Seeking the right balance between three teaching approaches: a quasi-experimental study in the context of learning about thermal phenomena

IF 0.2 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Seeking the right balance between three teaching approaches: a quasi-experimental study in the context of learning about thermal phenomena","authors":"","doi":"10.35666/2232-7266.2021.57.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we investigated which teaching approach may be optimal to facilitate learning about thermal phenomena in primary school. Concretely, we conducted a pretest-posttest quasi-experiment that included 45 eighth-grade students divided into three groups. In the first group (a non-interactive teacher-centered approach), the teacher gave an experiment-based lecture on converting thermal energy into mechanical work. In the second group (a teacher-centered interactive approach), the teacher gave the same experiments-based lecture, but interacted much more with the students and encouraged them to think about the demonstrations. Finally, in the third group, the student-centered interactive approach was applied. The results of the ANCOVA showed that the three teaching approaches were equally effective in developing students’ understanding of thermal phenomena. However, closer analyses showed that students who learned from the teacher-centered interactive approach significantly outperformed their peers when it came to understanding basic thermal concepts approach, students worked in small groups to conduct the same experiments and “discover” the same relationships that the teacher had introduced in the previous one.","PeriodicalId":40710,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Hemicara i Tehnologa Bosne i Hercegovine","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik Hemicara i Tehnologa Bosne i Hercegovine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35666/2232-7266.2021.57.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we investigated which teaching approach may be optimal to facilitate learning about thermal phenomena in primary school. Concretely, we conducted a pretest-posttest quasi-experiment that included 45 eighth-grade students divided into three groups. In the first group (a non-interactive teacher-centered approach), the teacher gave an experiment-based lecture on converting thermal energy into mechanical work. In the second group (a teacher-centered interactive approach), the teacher gave the same experiments-based lecture, but interacted much more with the students and encouraged them to think about the demonstrations. Finally, in the third group, the student-centered interactive approach was applied. The results of the ANCOVA showed that the three teaching approaches were equally effective in developing students’ understanding of thermal phenomena. However, closer analyses showed that students who learned from the teacher-centered interactive approach significantly outperformed their peers when it came to understanding basic thermal concepts approach, students worked in small groups to conduct the same experiments and “discover” the same relationships that the teacher had introduced in the previous one.
在三种教学方法之间寻求适当的平衡:在学习热现象的背景下进行准实验研究
在本研究中,我们探讨了哪种教学方法可以最有效地促进小学热现象的学习。具体而言,我们将45名八年级学生分为三组,进行了前测后测准实验。在第一组(以教师为中心的非互动方式)中,教师进行了关于将热能转化为机械功的实验讲座。在第二组(以教师为中心的互动方式)中,教师进行了同样以实验为基础的讲座,但与学生进行了更多的互动,并鼓励他们思考演示。最后,在第三组,采用以学生为中心的互动方式。ANCOVA结果表明,三种教学方法在培养学生对热现象的理解方面同样有效。然而,更深入的分析表明,从以教师为中心的互动方法中学习的学生在理解基本热概念方法方面明显优于同龄人,学生以小组为单位进行相同的实验,并“发现”教师在前一种方法中介绍的相同关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Glasnik Hemicara i Tehnologa Bosne i Hercegovine
Glasnik Hemicara i Tehnologa Bosne i Hercegovine CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信