Inclusive approach: a perspective towards more equitable housing provision?

IF 0.8 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
A. Manaf, Suharnomo, Hendri Yuzal, M. Fisher
{"title":"Inclusive approach: a perspective towards more equitable housing provision?","authors":"A. Manaf, Suharnomo, Hendri Yuzal, M. Fisher","doi":"10.1108/HCS-09-2016-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe purpose of this paper is to understand the dynamics of inclusive approaches to housing development programs directed at supporting low-income communities. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nThis study uses a mixed-methods approach by employing a combination of case study and survey methods, whereby the development process is studied through qualitative approaches and specific determinant comparisons of quantitative Z-tests. This study provides data from key informants: end-users (ten occupants), leaders of community-based organizations (2), and supporting non-governmental organizations (2). \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThese results indicate that an inclusive approach is more likely be able to provide low-income households with access to a variety of key resources that are identified as housing development priorities, particularly when compared with the supply-side approaches currently being promoted. \n \n \n \n \nPractical implications \n \n \n \n \nThis study helps to encourage policymakers to think about more targeted and facilitative processes to meet the needs of public housing in Indonesia, a challenge that has resulted in ironic effects, and has not met the important challenges in providing access that is adequate for the people of Indonesia. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThe current study provides data that provide evidence of positive value of inclusive approach to response the equitable issues in housing provision, particularly in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"55 4 1","pages":"81-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-09-2016-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand the dynamics of inclusive approaches to housing development programs directed at supporting low-income communities. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a mixed-methods approach by employing a combination of case study and survey methods, whereby the development process is studied through qualitative approaches and specific determinant comparisons of quantitative Z-tests. This study provides data from key informants: end-users (ten occupants), leaders of community-based organizations (2), and supporting non-governmental organizations (2). Findings These results indicate that an inclusive approach is more likely be able to provide low-income households with access to a variety of key resources that are identified as housing development priorities, particularly when compared with the supply-side approaches currently being promoted. Practical implications This study helps to encourage policymakers to think about more targeted and facilitative processes to meet the needs of public housing in Indonesia, a challenge that has resulted in ironic effects, and has not met the important challenges in providing access that is adequate for the people of Indonesia. Originality/value The current study provides data that provide evidence of positive value of inclusive approach to response the equitable issues in housing provision, particularly in Indonesia.
包容性方法:更公平的住房供应视角?
本文的目的是了解旨在支持低收入社区的包容性住房发展计划的动态。设计/方法/方法本研究采用案例研究和调查相结合的混合方法,通过定性方法和定量z检验的具体决定比较来研究开发过程。本研究提供了来自关键信息提供者的数据:最终用户(10名居住者)、社区组织领导人(2)和支持的非政府组织(2)。这些结果表明,包容性方法更有可能为低收入家庭提供获得各种关键资源的途径,这些资源被确定为住房发展的优先事项,特别是与目前正在推广的供应侧方法相比。本研究有助于鼓励政策制定者思考更有针对性和便利的过程,以满足印度尼西亚的公共住房需求,这一挑战导致了具有讽刺意味的影响,并没有满足为印度尼西亚人民提供足够的住房的重要挑战。原创性/价值目前的研究提供的数据证明了包容性方法在应对住房供应公平问题方面的积极价值,特别是在印度尼西亚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信