Beläggsmodellen i svenska nationella prov

Frank Bach
{"title":"Beläggsmodellen i svenska nationella prov","authors":"Frank Bach","doi":"10.24834/educare.2023.1.698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Swedish national tests, the so-called “Beläggsmodell” is used to generate test grades in seven school subjects. This article examines the origin and effects of the “Beläggsmodell” on test scores in one of these subjects, Religious studies. Classical methods for evaluating the quality of tests are used in combination with confirmatory factor analysis. The results show that the tests have a reliability above 0.92 and that the “Beläggsmodell” reduces this in unpredictable ways for individual students. Confirmatory factor analysis shows that the tests are mainly one-dimensional, which has the consequence that the “Beläggsmodell” does not fulfill any meaningful function. Instead, it has major consequences for different students' test grades. There are examples of students who at the same total score on the test receive everything from D to A as a test grade. The large differences arise through differences in performance on a very small number of items. If, instead, the total sum is used as a basis for generating test grades, the possibilities for fair and equivalent test grades increase, as shown by examples. Responsible authorities should as soon as possible consider switching to a system where the total sum points is the basis for the test grades.","PeriodicalId":34339,"journal":{"name":"Educare","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2023.1.698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Swedish national tests, the so-called “Beläggsmodell” is used to generate test grades in seven school subjects. This article examines the origin and effects of the “Beläggsmodell” on test scores in one of these subjects, Religious studies. Classical methods for evaluating the quality of tests are used in combination with confirmatory factor analysis. The results show that the tests have a reliability above 0.92 and that the “Beläggsmodell” reduces this in unpredictable ways for individual students. Confirmatory factor analysis shows that the tests are mainly one-dimensional, which has the consequence that the “Beläggsmodell” does not fulfill any meaningful function. Instead, it has major consequences for different students' test grades. There are examples of students who at the same total score on the test receive everything from D to A as a test grade. The large differences arise through differences in performance on a very small number of items. If, instead, the total sum is used as a basis for generating test grades, the possibilities for fair and equivalent test grades increase, as shown by examples. Responsible authorities should as soon as possible consider switching to a system where the total sum points is the basis for the test grades.
在瑞典的国家考试中,所谓的“Beläggsmodell”用于生成七个学校科目的考试成绩。本文考察了“Beläggsmodell”对其中一门学科——宗教研究的考试成绩的来源和影响。评价试验质量的经典方法与验证性因子分析相结合。结果表明,测试的可靠性高于0.92,“Beläggsmodell”以不可预测的方式降低了个别学生的可靠性。验证性因子分析表明,测试主要是一维的,这导致“Beläggsmodell”不履行任何有意义的功能。相反,它会对不同学生的考试成绩产生重大影响。有一些学生在考试中获得相同的总分,但考试成绩却从D到A。巨大的差异是由于在极少数项目上的表现差异造成的。相反,如果使用总数作为产生考试成绩的基础,则公平和等效考试成绩的可能性就会增加,如示例所示。主管部门应尽快考虑改用以总分作为考试成绩基础的制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信