"title":"A comparative study on approval of follow-on version of Sevelamer Carbonate and Glatiramer Acetate (GA) in US, EU","authors":"V. Shukla, Nisha Sankhwar","doi":"10.2174/2667337109666230428094012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nMany non-biological drugs, different in terms of their structure and mode of action, pharmacological classification, and therapeutic indication, have a common factor of structural complexity and are grouped as non-biological complex drugs (NBCDs). When an innovator drug nears the time of off-patent, different manufacturers attempt to produce its subsequent version, so the patients will have a cost-effective therapeutic equivalent. Since the innovator molecule is complex, its follow-on drug can be called its true generic version, if its bioavailability, bioequivalence and therapeutic equivalence to the innovator drug are demonstrated. However, it is observed that a case-to-case basis approach is implemented by European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Food and Drug Administration, US (USFDA) in the approval of such drugs and there is no uniformity observed between the two. \nIn this study, an attempt is made to study the complexity of molecules compare and understand the data requirements, and procedures adopted for the review and approval of such complex products. Therefore, drug sevelamer carbonate and glatiramer acetate are selected for the study. A methodical approach was followed. European assessment reports and drug approvals available in the orange book database of the former two regulatory agencies were studied. It is observed that the generic version of glatiramer acetate is approved as an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) by Food and Drug Administration whereas the same was approved as the hybrid application by European Medicines Agency requiring the applicant to generate and submit more data. Thus, harmonization of the regulatory requirements for the approval of follow-on versions of such complex drugs is essential for better understanding, predictability of the regulatory process, and acceleration of the drug approval process, in the interest of patients. This will help the faster access of the drugs to the patients and allow interchangeability of the innovator drugs with its cost-effective generic version.\n","PeriodicalId":72255,"journal":{"name":"Applied drug research, clinical trials and regulatory affairs","volume":"96 1-3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied drug research, clinical trials and regulatory affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2667337109666230428094012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many non-biological drugs, different in terms of their structure and mode of action, pharmacological classification, and therapeutic indication, have a common factor of structural complexity and are grouped as non-biological complex drugs (NBCDs). When an innovator drug nears the time of off-patent, different manufacturers attempt to produce its subsequent version, so the patients will have a cost-effective therapeutic equivalent. Since the innovator molecule is complex, its follow-on drug can be called its true generic version, if its bioavailability, bioequivalence and therapeutic equivalence to the innovator drug are demonstrated. However, it is observed that a case-to-case basis approach is implemented by European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Food and Drug Administration, US (USFDA) in the approval of such drugs and there is no uniformity observed between the two. In this study, an attempt is made to study the complexity of molecules compare and understand the data requirements, and procedures adopted for the review and approval of such complex products. Therefore, drug sevelamer carbonate and glatiramer acetate are selected for the study. A methodical approach was followed. European assessment reports and drug approvals available in the orange book database of the former two regulatory agencies were studied. It is observed that the generic version of glatiramer acetate is approved as an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) by Food and Drug Administration whereas the same was approved as the hybrid application by European Medicines Agency requiring the applicant to generate and submit more data. Thus, harmonization of the regulatory requirements for the approval of follow-on versions of such complex drugs is essential for better understanding, predictability of the regulatory process, and acceleration of the drug approval process, in the interest of patients. This will help the faster access of the drugs to the patients and allow interchangeability of the innovator drugs with its cost-effective generic version.
碳酸舍维拉默和醋酸格拉替拉默(GA)后续产品在美国、欧盟获批的比较研究
许多非生物药物在结构和作用方式、药理学分类、治疗指征等方面不同,但具有结构复杂性这一共同因素,被归为非生物复杂药物(NBCDs)。当一种创新药物接近非专利期时,不同的制造商试图生产其后续版本,因此患者将获得具有成本效益的等效治疗。由于创新分子是复杂的,如果证明其生物利用度,生物等效性和治疗等效性,其后续药物可以称为真正的仿制药。然而,据观察,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)和美国食品药品监督管理局(USFDA)在批准此类药物时采用了个案对个案的方法,两者之间没有一致性。在本研究中,试图研究分子的复杂性,比较和了解这些复杂产品的数据要求,以及审查和批准所采用的程序。因此,我们选择碳酸西维拉默和醋酸格拉替雷默作为研究对象。采取了有条不紊的办法。研究了前两个监管机构的橙皮书数据库中提供的欧洲评估报告和药物批准。据观察,醋酸格拉替雷默的仿制药被美国食品和药物管理局批准为简化新药申请(ANDA),而同样的仿制药被欧洲药品管理局批准为混合申请,要求申请人生成和提交更多数据。因此,为了患者的利益,协调批准此类复杂药物后续版本的监管要求对于更好地理解、监管过程的可预测性和加速药物批准过程至关重要。这将有助于患者更快地获得药物,并允许创新药物与其具有成本效益的仿制药物的互换性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信