{"title":"MERKEZ-ÇEVRE İLİŞKİLERİNDE GELİŞMİŞLİK DÜZEYİ AÇISINDAN ÜLKELER ARASI KURUMSAL KALİTE FARKLILIKLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ","authors":"Şenay Saraç, Aykut Yağlikara","doi":"10.14780/muiibd.1135563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Institutional economics approach reveals that institutions are essential in increasing social welfare by \ncomprehensively addressing social and economic life. At the same time, institutional economics approach \nproceeds similarly to the problems discussed in the development literature. This study evaluates the \ndevelopmental differences between countries in core, semi-periphery and periphery countries according to \ninstitutional quality differences. In the first part of the analysis, the core (upper and lower), semi-periphery \n(upper, middle and lower) and periphery (upper, middle, and lower) country groups were determined by \nthe club convergence method using the data between 1990 and 2017. The second part of the analysis tests \nthe institutional approach that explains the development differences between countries for eight country \ngroups. Findings have revealed the effect of economic freedom on development in all subgroups of core, \nsemi-periphery, and peripheral countries. In addition, while the effect of democracy on development has \nan increasing effect in core and semi-periphery country groups, the results in peripheral countries are \nfound statistically insignificant.","PeriodicalId":32792,"journal":{"name":"Cukurova Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cukurova Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14780/muiibd.1135563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Institutional economics approach reveals that institutions are essential in increasing social welfare by
comprehensively addressing social and economic life. At the same time, institutional economics approach
proceeds similarly to the problems discussed in the development literature. This study evaluates the
developmental differences between countries in core, semi-periphery and periphery countries according to
institutional quality differences. In the first part of the analysis, the core (upper and lower), semi-periphery
(upper, middle and lower) and periphery (upper, middle, and lower) country groups were determined by
the club convergence method using the data between 1990 and 2017. The second part of the analysis tests
the institutional approach that explains the development differences between countries for eight country
groups. Findings have revealed the effect of economic freedom on development in all subgroups of core,
semi-periphery, and peripheral countries. In addition, while the effect of democracy on development has
an increasing effect in core and semi-periphery country groups, the results in peripheral countries are
found statistically insignificant.